Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Happy Rain

Well, be careful what you ask for. If we return to “mental illness,” or even if we allow it to be accepted as “biologically determined,” then they will be protected under the ADA and just about every other ‘civil-rights based’ argument there is.

I believe homosexuality is a preference, a choice, and not one that is biological. It is therefore deserving of no special protections or civil liberties.

And, by the way, the call for same-sex marriage is not one of equality. Heterosexuals and homosexuals are all limited by the same marriage options (opposite sex, legal age, consensual, no current marriage, etc.). The same-sex marriage crowd is asking for ADDITIONAL or SPECIAL rights. They want to have the same set of options opposite-sex marriages have and they ALSO want to be able to marry people of the same sex.

I say, no special rights to homosexuals.


37 posted on 02/24/2012 12:56:05 PM PST by Ghost of Philip Marlowe (Prepare for survival. (Ron Paul is the Lyndon Larouche of the 21st century.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: Ghost of Philip Marlowe
Well, first of all, if homosex is returned to it's rightful place as a mental illness where corrective therapy could make the “gay” actually factually gay that would mean that the evil Left has been defeated—just as the ban on the murder of the unborn would conclude the same.

We have four candidates who will fix our economic mess—we only have one who will fix the rest.

42 posted on 02/24/2012 1:13:36 PM PST by Happy Rain ("Better add another wing to The White House cause the Santorum clan is coming.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson