Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Welshman007

Returning to Constitution: We’ve got to be able to answer criticism such as this letter in San Jose Mercury News 2/21/10

“I am amused by those who want to go back to the ideas of America’s Founding Fathers (Letters, Feb. 13). By all means, let’s re-enslave any African-Americans who can’t prove their ancestors were free in 1865 (the current First Lady would have to be sold). Let’s take away the vote from women and most black people. Let’s run the federal government solely on the revenues from tariffs and land sales (which would eliminate almost the entire government, including the military of which they say they are so fond). Let’s do away wiht Social Security and Medicare, all child-labor laws, all financial and banking regulations, and all environmental laws.
I’m not sure that even those folks who say they embrace the original Constitution would be comfortable in such an 18th-centure world.”
Ronald G. Kirchem Los Altos

WEll, WHERE TO START?


3 posted on 02/21/2010 2:16:09 PM PST by Bhoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Bhoy
The place to START is to do no further harm. No more law inconsistent with the Constitution.

Kirchem has it backwards. It is because our roots are in the Natural Law that slavery was opposed and eventually eradicated. I ask him to defend giving the voting franchise to those who can vote for goodies from others.

As for child labor, minimum wage laws, etc, the states are fully competent to enact their standards consistent with their Constitutions.

7 posted on 02/21/2010 2:34:12 PM PST by Jacquerie (More Central Planning is not the solution to the failures of Central Planning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson