Since Apr 27, 2011
Posted on 04/27/2011 11:25:17 AM PDT by Mr. K
When viewing the PDF in Adobe the text can be removed and added in Layers
You can compress all layers down to one, but someone clearly did not do that last step to make a good forgery
MOST American's have a copy in their possession and have to use it for various reasons throughout their lives!
This can only come through some form of easy-to-understand and convincing education of the masses that actually reaches those who supported Obama and will support others like him.
Most of those who voted for him, are lazy & don't care about their freedoms (obviously) they just want the government to take care of them, so they can hang out all day & nite & not have to work! Educate them? That would sound too much like work to them!
The answers to those questions are irrelevant because nothing will satisfy you.
If you’d use your brain, just a little bit, you’d answer your own questions.
Have you bothered to examine recently obtained Hawaiian long-form BCs to determine whether or not they resemble Obama’s or are you just repeating the questions that sound good to you?
Take a look carefully at the green version. Enlarged to 400%, you can see the distortion caused by a State embossed stamp directly under item #21. It is a circle, and extends well into the white space.
Perhaps coincidentally, the bottom portion of the embossed symbol’s distortion artifact is layered over by a white box.
Hmmmmmm........
Why wouldn’t the 0bummers WANT to show the State embossing?
Dear Mr. BuckeyeTexan,
I was just asking how something impossible could be valid. A recently obtained BC is not the original, which is what this tossup is all about.
Comparing the released pdf to another BC from the same time and same hospital (the Susan one) shows many differences between the two. If the pdf in question was of the original then those differences would not exist.
I do not woish to persue this matter futher. There are more pressing problems and more intersting articles to read.
Thank you for responding.
When opened in Photoshop at high resolution, the crop tool can be used as straight line to detect deviation. The deviation of both the text and lines are the same. More curve at the top of the document than at the bottom, which is not unusual when copying from a bound source.
It’s impossible only in your brain. As I said, if you’d use the brain God gave you, you’d have your answers.
I didn’t see anywhere on the BC where it identified Obozo’s race/ethnicity. His father’s is identified as African, which makes sense, since he was born in Africa, not in the U.S. I’m thinking that his father would not have been identified as “Negro” because he was born in Africa.
. 
The green background is not from 1961. The cert is printed onto that paper from the original which is in a bound book, which is evident from the curvature on the left hand side.
Note this, all
It is my true hope that you or another FReeper posts a new thread demonstrating this for all of us to see. My daughter knows a LOT more about computers than I do and she's yelling "fake!" because of the layers.
If someone could PLEASE demonstrate this, it would save us ALL a big headache!
(I'm one of the ones who thinks this all stinks to high-heaven, but desperately wants the issue to go away so we can focus on slamming the jerk into the ground for destroying our economy!)
I go by my middle name per family tradition, and that signature was the first thing that jumped out at me. I have never signed an official document with my middle name only, only to go back and add my first name in parentheses. That a signer would use parentheses at all is bizarre.
It’s as if someone familiar with the recent Ann/Anna Toot story felt the need to add “(Stanley)” in there to clarify things. None of the signatures appear original to the birth certificate, either. “(Stanley)” in particular seems to have been written, not signed.
Is it not true that ANY alterations or markings on an official document renders it void?
However, it seems (unscientifically) to me (without choosing sides) that most of those who claim it is a forgery are FR old-timers and most of those who accept it at face value are relative newbies...
Just saying...
What about in comparison between the Nordyke twins and BO, the registrars are different, did they have different ones back then?
http://www.dclab.com/pdfconversion3.asp
When you scan a document into a PDF, the software can actually pull apart the image into different layers. It can recognize text, images, background, etc. and organize them into different layers. The most important aspect of this is the text layer which uses a technology called Optical Character Recognition, which tries to convert what it's scanning on the page into actual text that can then be searched. Governments and archives that have massive amounts of old paper documents (like deeds, birth certs, legal paperwork, and everything else you can imagine) that they need to be scanned into computer systems use this because if you just scan a document and save it as an image or picture file, your computer isn't smart enough to tell that it's looking at text; all it sees is a picture.
For example, if you take a picture of a stop sign and load it into your computer, you can't then search your documents and files for the word 'stop' and expect the computer to recognize it, just like if you take a picture of a printed form with your name on it and load it as a picture, you can't search your name and have the picture file show up. All the computer sees is bits of data that tell it what to display in a certain picture format. It doesn't see any difference between a printed letter 'T' and a picture of a cross. That's why when you scan a document in using the OCR, it uses an algorithm to detect text that can then be searchable.
What happened here is that whoever scanned the image of the printed document forgot to turn the OCR setting off, so when it when it scanned Obama's cert, it tried to break it out into different layers for background image, high res images, text, and so on. This setting was probably turned on at the Hawaii records office because they most likely do use OCR to scan old documents into digital formats.
The problem is that OCR isn't always accurate hence the discrepancies in the layers. You can tell that this isn't the same as Photoshop layers, where multiple images sit on top of one another, because the background image layer has white shadows for where the text has been lifted out into a different layer. The software isn't smart enough to know what is behind every typed letter or signature, so it leaves it blank, hence you have white outlines of all the text and boxes on the background layer, and the background layer itself looks like someone went through and wrote everything in white out.
Make sense?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.