okie dokie.
If she runs, I’ll be glad, as it looks like no one is going to mount a serious challenge to Romney...at least at this stage. So, unlike you, I would welcome something to be other than I have predicted. I haven’t advocated that she not run, because I don’t have strong feelings. If she does, great...although I wouldn’t have high hopes because it is going to be difficult in the extreme at this stage to beat Romney, and last week, with FL moving up just made it worse. If she doesn’t, as I think will happen, well, she is just in the same category as Daniels, Barbour, Jindal, DeMint, etc., etc., etc., etc., all those who didn’t run. And whether I am right or not in my prediction is of no consequence. So enjoy your next few weeks as this story plays out to its conclusion.....
As an honorable person, she would not be playing games with people who believe in her.
Her delaying tactic is strategic. It keeps all her opponents, both foreign (I'm looking at you, Barry) and domestic, off-balance.
Evidently you do not believe Palin is an honorable person, so I view your feigning support for her with a jaundiced eye.
You are either a liar or an idiot. Neither one is good.
One of the questions was about Christy and Palin, whether it would have changed their vote if they were listed in the poll, and 32% said they would vote Christie, only 22% mentioned Palin and 46% said neither one would change their vote.
The money is also pretty much locked in, this late in the game. Any non candidate who thinks they can jump in now and take full command of all votes and contributions is rather naive or stupid. The same can be said for those who would support such a candidate.