Skip to comments.
Why We Were Defeated
Atlah Media Network ^
| February 4, 2012
| Pastor James David Manning
Posted on 02/04/2012 4:12:22 PM PST by iontheball
Dr. James David Manning speaks about the decision by Georgia Judge Malihi to keep Barack Hussein (The Long Legged Mack Daddy) Obama on the Georgia Ballot. Recorded on 4 February 2012.
(Excerpt) Read more at atlah.org ...
TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: eligibility; georgia; manning; naturalborncitizen; obama
To: iontheball
If somebody could sum up the video it would be appreciated.
I can only only watch you-tube style videos on my blackberry.
2
posted on
02/04/2012 4:15:38 PM PST
by
Jonty30
(What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults.)
To: Jonty30
It is an inspiring video by Manning discussing the things we have to do to continue on with the struggle to unmask Obama.
To: Jonty30
Dont bother. The real answer is not there. "We" were defeated because a craven judge decided he would like to live to see his children and grandchildren grow up.
To: iontheball
My take: the Patriots didn’t win in court this time for the same reason that the Carolina Panthers will not win tonight’s Superbowl. They weren’t in the game. If a judge rules completely against one side after the other side doesn’t show up, it wasn’t really a hearing.
5
posted on
02/04/2012 4:28:35 PM PST
by
Pollster1
(Natural born citizen of the USA, with the birth certificate to prove it)
To: hinckley buzzard
Which craven judge? The judge who unsealed Ryan’s divorce papers, or Malihi?
6
posted on
02/04/2012 4:31:40 PM PST
by
txhurl
('We need to be sudden and relentless.' Save the canons for the whites of their eyes.)
To: hinckley buzzard
I think Ann Berdhart (sp) is correct when she says that there’s a civil war coming.
It’s a good thing most soldiers are on America the Good’s side.
7
posted on
02/04/2012 4:32:08 PM PST
by
Jonty30
(What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults.)
To: Jonty30
8
posted on
02/04/2012 4:34:25 PM PST
by
Mach9
To: Mach9
Thank you for the correction. I knew how I was spelling it incorrectly, but I didn’t the correct spelling.
9
posted on
02/04/2012 4:37:07 PM PST
by
Jonty30
(What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults.)
To: Jonty30
To: iontheball
That should be ‘Stewart’ Rhodes
To: iontheball
There is no way in hell anyone is going to throw Obama off the ballot. Deal with it.
12
posted on
02/04/2012 4:58:43 PM PST
by
bigbob
To: Pollster1
You got the Sheit right.
I don’t know why he played along like he was a Judge to begin with. It wasn’t relly a hearing and he probably had the whole thing worked out with Obama from the beginning.
Why else would sudponaes be ignored and the Lawyer not even show up.
13
posted on
02/04/2012 5:01:51 PM PST
by
Venturer
To: Pollster1
Perhaps, the Judge(s) wanted it moved to superior court for a de nuvo trial. If BHO can be made to defend himself BHO may lose much more than a place on the 2012 ballot. ----------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- O.C.G.A. § 5-3-7 (2011) § 5-3-7. Appeal suspends judgment; effect of dismissal or withdrawal of appeal An appeal shall suspend but not vacate a judgment and, if dismissed or withdrawn, the rights of all the parties shall be the same as if no appeal had been entered. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- O.C.G.A. § 5-3-20 (2011) § 5-3-20. Time for filing appeals (a) Appeals to the superior court shall be filed within 30 days of the date the judgment, order, or decision complained of was entered. (b) The date of entry of an order, judgment, or other decision shall be the date upon which it was filed in the court, agency, or other tribunal rendering same, duly signed by the judge or other official thereof. (c) This Code section shall apply to all appeals to the superior court, any other law to the contrary notwithstanding --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------- O.C.G.A. § 5-3-21 (2011) § 5-3-21. Notice of appeal; form; service (a) An appeal to the superior court may be taken by filing a notice of appeal with the court, agency, or other tribunal appealed from. No particular form shall be necessary for the notice of appeal, but the following is suggested: (NAME OF INFERIOR JUDICATORY) STATE OF GEORGIA ) ) v. ) (Case number ) designation) ) APPEAL TO SUPERIOR COURT Notice is hereby given that , appellant herein, and , above-named, hereby appeals to the Superior (plaintiff, defendant, etc.) Court of County from the judgment (or order, decision, etc.) entered herein on (date) , . Dated: . Attorney For Appellant ------------------------------------------------------------ O.C.G.A. § 5-3-22 (2011) § 5-3-22. Payment of costs prerequisite to appeal; affidavit of indigence; dismissal for nonpayment following court order; supersedeas bond (a) No appeal shall be heard in the superior or state court until any costs which have accrued in the court, agency, or tribunal below have been paid unless the appellant files with the superior or state court or with the court, agency, or tribunal appealed from an affidavit stating that because of indigence he or she is unable to pay the costs on appeal. In all cases, no appeal shall be dismissed in the superior or state court because of nonpayment of the costs below until the appellant has been directed by the court to do so and has failed to comply with the court's direction. (b) Filing of the notice of appeal and payment of costs or filing of an affidavit as provided in subsection (a) of this Code section shall act as supersedeas, and it shall not be necessary that a supersedeas bond be filed; provided, however, that the superior or state court upon motion may at any time require that supersedeas bond with good security be given in such amount as the court may deem necessary unless the appellant files with the court an affidavit stating that because of indigence he or she is unable to give bond. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- O.C.G.A. § 5-3-29 (2011) § 5-3-29. De novo investigation An appeal to the superior court in any case where not otherwise provided by law is a de novo investigation. It brings up the whole record from the court below; and all competent evidence shall be admissible on the trial thereof, whether adduced on a former trial or not. Either party is entitled to be heard on the whole merits of the case. ---------------------------------------------------------
14
posted on
02/04/2012 5:22:57 PM PST
by
VaConstitution
(“If your law had not been my delight, I would have perished in my affliction” - Psalm 119:92)
To: Jonty30
“I think Ann Berdhart (sp) is correct when she says that theres a civil war coming.
Its a good thing most soldiers are on America the Goods side.”
AND it’s a good thing the majority of the guns and ammo are on the Good’s side too.......
Not so sure about LEO’s if they aren’t in the south......and I even wonder about some of them......
15
posted on
02/04/2012 5:59:00 PM PST
by
Arlis
(.)
To: Jonty30
“I think Ann Berdhart (sp) is correct when she says that theres a civil war coming.
Its a good thing most soldiers are on America the Goods side.”
AND it’s a good thing the majority of the guns and ammo are on the Good’s side too.......
Not so sure about LEO’s if they aren’t in the south......and I even wonder about some of them......
16
posted on
02/04/2012 6:11:51 PM PST
by
Arlis
(.)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson