Debra Medina Brings Momentum to Screeching Halt By Refusing to Take a Position on Who Was Behind the

Dallas Observer ^ | February 11, 2010 | Sam Merten

[CautiouslyHopeful]

Debra Medina states:

"I have never been involved with the 9-11 truth movement, and there is no doubt in my mind that Muslim terrorists flew planes into those buildings on 9/11. I have not seen any evidence nor have I ever believed that our government was involved or directed those individuals in any way. No one can deny that the events on 9-11 were a tragedy for all Americans and especially those families who lost loved ones."

[patriot08]

For starters look up Debra Medina’s column ‘Latinos and the GOP’

‘It’s a shame isn’t it, that Republicans continue to ignore Hispanics especially here in Texas?’ Debra Medina

‘Ignore them’, Mrs Medina? Since when? What more do you want? Or shouldn’t we ask?

Medina ad: “Who is going to think more about Latino families? Rick Perry, Kay Bailey Hutchison or me, who has a Latino family?” (Medina’s cultural heritage is German and Bohemian.)

Medina statement “Being married, however, to someone with a Mexican American heritage, I certainly embrace the culture.”

Another statement (upon being asked if she considers herself a latina: “I’d not consider myself anything other than a wife and mother, a nurse and a patriot. I believe we too often get into race when it’s immaterial.”

I'm sick and tired of illegals flooding into Texas, bringing with them crime, third world diseases, sucking our welfare system dry AND WHINING FOR MORE!

I don't believe for one minute Medina's propaganda aboout wanting to strengthen the border!

No, Thanks, Mrs Medina. I never trusted you from the start. Thank God Glen Beck outed you. Now pick up your sombrero from the ring and go home.

[American72]

A letter I saw posted elsewhere and liked it so am reposting:

My Email to pat gray, cc’d medina org.

Dear Pat,
An intelligent conversation with a candidate was derailed before addressing the most important issues facing TX.

I heard the exchange between Medina and Beck on the radio. What I heard from her in tone as well as words is that she was trying to get a grip on where Glenn was coming from, answering truthfully that she had questions about 9/11, that she did not know the position regarding the truther status of any of her staff, that she is not the thought police, and would not make it her business unless it got in the way of the other talents they brought to their jobs.

Beck refused to focus on the important issues that have an enormous impact on the citizens of TX: repealing property taxes, protecting the right of citizens to bear arms, and enforcing immigration law. Instead, he diverted attention from these issues.

The interview with Medina was a huge disappointment. She answered his questions regarding the 9/11 rumors, stating that she didn’t have all of the information available to her to arrive at a conclusion. That was a forthright, honest answer. Medina stands by her right to question the government. I agree wholeheartedly. As a US Citizen, the subject matter is secondary to the right to question.

For example, I really would like to have the Fed audited and question the Fed about their decisions and authority to make those decisions. As long as questioning our government (or quasi-government entities) is frowned upon; it makes it rather difficult to protect ourselves, being mere citizens and all.

Why is Beck, or anyone else for that matter, threatened by anyone verbalizing their desire to find out more about any subject that affects citizens? The corner she was trying to avoid being put into by Beck in the interview was her refusal to state any black and white answer because, as she said, there are valid questions out there. Glenn used the typical bully tactic fraudsters use when they are trying to attain their own ends. He could care less what she truly believed, as shown by his inability to let her answer any one question fully.

There are many who have questioned the government on both of those issues as well as a multitude of other issues, and the lack of transparency has not put their questions to rest. Apparently Beck believes that those who have any doubts or questions regarding a topic he has framed in an inflammatory way are inappropriate choices for public office. Interesting. And revealing.

She didn’t get a chance to clarify whether her questions were in regard to the gov being behind 9/11 or covering up the results of the 9/11 investigation.

Unfortunately, too many scoundrels insist on diverting focus onto the wrong issues, creating drama or stating that their intention or goal is for one purpose when it is truly for another. The Bail Outs, National Health Care, AGW, Cap and Trade, etc. all are attempts to foist an expensive “fix” on the American people while they each have, or will, cost the American people dearly through higher taxes, lost jobs, higher prices and contraction of our personal liberty for the purpose of benefiting the “haves”. They fix nothing.

Beck has shown his true colors. He has shown himself to be amongst the many unprincipled people we are contending with today who are using their position to manipulate, obfuscate, and mislead.

He is like the rest of the fakes out there, all the lying scum that pretend to be one thing yet do the opposite. I have no respect for him, and question his true agenda for each and every topic he chooses to discuss on his show.

I will no longer watch or listen to Glenn Beck. He is part of the problem. He needs to get out of the way of people like Debra Medina, who want to SAVE our country from the hypocrites like Glenn Beck.

What is your part in this set up? What is your agenda? Are you ashamed of yourself? Do you feel embarrassed that your set up of Debra Medina has backfired?

Sincerely,
SA
US Citizen living in California watching what’s happening in Texas

[Clintonfatigued]

She lost my support.