Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: parsifal

The Wong Kim Ark conclusion seems to just be Wong Kim Ark is a US Citizen as well as a Chinese Citizen, and exempt to the chinese exclusion laws.

So what?

It dosn’t say Wong Kim Ark is a natural born citizen.


2,008 posted on 02/28/2010 11:50:45 AM PST by Exmil_UK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1867 | View Replies ]


To: Exmil_UK

Absolutely right, however, prepare yourself for the “you can’t read” shtick or the “nuh uh” shtick or the “Wong’s been cited 1,000 times” shtick (without regard to none being cited to make a British-Kenyan-Hawaiian-Indonesian-Native-psuedo African- and maybe part-U.S. citizen eligible for president).


2,012 posted on 02/28/2010 12:16:27 PM PST by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2008 | View Replies ]

To: Exmil_UK; edge919

Not in one sentence. You have to look at the reasoning and case cites in the middle part of the opinion. All that stuff is there for a reason.

Look at the Bible. Does Jesus ever come right out and say you shouldn’t murder people?

parsy, who is curious


2,013 posted on 02/28/2010 12:21:14 PM PST by parsifal (Abatis: Rubbish in front of a fort, to prevent the rubbish outside from molesting the rubbish inside)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2008 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson