Thanks for the Ping.
Sven should go next, and indeed should have gotten the hammer long, long ago for incessantly putting up posit after posit as if they are fact, without any supporting documenation/link.
Hiding behind a supposed fear of violating the Privacy Act when the fate of the entire nation hangs in the balance doesn’t wash. If you’ve got the goods, drop them and let The Powers That Be publicly prosecute you for their unlawful possession/release. The courtroom drama would do the Republic much good.
There are plenty of defenders of the evil-eared one on this thread, and I agree about Sven.
You’re welcome for the ping. It was my pleasure, my friend.
“Thanks for the Ping.
Sven should go next, and indeed should have gotten the hammer long, long ago for incessantly putting up posit after posit as if they are fact, without any supporting documenation/link.
Hiding behind a supposed fear of violating the Privacy Act when the fate of the entire nation hangs in the balance doesn’t wash. If you’ve got the goods, drop them and let The Powers That Be publicly prosecute you for their unlawful possession/release. The courtroom drama would do the Republic much good.”
AdminModerator;
I’ve been very patient with ConcernedFreepers lobbying for me to violate the Privacy Act. I’ve explained to them violating the Privacy Act will not accomplish their goal of submitting evidence to any Court or any administrative proceeding in the United States.
Evidence obtained illegally is inadmissible. Obtaining evidence protected by the Privacy Act is illegal. Lobbying a person to obtain evidence illegally is conspiracy to commit a crime. Since Obama’s Certificate of Naturalation issued to him in 1983 is a Federal document, lobbying others to obtain and publish a document protected by the Privacy Act is a Federal crime.
Please review the post of Flotsam_Jetsome and Wildhiglander57. They are is clearly lobbying me to commit a Federal crime and post Obama’s private records. While posting his private records will be gratuitous and salacious, it cannot be used in Court because it was illegally obtained. I’ve explained to many ConcernedFreepers a method to obtain Obama’s private records legally, through a civil suit, and it upsets them.
In a civil suit, the allegations made in a complaint are considered to be true until they are successfully defended by the defendant(s). Obama’s private records; specifically, his Certificate of Naturalization, can be subpoenaed if the civil suit survives a motion to dismiss.
ConcernFreepers have been able to maintain the false narrative a civil suit against Obama can only be successfull if his private records are posted publicly before trail. Ironically, a judge in a civil suit doesn’t need pre-trial evidence because the allegations in the complaint are considered to be true while the judge conducts a hearing for any responsive pleading, i.e. a motion to dismiss. The allegations are considered to be true until a defendant successfully demonstrates the allegations not to be true. It is during the discovery process, after a hearing on any responsive pleading, the plaintiff may legally obtain a certified copy of Obama’s Certificate of Naturalization.
Send a message, AdminModerator. Let the ConcernedFreepers know statements of fact are acceptable on FreeRepublic.com and lobbying Freepers to commit a Federal Crime is not acceptable on FreeRepublic.com.
Thank you for your time and consideration.