And we ain't talkin' your generic karma...
Posted on 06/15/2011 3:23:17 PM PDT by techno
National poll of GOP presidential contenders conducted between June 11-14 of Republican voters by Econ/yougov using the interactive method of polling:
PALIN----------------20%
ROMNEY---------------14%
GIULIANI-------------11%
PERRY----------------8%
CAIN-----------------7%
GINGRICH-------------5%
BACHMANN-------------5%
PAUL-----------------5%
PAWLENTY-------------4%
SANTORUM-------------3%
HUNTSMAN-------------2%
ROEMER---------------1%
JOHNSON--------------0%
KARGER---------------0%
NO PREFERENCE--------15%
If you examine the last 7 conventional national polls of the GOP presidential contenders Cain, Bachmann and Pawlenty are all polling with Econ exactly what they averaged with them.
A part of the poll was conducted after the debate, and a person who did not attend leads the horse race.
And we ain't talkin' your generic karma...
Very good numbers at this stage of the election cycle...
granted polls are meaningless at this stage but they do point out trends. And the polls are showing Palin numbers going up, that Palin and Mitt are consistently one and two, and her unfavs going down. the actual % or number isn’t real important.
Sarah Palin increasingly reminds me of the character “Dusty Rhodes” so brilliantly played by Andy Griffith in “A Face In The Crowd.” Sad.
The likelihood that she is getting into the R nominating race is diminishing with every passing day, but she will continue to try to stay in the spotlight. I would not be surprised if she tries a third party run just to play the spoiler role.
Thanks Techno!
Sarah will be the new Comeback Kid!
Her film debuts this Friday at the Right Online Conference too!
This poll shows Somewhat unfavorables at 12% and Don’t knows at 13%. Those are folks who can be persuaded to change their minds.
I’ll bet even some of those 40% Very unfavorables switch over as they learn the truth about Sarah via her bus tour, film, and the debunking of the LSM lies about her.
Someone needs to start the list of pundits who have at one time or another declared that Palin has zero chance.
Lecturing others, now? Motes?Beams?
Lecturing others, now? Motes?Beams?
“Sarah Palin increasingly reminds me of the character “Dusty Rhodes” so brilliantly played by Andy Griffith in “A Face In The Crowd.” Sad.”
I’ve seen that movie. The Griffith character was a drunk, a jailbird, and a disloyal womanizer. You should be ashamed.
Yes. I also think that the “very unfavorables” will have some break off too.
Why? Because for the most part, her unfavorables are based on lies and media manipulations. I believe that once she announces and starts campaigning, once the film gets some saturation and people see how much they were lied to... some will realize that the negative impression they had was based on a leftist narrative rather than truth.
I would.
But then I’m paying attention to what she’s saying and doing and not just regurgitating anti-Palin talking points.
That Bachman thingy they call a candidacy..is a Romney put-up job gambling on drawing off enough from Palin in the primaries to toss the GOP nomination his way. Won’t work
Palin officially jumping in will be the straw that breaks Mitt Phoney’s back. The huge contrast between a REAL conservative frontrunner & a RINO is what we need right now.
"Dusty" was a poor nobody, a shiftless conman,and sexual predator who was somewhat based on Arthur Godfry. He never ran for any political office, though he did try to tell a politician how to run and FOR MONEY, pushed said pol on his T.V. show. He was a petty tyrant, who walked all over everyone and was hated by all who actually knew him. When he finally winds up alone, he goes nuts.
JUST HOW does that jibe with everything known about Sarah Palin ?
It is exceedingly doubtful that she wouldn't even contemplate going third party and has said that she wouldn't.
Your pathetic, biased ruminations are patently ridiculous; not to mention laughable.
“wouldn’t” should have been would.
Man, you are one ignorant fellow, you should be permanently embarrassed at posting that before you realized how stupid it is.
“Someone needs to start the list of pundits who have at one time or another declared that Palin has zero chance.”
Oh, yeah! Thank goodness for Youtube. :)
His post wasn’t a talking point, it was so stupid that even the most liberal media would shake their head at the ignorance of the person posting that, it was like a Tourette syndrome utterance.
Bachmann is a solid conservative.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.