Posted on 08/09/2011 4:06:41 PM PDT by AustralianConservative
I understand you’re deluded. My sister is an addict and you sound just like her.
This isn't about the subject of drug use - it is about the connection they made and how it cannot be made the way they did it.
It is like finding out that kids who participate in sports have higher testosterone levels - and then concluding that playing sports increases testosterone levels.
One cannot make that assessment based upon the data.
It might more easily be explained by kids with higher testosterone levels being more likely to try out for, and be accepted on, a sports team.
Pointing out that the connection they tried to make was not correctly made would not make me anti-sports - it would make me a careful interpreter of the data.
Does this make any sense to you? Do I need to explain it again?
I laughed so hard reading that that I had tears in my eyes!
I see you have an issue with free speech – as opposed to drugged up drivers killing families across America every year.
I guess I missed the part where asking somebody about their quirky hobby is an attack on free speech.
It there's a post of some silly anti-drug rant or questionable study, you don't have to read to thje bottom to know who posted it. Like the swordmaker guy who's only purpose of being on FR seems to be convincing everybody here how wonder Apple is. Your's seems to be anti-dug evangelizing. Both of you do it to the point where people have to wonder if everything is buttoned up properly.
So then, is their any other opurpose in your life' other than convincing visitors to a conservative political forum of the infinite evils of dope?
Thanks AustralianConservative.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.