Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Rev. Wright is a better man than Obama. WRight is willing to stand up for what he believes in. I found out on wikipedia that he gave up a student deferment to serve in the Marines and then became a navy corpsman who assisted in treating president Johnson in 1966.

Obama changes his opinions to please his audience which means he is as wishy washy as Charlie Brown.

1 posted on 05/02/2008 8:20:05 PM PDT by kathsua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: kathsua

“Rev” Wright says that he can only believe in a God who is committed to destroying the “White Enemy”.

I don’t know about you, but I think I would draw the “religious freedom” line somewhere *BEFORE* genocide.


2 posted on 05/02/2008 8:24:55 PM PDT by Westbrook (Having more children does not divide your love, it multiplies it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kathsua

wonder why mccain’s minister john hagee

gets a free ride?

mccain and hillary are white.


3 posted on 05/02/2008 8:30:44 PM PDT by ken21 ( people die + you never hear from them again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kathsua

Reverend Wright may well be willing to stand up for his believes, but his believes encompass racism and paranoia.


4 posted on 05/02/2008 8:31:52 PM PDT by bluejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kathsua
I found out on wikipedia

....oy...

So it doesn't matter what the man advocates, you think he's a hero.

But we're told to believe that Bernardine Dorhn isn't the same thing she was 40 years ago.

So which is it? Is he "defendable" because he was a Marine 40 years ago or is he a psychopathic attention hog on your TV screen today?

7 posted on 05/02/2008 8:52:24 PM PDT by the invisib1e hand ("resort not to force until every just law be defied")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kathsua

I agree. Rev. Wright, as wrong as he could be, stood his ground. The same can not be said for Obama. Reminds me of George McGovern saying in 1972 he was 1000% behind Thomas Eagleton as his VP. A day or two later he drops Eagleton.


8 posted on 05/02/2008 8:52:39 PM PDT by Hamilcar_Barca
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kathsua
One of the functions of religious leaders is to condemn what they believe people or nations are doing wrong. If we want to truly guarantee religious freedom, we must allow them to continue to do so even if we disagree with them.

Lying is ANTI-TRUTH, ANTI-FREEDOM, ANTI-INDIVIDUAL, ANTI-LIFE. The lie enslaves us all.

When Jeremiah Wright spews OUTRAGEOUS generalities without naming specific individuals he should be laughed off the pulpit. When he came close to the truth he mentioned a specific individual [paraphrase] ...he [Bill Clinton] did us like he did Monica Lewinsky. Otherwise his divisive rhetoric, pointed at America (in general) or whites (in general) without naming specific individuals is just that...DIVISIVE.

Where does a divisive robe & congregation or divisive robe & mosque take us?

16 posted on 05/02/2008 9:55:29 PM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kathsua
...Wright's statements about 9/11 being punishment are consistent with a long religious tradition dating from biblical times. Religious leaders have often explained calamities as punishment for sins...

I have no problem with Mr. Wright, or any Pastor, pointing out that Judgment is long due on America for sins against God, and HIS Word... But I have several problems with the way Mr. Wright handled it:

1) What was our great sin that he was pointing out? The fact that our government supports different policies than he'd support (e.g., supporting Israel vs. the Palestinians)? What Biblical edict is being violated?
2) Lamenting 'national' sin is very common in the Bible -- but it is always in the context of being our sin. The sermon snippets I saw, were of Mr. Wright, and his audience whooping it up, about how 'America' got what it deserved. Had he been mourning, and his crowd weeping, about America getting what it deserved - I'd treat his words with more respect. Laughing, and cheering on death and destruction is the sign of depraved men - not "long religious tradition".
3) This 'Judgment' seems to be all centered around, 'get whitey'... Where is the forgiveness and love for our enemies? Even if Mr. Wright feels that he is oppressed in America -- the Bible tells us to pray for our enemies. Even the Hebrews were told to pray for Babylon when they were taken to that land.

I don't care how one tries to slice it. Mr. Wright was not preaching Righteous Judgment. He was preaching racial hatred, and mocking America.

19 posted on 05/02/2008 10:09:23 PM PDT by El Cid (Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kathsua
Rev. Wright is a genocidal maniac. This is not an opinion, this is fact from his own damnable words.

Rev. Wright calls for genocide against a race. This is foul racism which is contrary to God's Will as explicitly stated in Revelations. This is damnable as well as being a call to murder of innocents due to their genetics.

He is vile and without worth, as was Stalin, Mao, Hitler, et al - who also ALL share his Anti-God, Anti-Bible, Anti-Freedom, anti-humanity Pro-Enslavement Socialist point of view.

Rev. Wright is a proponent of Socialism, a philosophy which is not and never will be compatible with our society under our Constitution. It is a detestable worldview which requires the subjugation & enslavement of the People by an all-powerful Government - the exact opposite of our nation. It makes Citizens into Slaves. His views are as poisonous as any other treasonous CRIMINAL who attempts to foment insurrection and violence - these actions taking his loathesome words from under the protection of the Constitution and the 1st Amendment. Calls to insurrection, calls to violence, all are not free speech - they are crimes and crimes again.

He is not a holy man. He is not an American. He is not my countryman, nor is he a civilized man. He is not a citizen with full rights - he, by his words, is an enemy to be defeated and expunged from our sight. He should be escorted to the border and declared to be Hostis humani generis, or the Enemy of All Humanity just like a pirate or a slaver (which he is- a slaver) and a price put on his head for any to collect.

He is scum of the lowest order and has no place in our country.

20 posted on 05/02/2008 10:24:43 PM PDT by Republicanus_Tyrannus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kathsua

I agree. Freedom of speech benefits the audience in more than one way — an informed opinion is nigh impossible if you don’t know the speaker’s position. Wright is doing us a favor.

Wright also helps clarify BHO’s “personal judgement”. If we are to believe BHO when one of the reasons that he would sit down and talk with the Iranians involves his ability to accurately judge the character/intent/whatever of Ahmedinajad — it helps us to see how utterly clueless Obama was about the character of Wright. After 20 years of an association with a person, you would think you would know them better (unless OBH is lying when claiming ignorance of Wrights previous crazy statements & sermons).

Bottom line — Obama either completely misjudged Wright’s character after two decades of association with him -or- he’s lying about it. Either way, how can he be trusted to judge the character of those who are openly hostile to the USA?


27 posted on 05/04/2008 5:18:04 AM PDT by jaydee770 (What can not be remedied must be endured)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson