Posted on 08/20/2009 1:52:11 AM PDT by Vincent Jappi
Ping me when Obama orders Service Members to Salute the Kenyan Flag.
This is an international courtesy that is extended by virtually every nation to every other nation. Just as American officers salute the officers of foreign nations, and vice versa.
The author's over-the-top histronics in this article do not serve much of a purpose.
When did Caligula “openly admit” British citizenship?
You think such hysterics makes any worthwhile point?
The theory that having foreign born parents precludes full citizenship is nonsense. You’re born in the US or its possessions, or you aren’t. Period.
Also I’ve aware of US Naval personnel dipping the colors and saluting foreign flagged allied warships. And Chester Arthur stone dead. So what? Courtesy isn’t subjugation.
And going back to Chester Arthur in the first place thinking that makes some point sane people will listen to? geez
IMPEACH CHESTER ARTHUR!
Birthers are getting odder by the moment.
This is the most amusing one I’ve seen yet...
Guys,
Obama is NOT leaving office. The Congress will not impeach him. The military will not unseat him. The Supreme Court will not take up any birth certificate case and, if they do, they will rule in such a way that Obama will stay in office.
That is just the reality. Pursuing the issue to clarify it is one thing. Pursuing the natural-born issue because you expect Obama to be removed from office is sheer fantasy. It is not going to happen.
One of the nice things about the First Amendment is that it allows the nutburgers to identify themselves as such. Mr. Leo Donofrio has done us a favor by publishing this nonsense. We now know the extent of his ignorance or the extent of his malign propensity to distort facts to fit whatever lunatic ideas he might advance.
Except to make his kind look nuts.
If someone proves that the Usurper was born outside of US territory, or if a court determines that a dual citizen cannot be “natural-born” then the so-called “President” was never one, every decision he made, every law he signed are null and void, and every government official can be liable for obeying either.
This cannot be without legal effect..
And that might be why the Republicans are so cowardly and treasonous about the issue: they are simply afraid of the consequences.
What do you have to say beyond calling names?
A country where the government, its minions and its dupes succeed in painting as “madmen” those who insist on the rule of law is an absolute tyranny.
Why flaunt such an utter ignorance of the law?
Can’t you understand that anyone who knows anything about this issue cannot but notice it and judge you accordingly?
It was only recently removed from his minions’ website:
(Courtesy Leo Donofrio)
http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2009/07/29/the-relevant-obama-admission-2/
THE RELEVANT OBAMA ADMISSION
At Barack Obama’s web site, the following admission:
“FactCheck.org Clarifies Barack’s Citizenship
‘When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children…’ “
Read that last line again.
“That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children…”
That’s an admission that Great Britain “governed the status” of Barack Obama, Jr. He has chosen to highlight this on his own volition.
And this leads to the relevant question:
HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN’S STATUS BE “GOVERNED” BY GREAT BRITAIN?
A natural born citizen’s status should only be governed by the United States. This is the core issue before the Supreme Court of the United States.
smears1
[Ed. Notice the link to Fight the Smears is now broken.]
It may have not been the case then.
All right. If I understand correctly, the admission WAS on BARACK OBAMA’S OWN WEBSITE, right? It has now been removed.
Interesting.
I’m very discouraged. Back in the 90s there was incontrovertible evidence that Clinton committed perjury and suborned perjury. He was not removed.
I do not think the current administration of rulers (they are not lawmakers so much as thugs) are at all concerned about laws, or the constitution. Nothing matters to them but staying in power. I doubt it will make any difference to the judicial system and it will be only by God’s grace if 2010 and 2012 are honest elections.
Cut to the chase: this is a public proclamation, not something signed and stuck away in a drawer. It was published and made public at the time. If President Arthur, Secretary of State Blaine, and the Secretaries of War and the Navy did something wrong as implied by this piece of nonsense, then they would have been impeached, convicted, and thrown out of office. They didn't do anything wrong and therefore were not penalized. Sherlock Holmes pointed out in one of the stories the significance of the fact that the dog did not bark.
Or you can believe lunatic conspiracies aided and abetted by the President, important members of the cabinet and the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States. The choice is yours. If you make the wrong choice I have nothing further to say to you.
Apparently “President” Arthur was no President at all, and there must have been a conspiracy not to discover, and acknowledge it.
As a consequence, whatever “President” Arthur did as such was by definition illegal.
As to whether something he did would have been legal or not had he not been a usurper, maybe you colud discuss that with Leo Donofrio at http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2009/08/19/potus-usurper-chester-arthur-forced-military-to-salute-british-flag/
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.