Posted on 02/07/2012 11:38:23 AM PST by Red Steel
Attorney Mark Hatfield's Response to Georgia Secretary of State
Below is the ending portion of Attorney Hatfield's 6-page rebuttal letter to the Georgia Secretary of State. Read the whole letter!
"Please note that the foregoing cited errors, omissions, and flaws in Judge Malihi's "Decision" are not intended to be exhaustive, and Plaintiffs specifically reserve the right to raise other claims of error hereafter.
Mr. Secretary, as you deliberate on your final determination of Defendant Obama's qualifications to seek and hold office, I am requesting, on behalf of my clients, that you consider the posture of these matters. Defendant Obama has initiated the submission of his name as a candidate to be listed on the Georgia Democratic Presidential Ballot. Likewise, in accordance with their rights under Georgia law, my clients have raised a challenge to the Defendant's qualifications as a "natural born Citizen" pursuant to Article II of the United States Constitution. The Defendant and his lawyer tried, unsuccessfully, to have my clients' challenges dismissed. The Defendant was then legally served with a Notice to Produce, requiring him to appear at trial and to bring certain documents and items of evidence with him. The Defendant did not object. When the time for trial was imminent, the Defendant's lawyer wrote a letter to you in which he boldly criticized and attacked the judge and in which he stated that he and his client were refusing to come to court. The day of trial, after you warned him that his failure to appear would be at his own peril, the Defendant and his lawyer nevertheless failed to appear for court and failed to comply with the Plaintiffs' valid Notice to Produce. The Defendant thus not only presented no evidence of his own, but he failed to produce significant pieces of evidence to which Plaintiffs were legally entitled. Inexplicably, Judge Malihi, after verbally acknowledging Plaintiffs' entitlement to a "default judgment," then entered an order fully favorable to the recalcitrant Defendant, and to top it off, the judge refused to even acknowledge Plaintiffs' attempts to have Defendant held accountable for his purposefully contemptuous behavior in ignoring Plaintiffs' Notice to Produce.
Doesn't this result sound unreasonable? Doesn't this result appear on its face unfair? Doesn't this result in fact suggest that the Defendant is above the law?
Mr. Secretary, I am respectfully requesting on behalf of my clients that you render a decision in this matter that treats Defendant Obama no different than any other candidate seeking access to the Georgia ballot who fails and refuses to present evidence of his or her qualifications for holding office and who disregards the authority of our judiciary. I request that my clients' challenges to Defendant Obama's qualifications be sustained and upheld.
Finally, in view of the rapidly approaching Presidential Preference Primary in Georgia on March 6, 2012, I respectfully request that you enter a decision in these matters on an expedited basis."
READ THE FULL LETTER DEBUNKING THE DECISION BY JUDGE MALIHI HERE. IT ALSO DEBUNKS CLAIMS MADE BY OTHERS.
Note: An Article II Legal Defense Fund has been established to support legal actions to help reinstate a Constitutional Presidency, per Article II, Section 1. These actions may include civil or criminal complaints, lawsuits in multiple jurisdictions, including, but not limited to: direct eligibility challenges, ballot challenges, indirect suits against third parties, which would seek to clarify eligibility, or inhibit parties from supporting actions that benefit ineligible candidates and/or officials.
Zero proven born abroad and illegal alien would destroy the governments and media’s credibility. All the institutions would be questioned. It would put us at national security risk with our enemies abroad because of confusions/chaos with chain of command... though our domestic enemies are already here with foreign support. We would be the laughing stock of the world. To some extent, all of this is already true.
However, the enemies of the republic are living in a dream world. Concerning some of the police state actions like controlling the internet, etc the whole populace is united in defiance regardless of gay marriage stance. So the current domestic enemies and homeland security forces are in fantasy land. Also, their attempts to do a top-down command and control of such a huge system here will never be efficient, it’s too large and the agency’s too incompetent unless you garnish lots of attention and can’t get out of the way, also the efforts for police actions are going to fracture with oathkeepers and dissension within the ranks.
My marbles are still at play and I have no intention of taking them elsewhere.
You have yet to answer my questions based on the Constitution. I wish you luck on your next match, wherever your marbles may lie.
How’d you do Arabic script in your post?
Why don’t you visit the library of congress Loren?
They create id’s..join forums making pretense to establish credibility,...then they send freep mail asking personal questions..or ask what are your ids on other forums.
We know foggy is a certified nut. Loren is walking freak show.
All of them are in wacko land.
That is actually Persian script. It is easy enough to do by cutting and pasting from tools such as the Google Translator.
I may visit the LOC soon. The problem is I have to do so much business there where I have difficulties spending 2 days working with the staff to arrange a clean-room inspection of the protected documents therein.
Loren? Who is Loren?
Ask your self that question.
It’s the same basic script. Persian just introduces a few additional characters via more dots and such.
The cursed lack of short vowels is pretty much the same though.
Do not make accusations on false premises, friend. If I show you my true identity and it is not who you believe me to be, will you agree to leave Free Republic forever?
If having a born dual national in the oval office spending us into ruin is legitimate, than yes, Mohammad Obunga is qualified.
If the Kenyan Mohammad Obunga is qualified, then my daughter can become a General in a foreign army and then return to the USA and become president.
Peter Boyles Show
Monday, February 06, 2012
February 6, 2012 6am
Dr. Jerome Corsi joins the show to discuss the ruling handed down by Judge Malihi which will allow Obama to appear on the Georgia ballot in November. Peter takes calls in the latter half of the hour.
What Price Freedom?
POST-MALIHI RULING ANALYSIS AND INTERVIEW WITH CARL SWENSSON
http://www.thepostemail.com/2012/02/07/what-price-freedom/
Maybe many would like to think that, but it's been more than three years and we still have an ineligible president, and NDAA, etc. I don't see much dissension. I see a lot of going along to get along, like the reference to the FBI agents alluding to a threat of Civil War if Obama is proven ineligible that I posted earlier.
If there where, rest 100% assured that it would have shown up on http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/. Leo's been all over the L.O.C., multiple times.
The 1797 English version simply corrected the mis-translation of the earlier English copies.
| From Chapter XIX, 212 (page 197 of 592) [Note: A ~22 MB PDF]: Section title in French: "Des citoyens et naturels" To English: "Citizens and natural" Clearly there is a differentiation made between "Citizens" and "Natural" (born citizens). See below. French text (about citizens): "Les citoyens sont les membres de la societe civile : lies a cette societe par certains devoirs et soumis a son autorite, ils participent avec egalite a ses avantages." |
“Plaintiff Welden has already stipulated that the Defendant was born in Hawaii, that the Defendant is a U.S. Citizen, and that the Defendant was Constitutionally-qualified to serve as a U.S. Senator. See Welden Opp. Mtn. “
http://obamaballotchallenge.com/counsel-proposes-a-separate-hearing-for-welden-v-obama-ga
So the Judge has to come up with one ruling that answers all three cases. So the judge had in front of him:
1. One plaintiff that stipulated that Obama was born in Hawaii.
2. Another plaintiff that entered into evidence a birth certificate that states that Obama was born in Hawaii.
3. And the ravings of Orly Taitz.
Why is hard to understand why he would rule that Obama was born in Hawaii?
Welden did stipulate that Obama was born in Hawaii:
“Plaintiff Welden has already stipulated that the Defendant was born in Hawaii, that the Defendant is a U.S. Citizen, and that the Defendant was Constitutionally-qualified to serve as a U.S. Senator. See Welden Opp. Mtn. “
http://obamaballotchallenge.com/counsel-proposes-a-separate-hearing-for-welden-v-obama-ga
So the judge had in front of him:
1. One plaintiff that stipulated that Obama was born in Hawaii. And entered a birthcertificate to that effect.
2. Did not submit any evidence to challenge that stipulation.
3. And the ravings of Orly Taitz.
Why is hard to understand why he would rule that Obama was born in Hawaii?
Welden did stipulate that Obama was born in Hawaii:
“Plaintiff Welden has already stipulated that the Defendant was born in Hawaii, that the Defendant is a U.S. Citizen, and that the Defendant was Constitutionally-qualified to serve as a U.S. Senator. See Welden Opp. Mtn. “
http://obamaballotchallenge.com/counsel-proposes-a-separate-hearing-for-welden-v-obama-ga
So the judge had in front of him:
1. One plaintiff that stipulated that Obama was born in Hawaii. And entered a birthcertificate to that effect.
2. Another plaintiff that did not submit any evidence to challenge that stipulation.
3. And the ravings of Orly Taitz.
Why is hard to understand why he would rule that Obama was born in Hawaii?
Why help your sworn enemies when they are making legal fools of themselves?
Three plaintiffs couldn’t beat an empty table.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.