Posted on 02/25/2013 9:25:42 PM PST by Seizethecarp
Today, I had a conversation with an investigator from the Cold Case Posse in AZ. We talked and I expanded on several dossiers filled with evidence for over an hour. They asked for all of my relevant information on Obama, the Harry Bounel alias evidence, and the dossiers I completed on Stanley Ann Dunham, her parents, and Michelle Obama as well. They have it all. BTW they also say that it looks like my information cannot be disproved and will be useful.
I have proof, definitive proof that Stanley Ann Dunham was in WA state in "1961" as per the issuance of a SSN numident in her name with the SSN 535-40-8522. There is no way that she was in HI and I have proof because in the fall she was in college in WA, not HI.
(Excerpt) Read more at obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com ...
The photos gilbert posted in his film would have made stanley ann dunham only 15 years old-(photos published in 1958), and stanley ann dunham was in washington at that time, right? so who is this in the photo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9XqZ8bzfbpk
The sequence starts with a photograph of SAD in a chair (not on a couch) with zero sitting on the arm of the chair. There's a doubt that the image started out as the two of them together, because his arm seems quite extraordinally long where he's supposedly holding her. Also, her hair seems to have been painted away to allow him to be shown sitting close to her.
Then somehow there's a cropped version that shows a baby on SAD'S lap. The child is centred.
Then you go to the group on the couch and notice that the arm of the couch on the right hand side has been painted in, that's where zero was sitting in the original image, which was of the two of them on the chair. When they removed him, the arm of the chair had to be replaced. The arm is at the wrong angle now, and any resemblance to the arm on the left has gone...
Which now indicates that the man was also originally sitting in a chair on his own, not on a couch, and SAD and zero have been seated on 'the couch' in the composition. And the baby, which was first shown sitting centred on SAD's lap, is now off-centre, but having moved, it remains in exactly the same position, it's posture is exactly the same...so it would be difficult to work out which came first, a child or no child on her lap - in which image?
It looks like you start out with four individuals, two chairs and end up with four individuals on a couch.
They had a problem with the hand holding the child. The hand evidently comes from the original seated position of SAD when she was sitting, probably on her own in the chair. They used that same hand she had on her lap and twisted it to be shown holding the child, and the thumb has been lost, the hand now looks like it came from a cadaver.
There's no quick answer for this one. If there were no obvious flaws in the 'happy little Indonesian family' group, it would be simple to say, that black and white video screen-cap of the three-some is a fake. BUT THERE'S MUCH MORE TO IT THAT THAT...imo
And that poor little baby has a major problem with it's arm...one is nice and round where it joins the shoulder, the other looks like it's deformed.
Also compare the back of the furniture next to lolos shoulder with the back of the furniture next to 0’s shoulder.
They are different.
Demanding certified, authenticated proof before trial is a way for OBOTs to discourage civil suits from being heard.
_____________________________________________________
No court action has ever gotten to discovery, has it?
Thus evidence in court has never been presented, correct?
Do you have any idea what zero’s necklace is?
Probably a school project that didn’t turn out as an ashtray.
Yes... you are supposed to throw treasonous infiltrators in prison (or worse)
We have not had even a hint of a treason charge since the 50’s. Couple that with the political correctness doctrine and the MSM slamming the “conspiracy” label on anyone even trying to point out factual information and we have what we have. If it is not stopped it will only get worse.
The girl in the photo looks like a older sister or something.(curley short hair, and she looks atleast 18 or so) madelyn was 20 years old when she had SAD, unless she had a child around 18 years old or so.. Other than that, i dont see any other connection
Those pictures were debunked long ago. They were published by an erotic publisher in ‘57 & ‘58.
Yeah, I know now— I just found out yesterday—lol.. Im doin alot of catching up—thx
I will tell you what I think. He was born to Anna S. Obama and Sr., but we do not know where. Good chance it was in the Philippians. Sr doesn’t want anything to do with her or the kid. Something happens to her and SAD ends up taking care of the kid when he is about 3 years old.
oh, ok— kool— thx for the update
Our son sent us letters, pleading that we intervene to save the marriage,” remembers Sarah.
sounds like anna was in kenya close to sarah reading that last sentence.. how could sarah intervene, its not like she had a phone in her grass hut..
http://allafrica.com/stories/200408160533.html?page=4
What a great point?? What was Granny Sarah talking about?? Why would Barak Sr. ask for relatives in Kenya to intercede in a marriage and a situation in Hawaii??
sounds stanley armour dunham must have came to kenya to bring her back home to hawaii- sounds like he was one hot cookie- it sounds that way anyway
yeah, sarah had no money to travel or go anywhere, no phone- how was she going to get to hawaii - a hollowed out log.. Anna was living in that village
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.