Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Orly Taitz Flock Shootin'
Lame Cherry ^ | 0/19/09 | staff

Posted on 09/19/2009 9:56:00 PM PDT by pissant

I have not dealt a great deal with the lawyers and their cases concerning Bearick Obama, as in analysis none of them have produced anything, and none of them has proceeded in ways which would set cases to leverage the exact Obama documents sought.

It is like if you wanted a date with a person who was ignoring you. You don't keep after the person who says, "NO", you instead find another person who is interested to help you make the person envious. That is why I stated that tax cases etc... would be how to get Obama's records and would have by now.

In that attorney Orly Taitz is what hunters would call a "flock shooter". She has just loaded up her gun, pulled both barrels and poured lead in a flock of birds to see if she could hit something. She has wasted a great deal of lead in this in trusting judges to work for her when the correct method has always been to do the work and make the court law work against the judge, so he has to work for you.

Whether by flock shooting, or if Mrs. Taitz has figured this hunt out, she has now the opportunity to blow the Obama hidden information wide open due to the arrogance of a federal judge named, Clay Land, down south.

Land has been an ass in this to a Soldier, named Capt. Connie Rhodes, who was questioning being deployed illegally. He has in prejudice which has been correct in accusing Orly Taitz of being a John Edwards ambulance chaser for fame. That though should never be a reason to deny a Soldier their concerns and to protect that United States Citizen.

Judge Land though went ballistic in firing a nasty ruling at Orly Taitz and threatening her with sanctions. The good part is now that Mrs. Taitz either I said by blunder, stupidity, arrogance or planning has walked right into a situation which is about to trap Land in his own rulings.

See Land has now gone berserk as he was already on a short fuse as Taitz has jerked his cord good in basically accusing him of being a shill for Obama politics and it got Land so furious he has read "treason" into the Taitz reply concerning him. So much so that he has levied a ten thousand dollar fine on the platinum blonde.

This is where the spit hits the fan now, because there are numerous precedents which are basic common law in when someone is accused and punished as Mrs. Taitz is about to, that she will now have a hearing and appeal by higher authorities where she can demand now the Obama secret papers to defend herself.

That was the happening earlier this year when another judge named James Robertson tried to bitch slap an 82 year old lawyer named John Hemenway, with fines over an Obama case. This was the infamous "Twitter" clause Robertson quoted as Obama was legal because he read it on Twitter. Attorney Hemenway was no fool and fired back in reply and appeal that the minute he was sanctioned with threats of fines, Hemenway then had full right of disclosure of all Obama papers to defend himself.

Robertson's testicles shriveled up at that one and simply reprimanded Hemenway, but Hemenway is on appeal and the courts don't know what to do with the case obviously as Hemenway has his precedents and rights to Obama's records now.

This is where Orly Taitz has now plunged into. If she plays this correctly, she can do what John Hemenway did and more in demanding full disclosure of Obama's papers to defend herself and her client. Clay Land in his arrogance has blundered this immensely for the Obama cause and Mrs. Taitz should utilize Mr. Hemenway's reply along with something of Land being part of the old boys network protecting Obama on top in thinking all women should be tied to the bed post, barefoot and pregnant, like Obama tried to hang around for the fun sex and then dumped the kids on Muchelle.

Bring Muchelle into this, Obama and feminism, and see Clay Land really gulp before and Olbermann volcano goes off or he runs for the woods.

It would make great fodder for the press to have this all fester and Clay Land have to prove that his ruling was not against American women alone, because where else in Judge Land's rulings has there ever been such a diatribe against a flashy male attorney?

One can never get their hopes up as there has been nothing to hope for, but there is a golden goose now if Orly Taitz places her Russian ammunition correctly in demanding her defense using Obama's records and placing this now in the feminist center for American women, Attorney Orly Taitz and Capt. Connie Rhodes in being attacked by the Old Obama Club.

Let the fun begin. Judge Clay Land slings a scoop of it, you bring a manure spreader load to the contest.


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; birthers; certifigate; larrysinclairlslover; obama; orlytaitz; truthers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-273 next last
To: pissant

Just like the left “knew” everything about Bush? Grow up.


21 posted on 09/19/2009 10:26:53 PM PDT by OCCASparky (Steely-Eyed Killer of the Deep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: OCCASparky

I’ve made up my mind because I’ve been studying the issues surrounding Obama meticulously for 2 years now. I’m always open to contrary evidence. So far, I’ve seen none. He’s a marxist quisling.

He might be your chosen leader, but to those who pay attention, he’s afraud.


22 posted on 09/19/2009 10:27:56 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Lily4Jesus

I’m well versed in the Book of Job, thanks for the lecture. Might I suggest that you re-read Genesis, specifically that little, “Thou shalt not bear false witness” part? What you have, along with the rest of your fellow “nirthers”, is trying to prove a negative, which logically cannot be done. Orly Taitz might be educated, and may have even passed the bar in California, but that by no means makes her smart, as demonstrated by her actions.


23 posted on 09/19/2009 10:29:07 PM PDT by OCCASparky (Steely-Eyed Killer of the Deep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: RussP
Seems that this judge could be hoisted on his own petard.

By whom?
24 posted on 09/19/2009 10:29:41 PM PDT by OCCASparky (Steely-Eyed Killer of the Deep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: OCCASparky

Well, you can defend Obama all you want. Why don’t you start by telling us why Khalid al-Mansour sponsored Obama in college.

Then maybe move on to telling us about his days in the New Party and how that is meaningless.

Then maybe you can tell us why he lied about his relationship - length and type - he has had with Bill Ayers.


25 posted on 09/19/2009 10:31:29 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: pissant
He might be your chosen leader, but to those who pay attention, he’s a fraud.

Like I said, you're coming off like one of those whiny Bush-haters we dealt with for the last eight years, and are about as rational. I didn't vote for the guy, I didn't want him to be president, but it is what it is, and neither you nor I can change it before 2012.

I will once again reiterate what I said before--you're better off fighting his agenda more than him. It doesn't matter WHAT Dem is in the Oval Office, it's still the same socialist crap being shoved down our throats. When will you nirthers wake up to that fact?

So you'll be okay with it if/when Slow Joe takes over and keeps on doing the same thing? Is that what I'm hearing from you? Meet the new boss, same as the old boss....
26 posted on 09/19/2009 10:33:21 PM PDT by OCCASparky (Steely-Eyed Killer of the Deep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Again, I knew about his associations. I told everyone I knew about them. Few of my friends/acquaintances voted for him, yet he was the flavor of the moment. Again, nothing you can do about it now. Hate the player, don’t hate the game.


27 posted on 09/19/2009 10:34:53 PM PDT by OCCASparky (Steely-Eyed Killer of the Deep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

Comment #28 Removed by Moderator

To: OCCASparky

SLow Joe, pelosi, Byrd, I don’t care. As long as teh fraud is exposed regarding Obama. This country can handle a liberal president. A marxist quisling is another story.


29 posted on 09/19/2009 10:35:43 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: OCCASparky
I never heard the DU crap, because I never went on that evil sight.

As concerns Biden or Pelosi, Biden couldn't get a bill passed or lead a socialist takeover of America any more than he can chew gum and blink at the same time. The man couldn't dump sand from a boot if the directions were written on the sole.

Which misses the point entirely. As a matter of Parliamentary Procedure, the natural succession of a removed President would not be the prescribed remedy anyway. It would only go "Vice Prez" then "Speaker o/t House" if a sitting president were "unable for any reason to serve."

This is not such a case. This is an actual Constitutional Crisis, i.e., there is no written remedy for this situation in the Constitution. This entire scenario hinges on the fact that Obama was never a valid, qualified sitting president in the first place. Hence, the remedy for replacing a "sitting president" does not apply.

Period. The country would have to decide how to deal with this, most likely a special re-election like Massachusetts will have to replace Chappateddy.

Interesting. The Constitution never anticipated that we would elect a legally unqualified President.

;-/

30 posted on 09/19/2009 10:36:33 PM PDT by Gargantua (Sarah Palin: The only Republican to take on Zer0bonehead and WIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: OCCASparky
http://www2.wrbl.com/rbl/news/local/article/10000_sanction_proposed_against_birther_lawyer/93364/

Read this from the article: Robertson's testicles shriveled up at that one and simply reprimanded Hemenway, but Hemenway is on appeal and the courts don't know what to do with the case obviously as Hemenway has his precedents and rights to Obama's records now.

You understand this above? The biased " I Twittered it" judge backed down with his sanctioned fine. Why? He might just have stumbled and bumbled his way to giving the lawyer the way to prove that his case was not "frivolous" - as in standing to discovery Obama. He realized it so his little balls shriveled.

If the judge blunders which gives Orly the standing or injury to prove her case, I'll pay her fine - a pittance - 10 grand for her.

31 posted on 09/19/2009 10:37:10 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: OCCASparky

It’s not a game. It is the survival of our republic. You are seeing the consequences already.

Enough back and forth. Accept the marxist quisling if you need to, we’ll expose him and take him down without the republicans.


32 posted on 09/19/2009 10:40:12 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: OCCASparky

Clay was a pretty good judge. Then from the inside, the hammer, like most of us would, folded. (sold out his convictions of a life time, his responsibility to Justice, all). “Clay Land in his arrogance” was just following a script he had been handed, DO THIS.

The winds of change are stronger now, and what the Pols call flip flops, are for the folks on the edge, adjustments. Clay is another weak link in a growing chain of frailty, for the O. Each emboldens the timed righteous.

It seems the Lilliputians may actually manage to topple a twerp on a power mountain. Then what?

Rab


33 posted on 09/19/2009 10:41:49 PM PDT by Rabin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle

Chuckleheads don’t learn much about religion other than to hate it, at Charles Johnson’s knee.


34 posted on 09/19/2009 10:43:53 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: OCCASparky
Democrats WANT you to chase your tails and waste your energy on this issue,

How are 'we' chasing our tails and you aren't. You are wasting a lot of YOUR time and energy here posting to encourage others not to do the same.

Did you stop to consider that for a moment?

Did YOU stop to consider that for a moment?
35 posted on 09/19/2009 10:52:17 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Comment #36 Removed by Moderator

To: F15Eagle

D’oh! Sorry.


37 posted on 09/19/2009 10:57:05 PM PDT by OCCASparky (Steely-Eyed Killer of the Deep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

Comment #38 Removed by Moderator

To: OCCASparky
Again, nothing you can do about it now.

King George thought that to 233 years ago....How did that work out for him?

39 posted on 09/19/2009 10:58:30 PM PDT by The Cajun (Mind numbed robot , ditto-head, Hannitized, Levinite)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle

Yep. The only site that refers to “nirthers.”


40 posted on 09/19/2009 10:59:32 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-273 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson