BK,
There is no BIAS at the NYTs or MSM.
They are marketing firms for the DNC. People confuse the MSM “advocating for their client” as “BIAS”.
Not their fault completely as the NYTs/MSM fraudulently pose as legitimate journalism outfits to lend credibility to their ad copy.
Yes the Times is biased, and often incredibly left-leaning, but i thought the tea-party article was pretty good. It didn’t make everyone out to be angry and profane. It was clear in communicating most people were there in good spirits, singing patriotic songs and waving american flags. Peaceably demonstrating for Liberty. As for the estimated number of attendees, no one knows for sure, not even conservatives agree on the number. I was there for the inauguration and there is simply no way as many people showed up for the tea party.
IF THE NY TIMES REFUSES TO OPEN THEIR EYES TO HISTORY IN THE MAKING. HISTORY SHALL REFUSE TO ACKNOWLEDGE THE NY TIMES AFTER THEY’RE GONE.