I know the wind wasn't blowing strong, but it was light. Is it common for these mills to not be turning?
What a waste.
"...Denmark, the worlds most wind-intensive nation, with more than 6,000 turbines generating 19% of its electricity, has yet to close a single fossil-fuel plant. It requires 50% more coal-generated electricity to cover wind powers unpredictability, and pollution and carbon dioxide emissions have risen (by 36% in 2006 alone)..."
One of the largest environmental footprints
Requires equal amount of back up energy for when the wind don't blow.
Maintenance is a nightmare (300 to 400 ft up in the air)
Life span? They periodically need to be replaced (300 to 400 ft up in the air)
Kills birds
Noise pollution
They are UGLY. A blight on the landscape.
We don't need them. We have tremendous amounts of oil, natural gas, coal, and nuclear. Many new emerging technologies will make wind power irrelevant, but we will be stuck with graveyards of abandoned wind turbines.
Algae based bio fuel, (http://www.oilgae.com/)
E-Cat (Cold Fusion Energy Catalyzer ),(http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Andrea_Rossi’s_Cold_Fusion_Energy_Catalyzer_(E-Cat):_Frequently_Asked_Questions)
Mini Nuclear Power Plants (http://www.physorg.com/news145561984.html)
to name just a few.
not to mention, it upsets liberals like ted kennedy
who don’t want to look at the ugly countenances upon their
private seas.
It appears that the only federally funded blowing wind generator that performed up to snuff was Monica Lewinsky.
Coal is a nearly perfect energy source for modern civilization, "wind" is a joke.
Cost doesn't really come into it.