To: TheClintons-STILLAnti-American
Amnesty and full felon voting would require a full Senate vote; it is not an item that would fit in a reconciliation bill. It is, in principle, filibusterable.
13 posted on
03/26/2010 6:22:22 PM PDT by
HiTech RedNeck
(I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
To: HiTech RedNeck
In principle maybe. But not with Juan MeCain and his loyal lapdog Pandsey added into the mix...
33 posted on
03/26/2010 6:55:36 PM PDT by
snuffy smiff
(imagine if the GOP grew a brain-and threw all RINOs OUT! But that would also require a spine *sigh*)
To: HiTech RedNeck
It is, in principle, filibusterable. Ha ha ha friggin ha. By Republicans? Led by Mitch McConnell? With backup support from Juan McCain and Lindsy Grahmnesty? Those two bastards would see their mothers for a couple of gardeners. Well, maybe you'd have to throw in a pool cleaner or a maid.
Excuse me while I throw up on my keyboard.
Am I going to be in DC on 4/15 by myself?
40 posted on
03/26/2010 7:08:21 PM PDT by
ChildOfThe60s
(If you can remember the 60s, you weren't really there.)
To: HiTech RedNeck
Amnesty and full felon voting would require a full Senate vote; it is not an item that would fit in a reconciliation bill. It is, in principle, filibusterable. The congressional Dems have shown that they will do whatever it takes to wrangle a signature piece of legislation through. They just barely walked a tightrope of illegality with Obamacare. They'll do the same thing with Amnesty.
48 posted on
03/26/2010 7:38:32 PM PDT by
Windflier
(To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson