[ct_libertarian]

Over the last week, The Marxists have made it very clear that they are stepping up their game.
Breitbart dead and they piss on the grave.
Limbaugh's sponsors solidly attacked.
We all knew days like this were coming.
Do we roll over?
Do we abandon one of our best when under attack?
Well, do we?

I SAY, NUTS!
I STAND WITH RUSH LIMBAUGH!

[Jonty30]

People need to understand, sometimes you need to feint to the right or left before moving forward.

We would lose a huge asset, if Rush was forced off the air, because he chose to stubbornly stay his ground.

He’d be ok in his mansion and his 100 million dollar+ fortune. It would have bee us that would have lost out.

[pennboricua]

It would not surprise me one bit if Rush began his show with a montage of liberal radio and tv hosts that have said as much and worse than he said without having apologized to those woman they bad mouthed.

What better way to show their double standards.

[TomGuy]

I wonder how much this apology will drop his ‘being right x% of the time’ quotient?

First the hearing, then the backbone.

Who says sponsors don’t have power over the media — conservative or mainstream.

[Jerrybob]

How about this?

You blew it, Rush. Sometimes you need to keep your mouth shut; this issue -- mark my words -- is going to hurt conservatives all the way to November and MAY EVEN be the tipping point that puts Bambi back into the WH for four more years.

[Timber Rattler]

He caved, like all the rest. Accept it.

[sit-rep]

Boy this is gonna save the day!!

[Berlin_Freeper]

When the Russians were close to storming Berlin, the people had a common greeting for each other in the street: Survive.

[Usagi_yo]

I wish he didn’t apologize. It was a perfect opportunity to keep the narrative about them and not about us.

These advertisers that pulled their adds. Let them advertise and cater to the penniless liberals who can’t afford $7 a month for birth control pills.

[central_va]

An idea: maybe the Catholic Church should become a sponsor of the Limbaugh Show. Not kidding. No sarcasm. Stupid idea?

[central_va]

Advice to Rush: Take some of your millions and hire a private detective agency to investigate Fluke's past from stem to stern. Up and down. I think she could be a lesbo, like to know that. Fair is fair.

[marygam]

I understand your passion, however, we are at the tipping point. Words will have to be tempered since as we are all getting a clear picture here, MSM and the left are on the march, and we are not gaining ground. I am conflicted by his walk back but understand it. Glenn Beck said this years ago and so did Rush in different phrasing, their is no reasoning with the left or the Media. They will never stand up to what is right thinking. Don’t be duped that they will. So that leads us to believe that any conservative will be attacked for any reason. Look at how rabid they have been with Palin, to the point of making her unelectable. Rush is not immuned to this venome either folks. Evil exists and we are watching its forces attack.

[skinkinthegrass]

BUMP TO THE TOP
I SAY, NUTS!
I STAND WITH RUSH LIMBAUGH!
like "Battle of the Bulge" Gen. McAlliffe said.
...to which; in the movie, PATTON, actor GCS said,
"BY G*D! WE GOTTA SAVE THIS MAN!

[1_Rain_Drop]

Rush is an entertainer. No more no less.
He’s more interested in selling his tea on the air. Without the air waves, his tea would fail.
Rush cares only about himself. He has a way out. He doesn’t care about us, only our money.

[nhwingut]

I was thinking exactly the same thing last night. Rush is going to go on the war path now. They will long for the day of the lovable little fur ball, making “slut” jokes. Look for a more serious (while still entertaining) El Rushbo.

[chemicalman]

Rush may apologize, but I won’t. Fluke is a rug munchin slut. There, I said it.

[Sudetenland]

Wow! REading the comments here is surreal. Rush didn't retreat from the tenor of what he was saying, he didn't retreat from the focus of his ire and outrage, he merely admitted that his choice of words was over-the-top. Nothing more and nothing less.

If you view his job as being to offend as many people as he can, then you who are attacking him are right. If, on the other hand, you believe as I do that his job is to get the conservative message across to as many people as is humanly possible and to stick up for conservative beliefs, then Rush did the correct thing and will advance the cause in which he believes, because of it.

His word choice was offensive and his jokes were offensive. The same arguments can be made with even stronger authority by using better, more socially acceptable words. Rush doesn't need to lower himself to using the language of Bill Maher, he can do a better job by communicating with ideas and holding himself to a higher standard.

Rush isn't a "shock jock," he is a conservative talk radio host and his--and our--victory comes from the superiority of our ideals and our arguments, not from offensive or crude language.

You go Rush!!! Remember, Bill Buckley never had to use crude language to win an argument, he used his knowledge and reason to do so.

[_Jim]

Dittos

[redhead]

I agree. I join you in supporting Rush. He is at his best in these moments (see: Harry Reid's letter...), and I am eagerly awaiting Monday's show, because I think that over the weekend, Rush did his homework on that Georgetown Skank, among others not so obviously involved, and we are going to get a bombshell of a show. (I always like Mondays with Rush, anyway. He's had all weekend to research, prepare, and THINK.) WOOOOOOOT, RUSH!!

...popping popcorn in anticipation...