[ml/nj]

The online images “conveniently” included exactly the same borders, hiding the fact that the Star-Bulletin which had Obama’s announcement actually included 28 other announcements which had not been included in the Advertiser page which had Obama’s announcement.

From what I can see in my quick search of your posts it appears that you have done quite a bit of looking into this. But I cannot see anything that puts your ideas all together. In particular I'm interested in images you think are important and why they are important. I'm interested in some speculation about how replacement of library microfilms might be accomplished, and also whether you think ALL original microfilms have been replaced.

ML/NJ

[butterdezillion]

Thanks for checking that out, ml/nj. I’ve done a lot of research on this. I’m waiting on a piece of information that I’ve been trying to get for over a year. Major obfuscation on a record the government is definitely treating differently. Once I’ve got that information I can post a major post on my blog that will connect all the information.

[Ladysforest]

Hello.
If you have any questions on the newspaper birth announcements, feel free to ask me.
The work on myveryownpointofview is my own, and I would be happy to help you understand, and or work through, the information that I have collected and published. I have shared copies of my work with other bloggers, but the body of the work is my own. LOL, I am the most familiar with it is what I am trying to say.