Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Maryland returns unprocessed handgun permit applications
Monachus Lex ^ | April 13, 2012 | John Pierce

Posted on 04/14/2012 6:36:52 AM PDT by JohnPierce

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 last
To: Salamander

>>...I do not like being cyber-stalked just because somebody is playing the penny-per-click game...<<

I don’t like it either, but I don’t obsess over them. I just clean my stuff regularly and employ reasonable protections and take reasonable precautions. I dang sure don’t click anything hinky unless I’m in a sand-boxed environment (just a window away).

So, I can sleep at night... :-)


61 posted on 04/14/2012 3:15:52 PM PDT by jaydee770
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: jaydee770

The longer the reply the more the reply is without doubt twisted logic, such as yours.

The fact remains, using FR to increase your blog traffic is blog pimping and theft as you are using another web site (FR) to generate traffic for your own.

FR allows blog postings when they are in line with FR’s own purpose, and that’s just fine, but to excerpt and do other things on FR to drive traffic to your own site is blog pimping. It costs money, my money too, to run FR and to use FR for your own blog purposes is theft.


62 posted on 04/14/2012 3:27:31 PM PDT by CodeToad (I'm so right-wing if I lifted my left leg I'd go into a spin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

>>...Nobody wants anybody banned....<<

I stand corrected! It must be your sweet, “humble” disposition that makes it merely seem like you’re badge-heavy and ban-happy.

Perhaps one day I’ll catch you actually contributing to the discussion (hopefully genially), rather than interrupting the discussion with another of your typically disproportionate, irascible admonishments for “excerpting”, seemingly trying your level best to turn away contributors and alienate readers, perhaps thinking (bless your heart) that you are doing the opposite.

Benefit of the doubt: I’m presuming you are capable of either.

Now given your posting history that I have observed, contributing to the discussion (hopefully genially) might also be a very, very hard concept for you in particular to grasp. So while I might be able to re-phrase that for you if needed, it would probably take a heroic effort to *understand* it for you.


63 posted on 04/14/2012 3:58:11 PM PDT by jaydee770
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: jaydee770

You use a hell of a lot of words to say very little.


64 posted on 04/14/2012 4:04:18 PM PDT by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

>>...The longer the reply the more the reply is without doubt twisted logic, such as yours...<<

What? Did you want me to excerpt my reply? I thought it was pretty straight forward and in fact I even dumbed it down a bit by demonstrating step-by-bloody-step how I figured this. How is the logic twisted? Or is it that you just can’t refute it? Now, don’t get all huffy. You threw down a gauntlet with your claim of web-traffic-theft-by-blogger and I just picked it up and tossed it right back at you.

There is the chance that actual metrics compared from both sites may prove me wrong, but I doubt it. A back of a napkin quick guesstimate shows FR likely benefits from an excerpted post (speaking just in terms of web traffic) either evenly or better. I would bet there is a bias to “better”. A big bias. Unless the blog is HYOOOOGELY popular, as in “more popular than FR” and that would probably be a rare occurrence.

So, when FR comes out ahead in web-traffic, does that mean FR is in the bloggers debt and FR is stealing from the blogger? No. That is just as absurd and wholly unfounded as accusing the excerpting blogger of theft from FR. It just means that the arrangement benefits both (as it should) and FR likely comes out ahead.

Explain how it could be different? Take as much room as you like. I won’t resort to accusing you of twisted logic unless I can point it out specifically. Remember, FR is getting web traffic while we argue this, so this should really be a “revenue positive” excerpt post by now!

Now if an excerpted post is just a “crooked picture” that bugs you because you can’t “straighten it”, or you *like* to scroll through long articles to get to the discussion, or some other personal reason, then that’s another issue entirely and all I can say is that opinions will vary. But accusing “theft” is just silly, which is the point I’m addressing here. And it’s easy. No twisted logic required.


65 posted on 04/14/2012 4:35:28 PM PDT by jaydee770
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

So I got it down to a level you can understand? Happy to help!


66 posted on 04/14/2012 4:42:34 PM PDT by jaydee770
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Salamander
Salamander, and any others who have a worry or complaint about "tracking" stuff when you visit a website:

http://www.abine.com/dntdetail.php

I use this. Its FREE, light and works.
Removes the worry...at least from a 'technical' standpoint. Personal beefs may continue as deemed necessary.
67 posted on 04/14/2012 8:56:06 PM PDT by Tainan (Cogito, ergo conservatus sum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: JohnPierce; humblegunner
If this is a violation of the rules of the forum, could a moderator please let me know?

No, no, you're fine.

It's more that we just hate you, personally.

68 posted on 04/14/2012 8:58:40 PM PDT by Lazamataz (Shut up and drill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Venturer
Please see post # 67. It might help alleviate some of your concerns re:'cookies' and 'tracking' things when you visit a website.
I use it and no, I do not work for these people.
69 posted on 04/14/2012 9:00:57 PM PDT by Tainan (Cogito, ergo conservatus sum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Now THAT I can work with. :)


70 posted on 04/16/2012 11:09:33 AM PDT by JohnPierce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: JohnPierce
"No no no, you're fine. It's more that we just hate you, personally."

Now THAT I can work with. :)

Did I say hate? I meant love.

We love you.

71 posted on 04/16/2012 1:55:55 PM PDT by Lazamataz (Shut up and drill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson