Would you care to elaborate on this statement. As I've stated above, the difference between scientific theory and mythological fantasy is that the former requires some level of empirical support. At best, it would appear that a mathematics model may challenge some trivial aspect of evolution; I fail to see how it would establish intelligent design as any sort of alternative.
Here, let me provide an analogy:
Histrionic personality disorder is a theory of psychological behavior. It is conceivable that one could devise a mathematics model which challenges the qualitative or quantitative consistency of traits generally thought to comprise histrionic personality disorder. If challenged comprehensively enough, this could cast into doubt the entire existence of histrionic personality disorder as a distinctive psychological profile.
This would not however establish possession by demonic spirits as the alternative 'theory' (though one may fantasize that as one's explanation..)
Would you care to elaborate on this statement.
Certainly. Neo-Darwinism (Darwinism itself has been laughed out by science) postulates that the changes which create new species are due to mutations. DNA has shown that it is almost impossible to change even one gene favorably in a stochastic manner. There are some 30,000 genes in humans and less than a thousand in bacteria so the descent of man alone from bacteria would have taken a minimum of 29,000 miracles (and that is not considering that there are over a million species in existence today each with at least a few genes which are different from all the other species).