Well?
1 posted on
05/14/2009 10:25:06 PM PDT by
DrGop0821
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
To: DrGop0821
Huh? How stoned were you when you posted this?
2 posted on
05/14/2009 10:26:48 PM PDT by
Drango
(A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
To: DrGop0821
You mean the anti-American Ron Paul who actively supported the 9/11 truthers? Yep can’t stand him!
3 posted on
05/14/2009 10:27:51 PM PDT by
packrat35
(You could make a fortune as a politician if you have the moral standards of a convicted pedophile)
To: DrGop0821
You posted a new thread just to link to comments in another thread?
I’m also puzzled by the way the title seems to imply that our disagreement with Ron Paul is based merely on means and not ends.
To: DrGop0821
6 posted on
05/14/2009 10:28:54 PM PDT by
spyone
(ridiculum)
To: DrGop0821; Slings and Arrows
To: DrGop0821
Why so anti-Ron Paul? Not exactly “anti-Ron Paul”, just think he’s way wrong on the WOT. I do believe in the Bush doctrine of pre-emptive strike against terrorists. I believe Mr. Paul is an isolationist. I would prefer to be totally libertarian, but it just doesn’t seem practical today.
8 posted on
05/14/2009 10:29:29 PM PDT by
Birch T. Barlow
(Go Mariners! Certain 2009 AL West champions!)
To: DrGop0821
Because for the most part he is IMO a nutcase.
9 posted on
05/14/2009 10:29:33 PM PDT by
A CA Guy
( God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
To: DrGop0821
11 posted on
05/14/2009 10:30:12 PM PDT by
Cedar
To: DrGop0821
To: DrGop0821
Not your question... Drango’s. Your question is just pathetic.
15 posted on
05/14/2009 10:31:49 PM PDT by
Kirkwood
To: DrGop0821
17 posted on
05/14/2009 10:32:37 PM PDT by
Snurple
(VEGETARIAN, OLD INDIAN WORD FOR BAD HUNTER.)
To: DrGop0821
SO I guess the logic here is that since Ron Paul garnered even less success running for president than McCain, we should go with Paul. And since the Republicans are in the minority, we should now turn to someone who hasn't been able to get any political momentum going in Congress as our leader.
Read the above carefully. Now read this:
You are a Ron Paul follower because you don't know any better.
To: DrGop0821
Why Are You So Anit ...
-
I'll take American Literature for $300 Alex ...
24 posted on
05/14/2009 10:34:51 PM PDT by
Liberty Valance
(Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
To: DrGop0821
Libertarianism is useless. Anybody who suggests that America should have open borders and let the third world savages drive drunk and kill at will, is on crack.
We had a president named Jorge Busho who believed/practiced that, and he destroyed the Republican party.
BTW, lay off the drugs. They're destroying your IQ.
25 posted on
05/14/2009 10:35:09 PM PDT by
LouAvul
To: DrGop0821
26 posted on
05/14/2009 10:35:47 PM PDT by
Artemis Webb
(Increasingly mulling Newt.)
To: DrGop0821
RON PAUL: It will be a little bit better now with the Democrats now in charge of oversight.
http://michellemalkin.com/2007/05/19/trutheriness-and-ron-paul/
To: DrGop0821
You’re just nitpicking with your picking on anit.
To: DrGop0821
Why not Ron Paul? Most people prefer suffering a beating to jumping off a high building even though the ride down would be exciting.
To: DrGop0821
Wake up folks! I’m not anit FR or anti-gop. Just trying to fire you all up so we can take back America!
The typos and the commentary were on purpoose.
Band together to take back our country!
To: DrGop0821
It's Not Like Your Stategy Has Been Working
What has RP done in Congress for 35 years that has worked?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
