Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

OBAMA'S BORDER TROUBLES (The "Death Blow" to Obama's COLB fraud)
TheDrRJP Channel ^ | 07/31/2010 | Dr. Ron Polland

Posted on 07/31/2010 9:37:35 PM PDT by Polarik

OBAMA'S BORDER TROUBLES (The "Death Blow" to Obama's COLB fraud)

Play that "funky border," white boy... Ever wonder how or why that UGLY, GRAYISH-GREEN BORDER wound up on Obama's 2007 COLB? I mean, besides it being a forgery. Well, wonder no longer. After two years of research and testing - and a few thousand combinations of multiple image parameters - here are the answers to HOW and WHY this BOMBASTIC BORDER was made.

Believe it or not, even a few, staunch Obama supporters found the border to be "Fishy," "Suspicious," "Unrealistic," and "Something a decent Forger would never do."

On the contrary, the Forger who made this Border was both decent and devilishly clever. He or she fabricated a border unlike any other, and unable to be discerned or duplicated by anyone. Until now, that is. As you will see from my latest video, It took a lot of time to do the crime (of document fraud). Like the three other instructional videos on my channel, I have assembled a set of step-by-step instructions on how to recreate this border. As you perform the rather complex process of replicating the border, or just watching the steps unfold, it should be self-evident that this border could only have been made by a human, and not a scanner. Obama's Border Troubles is the fourth and final installment in the set of instructional videos that I have provided for accurately recreating the Obama COLB forgery.

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fxd0kQla3FA

http://www.youtube.com/TheDrRJP

 

 

 


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Food; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; certifigate; fraud; lucassmithpartdeux; naturalborncitizen; polarik
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 281-295 next last
To: Polarik

Typical liberal illogic and ignorance. This COLB forgery has effectively precluded the release of an actual original birth certificate for the past two years. Who, exactly, is that “someone?” on an island where over 70% of the residents support Obama? This is the same old liberal garbage we’ve been hearing for over two years.
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

So by this “conservative” and “literatate” rationale, we are to deduce that if THIS COLB had never been shown, we would have gotten an “actual” one sometime in the past two years???


81 posted on 08/02/2010 9:16:21 PM PDT by MestaMachine (De inimico non loquaris sed cogites- Don't wish ill for your enemy; plan it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Hardraade
Your liberal posts here are as misleading as this one:!!!

Here's one of the coolest books you'll ever see. How to build an electric motor with mercury instead of brushes, how to make a bow and arrow that will put the arrow clean through a half-inch oak plank, and similar interesting and exciting stuff. "The Boy's book in work and play". Of course it's out of print, and probably illegal :).

82 posted on 08/02/2010 9:18:47 PM PDT by danamco (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine
It was NOT a forgery.

As long as the owner continued to insist the document date-stamped a number of years AFTER it was obtained was genuine, what other conclusion could one reach?

You try it. 'I received this document in 2000 but it was date stamped 2007...'

Who would believe it? I didn't!

83 posted on 08/02/2010 9:30:16 PM PDT by Fred Nerks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks

Fred, please. Even if, big if, that poster had been devious enough to do anything remotely as strange as Polarik said she did, and even IF it was meant to call him out, which I don’t believe, the document itself was what he said was a forgery and he used his imaging expertise to “prove” it.
The document itself was real. No matter when it was issured, It was genuine. NOT a forgery. And THAT is the point. I have the images that he used to “prove” it was a forgery. It wasn’t. And it had nothing to do with a date stamp.


84 posted on 08/02/2010 9:46:27 PM PDT by MestaMachine (De inimico non loquaris sed cogites- Don't wish ill for your enemy; plan it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine
...And it had nothing to do with a date stamp

It did for me...I could not work out how the doc could be genuine with that 2007 stamp, but points made understood.

85 posted on 08/02/2010 9:58:18 PM PDT by Fred Nerks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks

It’s simple, Fred. The document was a genuine document with a 2007 date stamp. The only thing that was wrong was when she thought she sent for it.
polarik very skillfuly obfuscated the FACT that the document was genuine by misdirecting the argumemt to mean that if the date was wrong, it had to be forged and she had to have done it by CHANGING the image itself. It was an argument full of accusation and innuendo with exactly NO proof of such, but he conjured up images which he said “proved” the document itself was a forgery.
And because so many people had bought onto polarik’s scam and believed him, the images HE presented were accepted as gospel when they were nothing of the sort.
He presented an image using his “expertise” to PROVE to his believers that a GENUINE document was a fake.
Fred, a genuine document is GENUINE no matter what anyone SAYS about it. And that is what polarik’s army didn’t get.
You forget who this guy is. He is a marketing guy who knows how to manipulate thoughts on any given subject. He uses psychological hot buttons and memes to get the results he wants.
Look at his rant to me. Do you really believe that I am any kind of liberal? Do you believe I am an obamanaut? Do you believe that I am illiterate and stupid? Does it sound in any way professional...or does it sound way over the top hysterical?
Then he tells me to shut up or HE will HAVE to break someone’s trust by posting extremely personal information to prove what he cannot possibly prove in an entire month of Sundays, which is PRECISELY that a GENUINE document is a forgery.
Stand back and be objective, Fred. Does this make ANY sense at all?
This guy was a Bush basher and a Hillary supporter who conjured up this insanity with a 9/11 truther to misdirect everyone’s attention from the actual FRAUD onto a “forgery” which was completely unnecessary.
Now stop and think, who gains from this?


86 posted on 08/03/2010 4:55:27 AM PDT by MestaMachine (De inimico non loquaris sed cogites- Don't wish ill for your enemy; plan it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine; Fred Nerks; null and void; stockpirate; george76; PhilDragoo; Candor7; rxsid; ...
So by this “conservative” and “literatate” rationale, we are to deduce that if THIS COLB had never been shown, we would have gotten an “actual” one sometime in the past two years???

The opposite of "Yes," is not simply saying, "No." Whereas, the opposite of "No," can only be "Yes" to varying degrees.

Obama's COLB is a central part of his birth narrative. Obama's birth narrative is a central part of his deception. Obama's deception is what got liberals to vote for him and support him.

When you have the Obama Administration, via Robert Gibbs, repeatedly telling WND Les Kinsolving that he, Gibbs, posted a "certified copy of Obama's actual birth certificate" on the Internet and that it proves Obama was born in Hawaii and is a US citizen...

When you have Members of Congress also claiming that they have seen a "state certified copy of Obama's birth certificate" on the Internet and believe it proves he was born in Hawaii and is a US citizen...

When you have federal judges saying that they seen have a valid "Obama's birth certificate" on the Internet, and that the issue has been resolved, with one judge in particular snidely remarking that "the President’s citizenship was raised, vetted, blogged, texted, twittered, and was otherwise massaged by America’s vigilant citizenry"...

When all of the media, both old and new, along with all on the liberal Left, use "Birthers" as a pejorative to attack conservatives as "wingnuts," "kooks," "racists," and other words that would violate FR's TOS, because they know, for a fact, that Obama has not posted a "valid copy of a state-certified original birth certificate," but a totally fraudulent government document, and has spent over $1 million to keep the real thing locked away....

Then, the only answer possible is a big, resounding "Yes."

Destroying Obama's birth narrative will destroy Obama.

If you've ever seen how one domino knocks over thousands of other dominoes, then you will understand how important it is to keep his true birth narrative from ever seeing the light of day.

Only liberals and RINO's want us to stop demanding the release of Obama's actual, original birth certificate.

Those who protect a traitor, in the face of overwhelming evidence of treason, risk becoming traitors themselves.

87 posted on 08/03/2010 6:54:56 AM PDT by Polarik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Polarik

They don’t risk becoming traitors, in my opinion, they became traitors two years ago.

Washington Elites have known the truth about this Dictator in Chief way before the election. I’m sure they have the dirt on each other to keep their plot in check. There’s a sickness and depravity that permeates these vermin who would sell out their country and their own families for power.


88 posted on 08/03/2010 7:06:53 AM PDT by ExTexasRedhead (Take back our country on November 2, 2010.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: danamco; MestaMachine; Polarik; All

I further the suggestion that this old dispute be washed under the bridge and everyone move on to the present day. I recall the incident and what transpired and feel that those involved had cleared the air and made their points. What can be accomplished by drudging up old disputes? Hopefully everyone involved myself included have learned from the dispute and remember the lessons, but not dwell on them as they are unhealthy.

We are all entitled to our opinions as to all information, and opinions posted here and whether they are correct or not. Plese lets not beat the dead horse that long ago died and was turned into glue. We have much more current and pressing things to focus on. Thanks for your consideration. I am donning my fireproof suit now in case my efforts at peacemaking fall on deaf ears, please take it out on me, I am ready to absorb the brunt of the dispute. I admit I am at fault for everything that goes wrong, I am Hogan’s goat.


89 posted on 08/03/2010 7:14:42 AM PDT by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: ExTexasRedhead; Polarik

” Washington Elites have known the truth about this Dictator in Chief way before the election. I’m sure they have the dirt on each other to keep their plot in check. There’s a sickness and depravity that permeates these vermin who would sell out their country and their own families for power. “

NAILED


90 posted on 08/03/2010 7:21:39 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Polarik

All of whuch still begs the question, Ron. We are already calling for the long form. We already KNOW that a COLB is not proof of anything except that he lives. The long form has not been produced. Just HOW, in YOUR mind, does anything you said change THOSE facts? And how, in YOUR mind, would a forgery make any difference in the relevancy of this entire thing?
The truth is, It doesn’t. It makes NO difference at all in the entire “birth narrative.”
The thing is already a deception by fraud. A FRAUD is NOT a forgery. And you have already proven beyond the shadow of a doubt that your “expertise” is questionable at best. The whole forgery thing detracts from zooming in on the heart of the matter...which is that obama is NOT a legit naturalborn citizen of this country. All you have done is to give the lib liars and bam protectors cover so they can stall for time while you send good people off on wild goose chases.
Yes. It is a deception. But NOT the one you keep insisting on. Your argument doesn’t wash. And after what you have done, it actually stinks to high heaven.
Now I have asked you several times to state what court vetted you. What credentials do YOU have as an expert witness? WHERE have you testified and about what? And WHO benefits from YOUR deception? Because the statute of limitations is running, Ron.


91 posted on 08/03/2010 7:34:11 AM PDT by MestaMachine (De inimico non loquaris sed cogites- Don't wish ill for your enemy; plan it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: ExTexasRedhead

ExTex, you are absolutely right. They knew. They know. We can’t allow our focus to be misdirected. A terrible fraud has been perpetrated on the American people. The hourglass is running out.
THIS is a deliberate distraction. Why? WHO benefits from this?


92 posted on 08/03/2010 7:43:51 AM PDT by MestaMachine (De inimico non loquaris sed cogites- Don't wish ill for your enemy; plan it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Polarik
You tell 'em Dr. P.


93 posted on 08/03/2010 7:44:19 AM PDT by Natural Born 54 (FUBO x 10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine

Smells like treason to me and the stench is getting overly ripe.


94 posted on 08/03/2010 8:03:57 AM PDT by ExTexasRedhead (Take back our country on November 2, 2010.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone

“We are all entitled to our opinions as to all information, and opinions posted here and whether they are correct or not.”

Yes, we are. Are we also entitled to insinuate on a myriad of other sites that OUR OPINION is backed by, agreed to, and representative of, Free Republic? Or to invite anyone who doesn’t agree with OUR OPINION to come to Free Republic and engage Free Republic in a street brawl over it?
That is the question.


95 posted on 08/03/2010 8:09:49 AM PDT by MestaMachine (De inimico non loquaris sed cogites- Don't wish ill for your enemy; plan it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Polarik; Fred Nerks; null and void; stockpirate; george76; PhilDragoo; Candor7; rxsid; ...

Please read post #87 ping


96 posted on 08/03/2010 8:22:11 AM PDT by null and void (We are now in day 556 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: null and void; Polarik

I read it, and I agree with it too!


97 posted on 08/03/2010 8:27:08 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Polarik
When you have federal judges saying that they seen have a valid "Obama's birth certificate" on the Internet, and that the issue has been resolved

Judges are nothing more than glorified lawyers. And we all know what lawyers are.

98 posted on 08/03/2010 8:30:16 AM PDT by bgill (how could a young man born here in Kenya, who is not even a native American, become the POTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Polarik

Kudos to you RON!( Bowing at your feet, while watching the caterwauling Obots gather at the back of the room.)


99 posted on 08/03/2010 8:35:41 AM PDT by Candor7 (Obama .......yes......is fascist... ..He meets every diagnostic of history. en get as far as a Ran)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker

So do I. All I want to know is how a forgery of any kind fits into anything in that statement. WHY make it a forgery? Why go after a forgery when we already know it is a fraud? That is all I am saying. There is no benefit to this argument, legal or otherwise, to make THIS the focus of attention.
So why do it? And why make Free Republic the center of it?


100 posted on 08/03/2010 8:37:18 AM PDT by MestaMachine (De inimico non loquaris sed cogites- Don't wish ill for your enemy; plan it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 281-295 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson