Duncan Hunter is the third limited government, conservative who should have been included over Huckabee, IMO.
And probably Ron Paul should have been left out. His unwillingness to take the fight to an enemy who wants us dead simply for being infidels is not the leadership we need today.
Your analysis of Islamic terrorism is flawed. If they hated us simply for being infidels, they would be attacking every western nation in the world. If we stop to look at why the have attacked us, then UK, then Spain, you can see plainly that it’s based on not just being infidels, but infidels who interfere in foreign affairs of other countries in the Islamic world. The attacks on the WTC-1993, African embassies, USS Cole, WTC-911, Pentagon-911... it’s a pattern that goes back to our Iranian hostages and earlier.
A devastating critique if it were true. But since it isn't your statement has all the impact of a beer fart in a whirlwind.
L
June 7
Bush Pick for War Adviser Says Consider Withdrawal
Lieutenant General Douglas Lute, a skeptic of the troop increase in Iraq and President George W. Bush's choice to oversee the war, said withdrawing troops may pressure the Iraqi government to make needed changes.
I don't know if you are only addressing the three in this article, but I think the fact that so many (Malkin, Hewitt, Saul Anuzis, etc.) have called for Paul's removal over Giuliani, a candidate that thinks we should fund child murder, is very telling with regards to their priorities.
Blah blah same old anti-Paul talking point. That's why he supported Reagan's military defenses & voted in favor of the initial phase of the WOT.
And he served in the military himself.
How can you describe Hunter as a “limited government conservative” when he voted for the prescription drugs boondogle and is also quite a pork-barreler?
I agree that Huckabee should not have been listed as a limited government conservative, but neither should Hunter. His record on government spending is not something that warrants such inclusion.