[Utmost Certainty]

I’m still convinced Ron Paul would be a better choice over Mitt Romney if it came down to a choice between the two.

I’m not gung-ho about Paul’s foreign policy, but as far I’m concerned, the Federal Government by far the most eminent threat to the safety and security of this country than any foreign power is.

Romney isn’t serious about reining in Fedzilla, so he’s a non-starter for me (aside from the fact that he’s a sham of a man with no real convictions).

[Responsibility2nd]

RoPaul wouldn’t even be a better choice over Barack Obama.

[Gennie]

I’m not gung-ho about Paul’s foreign policy, but as far I’m concerned, the Federal Government by far the most eminent threat to the safety and security of this country than any foreign power is.

This is my belief as well.

[PSYCHO-FREEP]

Right, it’s no big deal that Iran gets a Nuke and Paul said they have every right to have one. (That way they will force the big bad bully USA to “negotiate” with them for a change, instead of attacking them.)

You must be one brain dead idiot to believe that all that matters is we reign in the Fed. and what is going on in the ME is trivial.

[John D]

I’m not gung-ho about Paul’s foreign policy, but as far I’m concerned, the Federal Government by far the most eminent threat to the safety and security of this country than any foreign power is. Romney isn’t serious about reining in Fedzilla,

Do you really think the surrender monkey is? He has been in Washington for over a quarter century. Can you name one thing he has ever done to rein in spending? The only thing he has ever accomplished is acquiring the most earmarks of any candidate running. That is not reining in spending.