I don't mind rhetorical sarcasm at all. But this was more than sarcasm. It suggested to conspiracy theorists on this tread that statistics are somehow hidden, which is false. You also falsely attributed publication to "Obama administration," although statistics are not handled by political appointees.
And you continue the same in your reply: "Only U3 gets wide dissemination." But wide dissemination is not handled by the government at all --- not by Obama and not even by BLS. It is up to the media to decide how well our dumbed-down population, victims of our schools and colleges, can read statistical tables.
For someone who knows the way to BLS publications and finds typos with easy, you exhibit too little of disciplined thinking and basic fairness. Your rhetorical devices would be just fine otherwise.
P.S. Hope no new typos will distract you from the point of this post.
Frankly, I have no idea wtf your point is, nor do I care. The statistical data from the Labor Dept’s BLS speaks for itself. Period.
Your last post indicates a wild imagination at work.