Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Some of You Tea Party Folk Think Perry’s the Answer?
http://markamerica.com ^ | 27 August, 2011 at 00:23 | MarkAmerica

Posted on 08/27/2011 12:10:12 PM PDT by el_texicano

Looks Tough Firing Blanks

If you're a Tea Party member, or you have significant sympathies with them, I'd caution you against climbing aboard Rick Perry's TransTexasCatastrophe. The Media is doing everything possible to paint this guy as a bronc-busting, cattle-roping, Texan, but in truth, there are more than a few things you ought to know about him. He's no friend to individual rights, except in an election season, and he's not really the trend-setter he'd have you believe. His record on jobs isn't actually so swift as he'd have you believe, and he's got less in common with the average Texan than he does with the Wall Street types with whom he prefers to consort. He's no friend of Main Street, and he's certainly no friend to real entrepreneurs, and for all his posturing as one of us, he isn't, and it's been quite plain. Those of you from outside Texas can be forgiven for mistaking Perry for a conservative. It's assumed because he's a Republican, and he's from Texas, he must be. Let me now explain a bit of why this isn't the case.

Friday I heard the increasingly estimable Mark Davis claim that you shouldn't mind that Perry converted from the Democrat Party to the Republican Party because, as he points out, Ronald Reagan was once a Democrat too. Of course, this is a lie by omission, because what Davis doesn't mention is that it was a long stretch of years between Reagan's conversion and his arrival in California electoral politics. This isn't the case with Rick Perry. He was Al Gore's Texas Campaign Manager in 1988, and following the loss, immediately reversed course and ran as a Republican. I don't know about you, but despite Davis' rather disingenuous interpretation of Reagan's conversion, painting it as just alike, I'm inclined to believe he left some details out intentionally.

Rick Perry has been a regular guest on Davis' show on WBAP in the D/FW area for years, and to consider Davis anything like an objective or unbiased voice in this stretches all credulity. Frankly, I hope Limbaugh finds somebody else to be a regular fill in, because Davis is clearly in the tank for Perry, and it runs against Limbaugh's general premise that he will take no position in a Republican primary, except in general terms on behalf of conservatism.

You may have heard some of Perry's more recent statements about conditions along the Texas border with Mexico, and you might be inclined to believe Mr. Perry thinks more should be done. He even tried to repair his credibility on the issue by being broadcast on a live feed from a base of operations near the border for an interview on Greta Van Susteren's show. If you believe that stage-managed bit of theater, I'm inclined to let you know right now that he's relatively no more conservative in real terms than George Bush, which is to say on the matter of his statist, globalist reflexes, he's no conservative at all. I'd hate it if anybody else broke the news to you, because I believe bad news is best delivered by a friend. Check out the following video for where Rick Perry really stands on issues of the border:

watch?v=UwD84nKA5y0

I realize there's a tendency to overstate things in the name of supporting one's position, but it's really no exaggeration to suggest that Perry isn't really very close in his thinking to Tea Party Members, not when measured against what he's been saying since October 2010, but in what he has said all along throughout his career. He's taken money and support from La Raza, ACORN, and other groups that advocate spending tax-payer dollars for dubious programs and projects.

He's also a crony-capitalist. If you're like me, that's simply something you can't abide. I love the free market, but Governor Perry's revolving door between his staff and corporate boardrooms is a well-established phenomenon, and frankly, if you buy into his nonsense, he's going to wind up exploiting your good intentions too. Companies like Merck and Cintra are more his style, and his staff has reflected this over the years of his gubernatorial reign.

You've undoubtedly heard about the Gardasil flap, and likely been willing to dismiss it as a fluke. That would be a serious and potentially tragic mistake. The most ridiculously egregious thing he may have done in his tenure as Governor of Texas was the proposed TransTexas Corridor. You may have heard of it, but may not have any details, so let me expound on that for a moment or two. This was the project that first enlightened me to Perry's big government answers to all things. The upshot is this: It was to be a vast network of toll roads, but more, it would have included some form of light and heavy rail, pipelines, and all manner of things. On the surface, this might sound attractive, but as with any such project, the devil lies in the details.

The plan included 4400 linear miles of a toll road network, running parallel in many cases to existing Highways and Interstates already in existence. The corridor's right of way was to be a full 1/4 mile wide. Simple math tells you that even ignoring junctions and interchanges, this would have consumed 1100 square miles of Texas' territory. You might argue that while it's a lot of land, Texas is a big state. That's all well and good if the state already owns the land, but since it doesn't, it was going to acquire it by use of eminent domain. Again, you might argue that building roads is one function for which eminent domain out to apply, but once you look at the rules to be applied to this project, you might well conclude otherwise. Rather than basing their offers to property owners on free market value, they instead intended to limit it to "fair market value" as determined by a panel of cronies they would gin up for the chore.

This project actually proposed bisecting county and farm roads, and even property, dead-ending what are fairly important thoroughfares for the communities they serve. More, it would have bisected school districts and even towns along its path. Again, you might think that impossible until you understand that this was to be a closed system with few exits or on-ramps, only permitting access at major Highway and Interstate junctions. This threatened to destroy many rural communities, and they rose up against it. Once the details became clear to the public, it was quickly sent back for re-work, and eventually dumped.

Here were the things they didn't advertise, but you need to know. It was supposed to be operate by a concessionaire, Cintra, for a period of 50 years. It was going to employ tolls of roughly $0.26 per mile. A geographical understanding of the scale of Texas immediately prompts the question: "Who on Earth would voluntarily pay to enter a closed-system roadway at that cost over the huge distances in Texas, when a free parallel alternative is just a few miles away in the form of an Interstate, or Highway?" Good question, and the answer is: Almost nobody. So how did they intend to make this work? In 2004,TxDOT applied to the USDOT for a waiver so that they could charge a toll on the existing I-35. The first leg of the proposed TTC system was called TTC-35, the leg that would run from Laredo to an undetermined point on the Oklahoma border. In other words, it was a corridor to nowhere, but in order to get you to use it, they were going to toll the free Interstate and let it fall into disrepair.

Opponents at the time argued that the existing I-35 corridor could be widened, and this was met with a dismissive rejection by Perry's Transportation Commission. They said it couldn't be done in a cost-efficient way. Your confusion at this statement matches that of the average Texan who realizes that this couldn't possibly be true. How hard is it to add a few lanes here and there? Yes, you'll have some eminent domain issues, but nothing on the scale of what the TTC proposed.

They also promised it would promote economic development, but what they kept concealed for a while, until they no longer could do so under the law, was that because it was a closed system, Cintra, the corporation from Spain that would build and operate it, would also have exclusive rights to all concessions along its length. More, due to the limitations on exits and on-ramps, it could never be shown how this colossal highway system would provide any sort of economic boon to anybody, because you wouldn't be able to access most smaller towns from along its length. I'm sure you'll agree with me that the fact that one of Perry's top staffers was a former Cintra VP, and the fact that one of his own staffers had gone on to work for Cintra had absolutely nothing to do with Perry's TTC plans. Right?

Ladies and gentlemen, if you've fallen prey to the hype about Perry, you may be forgiven, particularly if you're not from Texas. You're not aware, as so many here, that Perry isn't the fellow he's now being portrayed to be. He's not a friend to the Tea Party, despite his seeming 2010 conversion, because much like his conversion in 1989, this conversion also seems to be one of convenience. I will assure you, this is most definitely the case.

Perry likes to put on an act about his conservative credentials, and his sympathies with the Tea Party, but if the truth is told, he's no more one of us than the man in the Moon. You might want to let your fellow conservatives and Tea Party patriots know it too: We're being hustled again.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: markisanoobiepimp; markisapimp; palin; perry; perry2012; perrybashers; statist; usconstitution
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 441-459 next last
To: org.whodat
And posting the honest truth about perrys record is not bashing, telling the truth about anyone record is not bashing, the facts are the facts.

Good point, Org. If Perry's supporters really thought highly of his record they wouldn't call our exposing it, "bashing".

161 posted on 08/27/2011 1:28:30 PM PDT by South40 (Perry: There is a path to citizenship for ILLEGAL ALIENS who have served THEIR country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: NoGrayZone; alstewartfan; OrangeHoof; DRey

“She will [throw her hat in the ring] in HER own sweet time....NOT yours.”
“Gov. Palin will throw her hat in the ring. But even without her, Rick Perry is a terrible choice.”

Yes, of course Sarah Palin will throw her hat in the ring. We all know that... even if Sarah herself doesn’t.

But — just hypothetically, you know — what if she doesn’t?

Who will you support then?

Some other (R) candidate? If so, which one?

Or will you support Obama? Because — make no mistake — taking up your marbles and going home WILL be a vote for 4 more years of the Marxist. So will writing in a candidate who can’t possibly win.


162 posted on 08/27/2011 1:28:50 PM PDT by Nervous Tick (Trust in God, but row away from the rocks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: South40
Oh, you hurt me with the name-calling. Political infant?

Twist the convo how you like. Giuliani isn't running. Neither is Palin.

Perry 2012!!!
163 posted on 08/27/2011 1:29:13 PM PDT by DRey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: South40
But just look at how many RINO Rick supporters would. Telling, no?

Nauseating.

164 posted on 08/27/2011 1:30:03 PM PDT by buccaneer81 (ECOMCON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: NoGrayZone

She is waiting for confirmation from Perry of an appointment.


165 posted on 08/27/2011 1:30:10 PM PDT by DRey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: RowdyFFC
“All they had to do was a pick up a form at school, fill it out...deal done! “

No, No,No, If you could opt IN, that would be ok.

How about all registered voters that don't show up for the polls votes go to Obama? All they had to do was show up at a school, fill out a form .......

166 posted on 08/27/2011 1:30:19 PM PDT by faucetman (Just the facts ma'am, just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: RowdyFFC

Thank You!!!


167 posted on 08/27/2011 1:31:24 PM PDT by shield (Rev 2:9 Woe unto those who say they are Judahites and are not, but are of the syna GOG ue of Satan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: NoGrayZone

Also, her endorsement will come in September, after his August introduction bump begins to subside. That will give him another bump and big buzz. Keep him on the front page.


168 posted on 08/27/2011 1:31:27 PM PDT by DRey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: Gena Bukin

A new twist on the old liberal canard,” educated people would tend to agree”. It stinks when they do it and it stinks when you do it.


169 posted on 08/27/2011 1:31:37 PM PDT by org.whodat (What does the Republican party stand for////??? absolutely nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: shield

Agreed.


170 posted on 08/27/2011 1:31:38 PM PDT by buccaneer81 (ECOMCON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA

Do the name Jan Brewer ring a bell? Gah!


171 posted on 08/27/2011 1:31:53 PM PDT by MestaMachine (If the truth hurts, prepare yourself for a LOT of pain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine

It do. :)


172 posted on 08/27/2011 1:33:20 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81

Who do you think succeeds the VP if both he and president are gone? It’s not about succession. It’s about the position itself. Clearly he wouldn’t be eligible to succeed as president, but can serve as a senator or governor. Why not VP. Or is this above your pay grade?


173 posted on 08/27/2011 1:33:40 PM PDT by DRey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower

You Perry neck ring people sure like the gutter.


174 posted on 08/27/2011 1:34:22 PM PDT by org.whodat (What does the Republican party stand for////??? absolutely nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: DRey
It wasn't name calling, it was an observation.

I've been around a long time and have been involved in many campaigns. I learned 35 years ago that you choose the best candidate in the primary. Settling for a fraud like Perry tags you as a political infant. Try as you might, you can't escape it.

175 posted on 08/27/2011 1:34:43 PM PDT by South40 (Perry: There is a path to citizenship for ILLEGAL ALIENS who have served THEIR country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: South40

Ah. Old Kay Bailey campaign slams. Cool. I didn’t know there were many fans of her here. Do you still have her sticker on your car?


176 posted on 08/27/2011 1:35:18 PM PDT by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: steveshoveler
How does Palin stand on “anthropogenic climate change”?

(I'm getting my Sarah Palin glasses soon and wearing my hair up like she does when it is so hot outside! She is one of my favorites in candidate field.)

177 posted on 08/27/2011 1:35:47 PM PDT by hummingbird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: spacejunkie01

I agree Mark Davis is an IDIOT. Conservative my A$$.


178 posted on 08/27/2011 1:36:49 PM PDT by faucetman (Just the facts ma'am, just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: South40
Don't pretend I'm settling for Perry, or that you haven't reduced yourself name-calling. I've known him all my life. It would be a tough call for me which one, Reagan reincarnate or Perry at this time.

Perry 2012!!!!
179 posted on 08/27/2011 1:37:10 PM PDT by DRey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: Gena Bukin

Ummm, she’s been in politics for 20 years now. Perhaps you should learn a tad more bit about her.


180 posted on 08/27/2011 1:37:21 PM PDT by NoGrayZone ("Islamophobia: The irrational fear of being beheaded." Andrew Klavan of PJTV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 441-459 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson