Posted on 08/11/2012 4:42:48 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
How much damage can a first term Romney do, compared with a lame duck Obama?
I get along with anyone rejects progressivism and loves Dixie
_______________________
Me too but it does pain me a bit to have to vote for a Yankee, but I’m doing it for sure. It’s better than the Muslim in chief.
Well stated, and I agree.
You’re being just as bigoted as any cross burning bed sheet wearing member of the Clan 50 years ago.
And you have the nerve to call yourself “Christian”?
What church do you belong to? Westboro Baptist?
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
LMAO!!! She is nuts, isn’t she?
I guess St. Paul engaged in "FLIP-FLOPing" also.
How low can you sink, huh Ron? It’s disgusting and embarrassing because there are nice freepers on here that ate Mormons. Like the patriot, Jeff Head. I wonder if they even give a sh*t how that makes them feel. I am sick to my stomach reading this, seriously. Are some of these posters trying to outdo Stormfront? They might succeed.
A) Obama's best allies were folks like yourself. He barely had to raise a finger.
B) I made no such claim. I don't do stuff like that. You're lying.
I’ve posted on many a Mormon thread in the Religion Forum, and I can tell you that hate of individuals is not allowed or tolerated.
*snort
I did my time in the service. I was one of those guys. And I say that for the long term good of us all, including the military, Romney must lose.
I don't. Why would a monthly donor (which I once was) be treated any differently from anyone else? Oh, wait.
Much more..take the SC. If O is reelected he may get to replace one liberal Ginsburg, with a liberal.
If Romney is elected he will likely get to replace Scalia and Kennedy with liberals.
The slightly conservative SC will be liberal for the next 25-30 years as the result of Romneys picks...the damage Romney can do is far greater than a lame duck Obama.
Are those the shoes you wear to your “little red church “ in Seattle?
I did not even use the word "Anybody," as in a person. Here are my words, which you yourself posted:
Given there is a 100% certainty that neither Goode or Hoefling will be the next president of the United States, then they cannot possibly qualify as ABO.
*ABO*. An acronym. As in an Anybody-But-Obama. Which is being used in these threads to denote a candidate for president during this election cycle.
Are your reading comprehension skills so piss poor that you actually believe I am suggesting that Goode, Hoefling, EternalVigilence, and even *myself*, are not real people?
Well then, let me help you by saying, since there is zero chance that either Goode or Hoefling can defeat Obama, then neither one can be considered a serious ABO candidate for POTUS by those for whom removing Obama is imperative this election cycle.
Hey that reminds me, did Hillary ever return the china and stuff she stole on her way out?
Disagree.
STRONGLY.
Romney will have an opposition Press from day 1. He will be challenged like he had never been challenged.
It’s no cake walk for Romney.
Less than three months to go. Clock's ticking; chances are slipping away.
Tick. Tock. Tick. Tock.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.