Posted on 06/10/2011 5:33:06 PM PDT by NoLibZone
As the media swarms over Sarah Palin’s emails has anyone thought to ask why the personal information of those who wrote emails critical of Palin was not redacted?
Some very ugly things are going to come out of these emails and not against Sarah Palin. Frankly I’m very disturbed by her legal team’s choices in what I’m reading. Sarah Palin and her legal team spent two and half years combing these emails for pages they wanted to withhold and for redactions to protect the privacy of some people. But you want to know whose information they left in?
Any person who wrote to criticize the Governor has their email and phone number out for the Palin cult to attack. Sarah Palin once again used a seeming “attack” on her (aka, a request for transparency) as an opportunity to turn the guns of her internet vigilantes on her detractors. This is an outrageous compromising of those citizen’s privacy and safety.
Yes, they are private citizens, not public officials.
Palin doesn’t seem engaged at all in legislative process, but spends most of her emails forwarding mean and fawning emails about herself to her minions (the purpose of which Frank Bailey exposed in his book to take down detractors) or emails praising her as God’s chosen. She sent emails during the VP campaign requesting information about her own budgets and positions to such an extent that it’s easy to get the idea she had no idea what she passed. It’s also obvious that the state was not engaged in state activity during the VP campaign, but in management of Palin’s image.
I feel sorry for those media members who traipsed to Alaska thinking that they were going to get unfettered information. What we are seeing in these emails is an attempt by Palin and the people who were appointed by her and working for her in Alaska to create a narrative of revenge and the victimization of Sarah Palin.
It’s only been hours and now they are already blaming Palin as the Email releasing baddy.
"she gets attacked by lefttards filing frivolous law suits in the hopes of bankrupting her and her family... during the process, she has to hire droves of lawyers to defend herself... then, after all that, the same lefttards are still attacking her, trying to dig up dirt on her and her family... some by moving right next door to her (but not in a creepy, i’m looking in your 13 year old daughters window way... not at all... /sarc) and now, their latest attack is to ‘demand’ private emails from the alaskan governor’s office in the hopes of finding something embarrassing... at which point they call out to all the crazies on the internet to comb through the emails... only to find out that THEIR information is in the stack the crazies are combing through. ROTFLMAO ROTFLMAO ROTFLMAO ROTFLMAO ROTFLMAO ROTFLMAO seems like instant karma to me."
http://projects.nytimes.com/palin-emails/date/2008-09-16
Page 10 shows a message outright recommending assassination!
Mind-boggling.
“It’s only been hours and now they are already blaming Palin as the Email releasing baddy.”
Today’s gift for campaign commercials from the Msmlibs, if only someone would use it. Rub their noses in their dishonesty and lying to the public. Make the public distrust everything they say using their own words and actions to do it. So simple to do and so ignored...why?
“Today the MSM attacked SP for the release of e-mails from her time as Alaska’s governor that they themselves asked for. Isn’t it time that the media stopped acting like a propaganda outlet and started being honest with the public?”
Radio ads are not too expensive and print is cheap thanks to the net. Then of course, hit the net as well.
Again, why ignore such low hanging fruit?
Do you notice that the FR haters of Sarah are pretty quiet today? I haven’t received one nasty comment.
No, and he’s smarter than your average lib.
I guess we might as well just set back and enjoy the fireworks.
Give it time. They are still fuming over a ‘lack of evidence’ to whine about. Gotta invent or twist something to fit instead.
The recipient doesn't own the material and is limited when it comes to publishing it.
The folks who sent death threats to Sarah have a problem though ~ their communication was UNLAWFUL so they don't get to assert a right to restrict the message.
That's another reason to always be polite. As long as you project a pleasant demeanor no one will challenge your implicit right of ownership of your own messages.
They pee down their legs as they fear her.
I’m dealing with one on another thread, but he isn’t the nasty type, he is more of the concern troll type, soft and innocent, but dogged, and single minded against Palin.
Excellent point! Good thinking! Something that is beyond the MSM.
Weird. It’s gone now.
Do you need help? I’m ready!
“Rep Weiner excepted of course.. lOL! I said wiener...”
Settle down, Beavis! ;)
The governor had nothing to do with it, the state’s attorney general did this....listen to the news before you atttack her for something she didn’t do, but I guess she’s use to that.
No it isn’t really a focused Palin hater, just one of those drifty, spacey types that just wants something to do and that doesn’t like Palin and doesn’t really know much or care about politics anyway.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.