Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

OK Sean, we know you and your staff view this site

Posted on 11/26/2009 7:47:15 PM PST by big bad easter bunny

OK Sean why doesn't anybody report the BC controversy? Freepers want to know?


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: bc; birthcertificate; birthers; certifigate; hannity; obama; obroma; seanhannity; talkradio
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last
To: gwilhelm56

“SCUMSUCKING EVIL of HER THIGHNESSGW”

GW,agreed but not the question. My, contention here is that the very odd circumstances perpetuated by O team stonewalling creates a justifiably real perception of problem of unknown depth, concerning O’s birth point or some thing closely related to it.

I figure KLINGTONIAN, RCN and probably others have the goods and are in exploitation mode. Just speculation of course, but clearly something is amiss or the O folks would trot out the docs and let it go at that.

Rab


41 posted on 11/26/2009 9:57:07 PM PST by Rabin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: gwilhelm56

I want to know.


42 posted on 11/26/2009 10:29:40 PM PST by kik5150
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Froggie

Don’t forget: Judge Carter has already ruled: It’s okay to commit fraud against the Constitution if you already got away with it.


43 posted on 11/27/2009 2:23:01 AM PST by Arthur McGowan (In Edward Kennedy's America, federal funding of brothels is a right, not a privilege.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: gwilhelm56

I hope you don’t believe Hitlery would be allowed to kick sand in Big Brother’s eyes. She is working for the same folks as Zero. She drew the short straw. ;0)


44 posted on 11/27/2009 5:26:23 AM PST by seemoAR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: fso301

That was what I thought LOL


45 posted on 11/27/2009 5:43:58 AM PST by USMCWife6869
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: big bad easter bunny

Hey Sean, How dare you not care about my hobby horse, that no one thought of in 2007 when it would have actually mattered!

(/sarc)


46 posted on 11/27/2009 5:52:15 AM PST by NeoCaveman (you betcha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gwilhelm56

Was not Berg her supporter? How good a job has he done?


47 posted on 11/27/2009 6:02:24 AM PST by AmericanVictory (t)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Rabin

Would that account for Berg’s suddenly becoming active in a case he had previously ignored along with the client in the case?


48 posted on 11/27/2009 6:04:48 AM PST by AmericanVictory (t)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: NeoCaveman

Why do you assume that it does not now actually matter?


49 posted on 11/27/2009 6:06:05 AM PST by AmericanVictory (t)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: AmericanVictory

Because the election is over.

Let’s pretend for a minute that somehow its proven he’s ineligable, say hello to President Biden or would it be Pelosi. Since she’d be next in line and Biden would be ineligible being on an ineligible ticket.

I also think it would strike people as sore loserism to be bringing this up now and not back in 2007 when, like I said before it could matter.


50 posted on 11/27/2009 6:13:35 AM PST by NeoCaveman (you betcha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: AmericanVictory

OK... the RIGHTWINGERS ARE RIGHT...

YOU BIRTHERS are just as EFFING CRAZY as the PAULISTINIANS...

Go TOKE ANOTHER BONG and leave me alone...

I CALL HILLARY EVIL and YOU ATTACK ME..

THIS COUNTRY IS DEAD!!!


51 posted on 11/27/2009 6:14:49 AM PST by gwilhelm56 (Pray for Obama: Psalm 109:8 "Let his days be few; and let another take his office. ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: gwilhelm56

How is pointing out the truth about Berg attacking you?


52 posted on 11/27/2009 6:22:03 AM PST by AmericanVictory (t)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: NeoCaveman
Is there any court prededent for what you say? Why wouldn't the court precedent establihisng the de facto officer doctrine apply in this case?
53 posted on 11/27/2009 6:24:48 AM PST by AmericanVictory (t)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: AmericanVictory

HEY S*** for BRAINS.

WHO THE EFF IS BERG ... and HOW DOES IT LESSEN THE FACT THAT HILLARY IS EVIL?????


54 posted on 11/27/2009 6:26:48 AM PST by gwilhelm56 (Pray for Obama: Psalm 109:8 "Let his days be few; and let another take his office. ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: AmericanVictory

Precedent? Nope. Just walking down the line of succession.


55 posted on 11/27/2009 6:38:38 AM PST by NeoCaveman (you betcha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: gwilhelm56

Correction... as I’m NOT A BIRTHER, I DON”T KEEP UP on the NAMES of your HEAVY HITTERs

My previous posts stand!!!!1


56 posted on 11/27/2009 6:39:43 AM PST by gwilhelm56 (Pray for Obama: Psalm 109:8 "Let his days be few; and let another take his office. ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: gwilhelm56

Correction... as I’m NOT A BIRTHER, I DON”T KEEP UP on the NAMES of your HEAVY HITTERs

My previous posts stand!!!!1


57 posted on 11/27/2009 6:39:47 AM PST by gwilhelm56 (Pray for Obama: Psalm 109:8 "Let his days be few; and let another take his office. ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: NeoCaveman

But if you walk down the line of succession, and the One is found to be occupying the office illegally, then is not Biden the legal Commander-in-Chief? There is no question about his being a “natural born citizen” under Article II, Section 1, Clause 5, is there?


58 posted on 11/27/2009 6:56:56 AM PST by AmericanVictory (t)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: gwilhelm56

You asserted that if she, referring to Clinton, could not find it, it was not there. Was that not an assertion that if she could have gotten the goods on the birth certificate problem of the one she would have. In fact her srong supporter Berg claims to have filed 3 law suits about the issue, all of which were in fact filed in court. He has not succeeded with them so it would seem that a man who was among her strong supporters tried to do something and has not succeeded. Would this not raise a question of the competence of his effort as her strong supporter? It is not a question of her character but rather of the competence of his effort. In fact, in one of the suits he claims as his, after long ignoring it and having, in the client’s eyes, left the case, he suddenly seems to be trying to get back in it because of modest signs of success. Why the name-calling, other than your ignorance of the facts?


59 posted on 11/27/2009 7:05:54 AM PST by AmericanVictory (t)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: kiltie65; sushiman
If you’ve read previous Canada Free Press reports they have actual correspondence sent out to various American commentators telling them that very thing...do not mention the birth certificate.

Yeap I think some folks here like sushi guy, et.al., just don't get it, or they're in the other side with hidden agenda.

60 posted on 11/27/2009 11:57:56 AM PST by wannabegeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson