You just described Rossi and yourself. No facts, just name calling and diversions.
You just keep posting about your boy Rossi, the felon with a history of fraud and how this is not fraud this time. Yeah, right. Even his patent was rejected for not being of a sound scientific and logical basis.
We contributed plenty as to how this is a scam. Unfortunately for you, you lack even a basic scientific knowledge, even of the junior high school kind.
You lack business knowledge to understand product development and how he is violating every sound principle of business but follows the very pattern of a scam.
Your gullibility has lead you to be hostile to such reasoning and experience. Instead, you are just cock sure this is not a scam even though you have not one single solitary fact yo back you up. Well, you are exactly the type of feeble minded person he neeeds to make money; someone with an emotion desire but without any non-emotional reasoning. Someone that he could give any excuse to and get his way.
You just described Rossi and yourself. No facts, just name calling and diversions.
*** I posted the thread where we’re trying to prove or disprove this is a fraud. The record shows that none of the naysayers who have been hovering around these threads have contributed even to the filling in of one field of the knowledge matrix.
You just keep posting about your boy Rossi,
***I keep posting about LENR
the felon with a history of
***felon, yes. The guy has obvious issues.
fraud
***Tax Fraud. The same guvmint that accepted his fuel tax payments — so that means he was generating fuel, doesn’t it?
and how this is not fraud this time. Yeah, right.
***I’m saying look at the evidence. Look at what others besides Rossi have to say. If they are all in on a giant conspiracy then your position becomes far less believable.
Even his patent was rejected for not being of a sound scientific and logical basis.
***His patent is still pending.
We contributed plenty as to how this is a scam.
***Not on that thread where it was asked. Look at just this one post, where what you are contributing turns out not to be factual. If what you have contributed is not factual, what value is it?
Unfortunately for you, you lack even a basic scientific knowledge, even of the junior high school kind.
***And yet, there are guys with advanced science degrees who are angry at me for pointing out, time and again, their usage of classical logical fallacies? Something doesn’t add up. It is this conclusion you have arrived at. I know what level of scientific training I have, so it’s easy for me to see how far wrong you are. There are plenty of other things that do not add up as well.
You lack business knowledge to understand product development and how he is violating every sound principle of business
***I have questioned his business tactics in the past. But others have shown me that his crazy-like-a-fox approach is actually strategically sound.
but follows the very pattern of a scam.
***Then follow the pattern to its conclusion. If he’s a scam artist, how is it that he got so many other scientists to say that he’s onto something? Are they REAL STUPID, or are they part of the ever-growing conspiracy? How did he get a customer to buy this thing? They’re REAL Stupid or they are also part of this widening conspiracy house-of-cards. My prediction: You will not answer this contention.
Your gullibility has lead you to be hostile to such reasoning and experience.
***No, it is my critical thinking skills that have lead me to such hostility because there are so many FReepers who claim advanced degrees who exhibit so many logical fallacies.
Instead, you are just cock sure
***No, but I’m convinced enough to try to get naysayers such as yourself to put their money where their mouth is. No one has done so, but they managed to get the thread pulled. Why is it that your colleagues are such big whiners?
this is not a scam even though you have not one single solitary fact yo back you up.
***I’ll match facts with you if you’re willing to put up something worth pursuing, like money on the table.
Well, you are exactly the type of feeble minded person he neeeds to make money; someone with an emotion desire but without any non-emotional reasoning.
***It is your emotional reasoning which does not allow you to think inductively, to look past the red flags of Rossi’s previous issues to see the ‘forensic’ evidence he has generated.
Someone that he could give any excuse to and get his way.
***I will take your excuses too, if you put money on the table. But you won’t. Because what you say does not line up with what you do.