Sorry, but owning a scanning company does not constitute being a recognized forensic document expert. I’m talking about an honest-to-goodness Ph.D level specialist in the field, who has actually testified in court under oath as an expert witness.
Just wanted to be sure that you were up to date on your W Virginia history.
Since you know all the experts who have proven it to be a forgery are wrong, you must have the PhD degree in the field, and please post a rebuttal of their arguments so we can all see the light.
Ping me when you post your rebuttal, ‘kay?
Sorry to you, but those of us who have been working with pixels for multiple decades are the ones who are called for. Your "forensic document experts" are the sort who understand inks and paper and their ages. They can examine signatures for signs that they were forged. None of that is involved here.
ML/NJ
The case now at 9th Circus has a lengthy evidentary piece which takes the forgery apart methodically, and it is now sworn to data for that case. The person submitting the accusations is a recognized expert in the field of foresnic examination of documents and electronically generated documents. Do a little homework.
There are a bunch who would like to testify in court, but the courts won’t let them.
You say we can’t prove a negative. Yet we’re supposed to prove that the BC is not a genuine BC. The guy who could prove it IS a genuine BC refuses to allow it to be seen in a court of law where the rules of evidence would be in effect and the supporting paper/computer trail could be subpoenaed.
Why do you suppose that is?
LoL. Obama has not given any of his fake birf certificates to any court or to any "honest-to-goodness Ph.D level specialist" for examination. Obama is a failure as is your post.