Skip to comments.
Left panic stricken as Scalia says Obamacare individual mandate Constitutionally "not proper"
Coach is Right ^
| 3/28/2012
| Doug Book
Posted on 03/28/2012 10:03:53 AM PDT by Oldpuppymax
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
To: Oldpuppymax
To: Oldpuppymax
We have been so let down so many times by the Supreme Court, I am a afraid to get excited.
The best possible solution is to strike down the whole 2,000 plus pages law.
3
posted on
03/28/2012 10:09:01 AM PDT
by
FreeAtlanta
(Liberty and Justice for ALL)
To: Peter from Rutland
>>It looks like its going to be a 5-4 vote to strike down the ENTIRE law.<<
From your keyboard to God’s screen...
4
posted on
03/28/2012 10:13:30 AM PDT
by
freedumb2003
('RETRO' Abortions = performed on 84th trimester individuals who think killing babies is a "right.")
To: Oldpuppymax
So we’re depending on the Federal Govt to put limits on itself?
5
posted on
03/28/2012 10:13:34 AM PDT
by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
To: Oldpuppymax
I’ll bet there’s some petition underway already asking for the messiah to bypass/ignore the SCOTUS.
6
posted on
03/28/2012 10:15:11 AM PDT
by
treetopsandroofs
(Had FDR been GOP, there would have been no World Wars, just "The Great War" and "Roosevelt's Wars".)
To: Peter from Rutland
In that case, the minority opinion should be interesting reading.
7
posted on
03/28/2012 10:16:23 AM PDT
by
treetopsandroofs
(Had FDR been GOP, there would have been no World Wars, just "The Great War" and "Roosevelt's Wars".)
To: driftdiver
>>So were depending on the Federal Govt to put limits on itself?<<
Sadly, we have to. Other examples of already-inculcated overreach (all of which should be reexamind and, hopefully, eliminated):
Medicare
Social Security
DOE
Federal War on Drugs
Patriot Act
I am sure between all of us we could come up with 100s of similar examples.
I hope this ruling is used to get the ball rolling on scaling the Federal Gummint back to what the Constitution says it is supposed to be.
8
posted on
03/28/2012 10:17:53 AM PDT
by
freedumb2003
('RETRO' Abortions = performed on 84th trimester individuals who think killing babies is a "right.")
To: Oldpuppymax
Sad that 4 on the bench are likely capable of squinting their eyes and (pretending they can) see this monstrosity as Constitutional from our Founders' perspective. Even more sad that 2 of those 4 were put on the bench by an usurper to the Executive Office that has no authority given his foreign lineage to occupy the seat he holds.
9
posted on
03/28/2012 10:21:32 AM PDT
by
so_real
( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
To: Oldpuppymax
Anybody find a “last days of Hitler” parody for Obamacare?
10
posted on
03/28/2012 10:22:32 AM PDT
by
Huskrrrr
To: Peter from Rutland
It looks like its going to be a 5-4 vote to strike down the ENTIRE law. And I would suggest impeachment and removal of the 4 dissenting; because this is in direct violation of the Oath of Office they have taken. With televised recordings, and innumerable witnesses - each voluntarily and without reservation SWORE to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States, without reservation and of their own free will. It's pretty clear that any ruling contrary to defending the US Constitution is a voilation of their duty - and should have consequences.
11
posted on
03/28/2012 10:22:47 AM PDT
by
Hodar
( Who needs laws; when this FEELS so right?)
To: Peter from Rutland
I wonder if the economy will take off, if the court strikes this down? How soon will companies start hiring like crazy?
12
posted on
03/28/2012 10:23:30 AM PDT
by
FreeAtlanta
(Liberty and Justice for ALL)
To: freedumb2003; Peter from Rutland
I agree. And (without meaning to ill-judge you or anyone else), I rarely, rarely pray for this or that temporal political outcome. But I prayed for Kerry’s defeat in 2004 and I’ll pray again for this horror of a law to be rejected.
13
posted on
03/28/2012 10:29:10 AM PDT
by
pogo101
To: driftdiver
"So were depending on the Federal Govt to put limits on itself?" We may as well have a unitary government if "Federal" has no meaning. What's a federal system for? So we can each design our own flag?
14
posted on
03/28/2012 10:30:20 AM PDT
by
cookcounty
(Newt 2012: ---> Because he got it DONE.)
To: FreeAtlanta
Business would like to see single payer to get themselves out of it. While they may be joyed that obamacare is tossed, the current system is a burden to them. I don’t see that this alone will cause a hiring boom.
15
posted on
03/28/2012 10:30:28 AM PDT
by
DonaldC
(A nation cannot stand in the absence of religious principle.)
To: driftdiver
So were depending on the Federal Govt to put limits on itself? ...and that works so well. Just look at the debt ceiling(s)
16
posted on
03/28/2012 10:30:42 AM PDT
by
Roccus
To: Hodar
And I would suggest impeachment and removal of the 4 dissentingSo tell us how we are going to get a 2/3rds vote for removal in the Senate?
17
posted on
03/28/2012 10:32:06 AM PDT
by
dirtboy
To: Oldpuppymax
The Communists are very good at planning each move, they have been at it for over sixty years, to bury us. They are so close to succeeding. Let's look at this:
Obamma publicly insults the SCOTUS.
Obamma appoints communist judge.
Obammacare get’s challenged and rejected by SCOTUS.
Obamma propaganda machine tells populaces that the SCOTUS rejected Obammacare, not on grounds, but in spiteful revenge.
Obamma’s OWS crowd demand “justice”.
Riots begin, marshal law declared.
Checkmate-Kruschev.
18
posted on
03/28/2012 10:32:08 AM PDT
by
RavenLooneyToon
(Tail gunner Joe was right.)
To: Peter from Rutland
It looks like its going to be a 5-4 vote to strike down the ENTIRE law.Gawd I hope so. But do you remember how apes##t the left went over the 5-4 Bush v Gore decision?
19
posted on
03/28/2012 10:34:03 AM PDT
by
Marathoner
(Obama has his own 9-9-9-plan: $9.99 a gallon at the pump.)
To: Oldpuppymax
I can't believe that ‘not proper’ is the strongest criticism that an intelligent adult (in the business of the LAW) could come up with!!
In fact, the law is so clear on what may and may not be done, that I don't know why the thing got as far as it did in the first place.
From the day that monstrous fraud on the American public was proposed, we should have taken the word ‘impossible’ out of every Dictionary of the English language!!
20
posted on
03/28/2012 10:35:15 AM PDT
by
SMARTY
("The man who has no inner-life is a slave to his surroundings. "Henri Frederic Amiel)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson