“That is not true. I have categorically rejected the Obama family sage relating to the year beginning August 1961!”
Good.
The problem with your approach, though, is that it is too limiting. I think evaluating each document or each photo or each quote, etc. is necessary but if you do nothing but that, if you stop there you are going to limit your chance of finding the truth. I don’t think it is a bad idea to come up with a theory, float it and see how it would account for the discrepancies in the official tale.
Hey, I still have one theory on my list about Ann that will really get me a hammering from you:
Stanley A. Dunham is grandpa’s name and SAD’s name, right? Well, what if Stanley A. Dunham wasn’t the SAD we know her to be and was really Stanley Armour Dunahm Jr. and grandpa actually did get the son always wanted? The son could have died prior to Zero running for office and his handlers retro-fit SAD into the name when they were looking for a mother for the story. Why would I think that one up? I found it hard to believe that any mother would allow her daughter to be named “Stanley”.
I imagine a lot depends upon if this image and signature are to be believed.
Susan Blake, in the video that was cut down to a few seconds, originally said 'she always introduced herself as Stanley' - but THAT was long before ANNA OBAMA was found, and they tried to turn her into ANNA.
This was really sick to be sure.
I note that Stanley Armour's mom committed suicide and he got in trouble for punching out someone early in life. This makes me think of familial bipolar mania, often with delusions, which is often co-morbid with narcissism and even borderline personality disorder (talk about bad luck in the genes! Unfortunately I have a lot of experience in my extended family with these highly inheritable conditions.
A person with these co-morbid psychiatric disorders could easily name a daughter “Stanley” and also turn a daughter and a grandson over to be mentored by a pedophile, not that I know this happened, of course.