Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: raybbr

“During the 2004 election Bush INCREASED the buying percentage of F and F from 50% to 54%. “

Do you have a source for that?
I am not saying it didn’t happen, I am asking to learn more.


9 posted on 09/28/2010 2:47:43 PM PDT by RWGinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: RWGinger

From what I understand, Bush set the increase as a goal, but not as a mandate. He did come out against the reckless way F&F were going about it.


10 posted on 09/28/2010 2:54:15 PM PDT by TwelveOfTwenty (Compassionate Conservatism? Promoting self reliance is compassionate. Promoting dependency is not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: RWGinger
Sorry, I should have posted the link...

That June Post story focused its critical reassessment of HUD's affordable-housing goals on the department's 2004 decision—during the Bush re-election campaign—to juice them up again, pushing the target to 56 percent by 2007. Though the story never mentioned Cuomo—whose three-year, eight-point goal hike exceeded Bush's more gradual six-point increase—it did quote his top aide William Apgar, who helped craft the 2000 policy, saying: "It was a mistake." Apgar, who now teaches at Harvard, conceded, "In hindsight, I would have done it differently."

From here..........

It's a long article that lays the blame on Cuomo and partly on Bush.

The whole housing mess is on the federal govt shoulders from start to finish.

13 posted on 09/28/2010 3:01:31 PM PDT by raybbr (Someone who invades another country is NOT an immigrant - illegal or otherwise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson