Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is Lugar’s Loss an ‘Alarm Bell’ for the Death of Bipartisanship?
PJ Media ^ | May 9, 2012 | Bridget Johnson

Posted on 05/10/2012 6:45:39 AM PDT by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last
To: annieokie

Bump


21 posted on 05/10/2012 6:58:07 AM PDT by Kaslin (Acronym for OBAMA: One Big Ass Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ConorMacNessa

There are no RINOs, Republicans, maybe with the exception of Reagan, have always been spineless Jellyfish. If anything it was Reagan that was the RINO.


22 posted on 05/10/2012 6:58:56 AM PDT by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: JudgemAll
The term "bipartisanship" is virtually unknown in other western democracies. It is entirely an invention of the American left, as far as I can tell.

In other countries it is called "coalition government". It is only entered into because no one party has a majority or because the country faces an existential threat such as a war.

In parliamentary systems, the government is "opposed" by the "opposition" which is basically opposed to everything the government is doing.

23 posted on 05/10/2012 7:00:23 AM PDT by Former Proud Canadian (Obamanomics-We don't need your stinking tar sands oil, we'll just grow algae.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

It was Obama’s election that ended bipartisanship.


24 posted on 05/10/2012 7:00:52 AM PDT by chopperman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Death of bipartisanship my ass. One less RINO, who caves to the dems, I’d call it a good start!


25 posted on 05/10/2012 7:00:55 AM PDT by b4its2late (Patience is not a virtue, it is a waste of time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
"the death of bipartisanship?"

One could only hope, but I'm not holding my breath...

26 posted on 05/10/2012 7:01:12 AM PDT by gov_bean_ counter (Sarah Palin: More miles per sound bite than the closest competitor...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Keith in Iowa

Me too.

They are there to represent their constituants and their state within the bounds of the constitution. When they lose sight of that, they enter the world of bending over for the libs albeit some of the recently enacted anti liberty and freedom laws bely the notion that it is only the dems who are “liberal”.

Maybe in that far off land where there are conservatives and moderates in both parties, compromise was possible but not today as one party is hard corps left with no internal decension allowed...the other is not quite as lefty and equally the leaders allow no division in their ranks. So, you are either hard corps left or “moderate”. What do you get when a moderate compromises with a hard corps lefty: a socialist.


27 posted on 05/10/2012 7:01:49 AM PDT by Mouton (Voting is an opiate of the electorate. Nothing changes no matter who wins..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Carlin had that nailed.


28 posted on 05/10/2012 7:02:25 AM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (If you like lying Socialist dirtbags, you'll love Slick Willard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Here's yer bipartisanship as it now stands:


29 posted on 05/10/2012 7:03:04 AM PDT by cuban leaf (Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Re: Durbin’s comments on Lugar.

I am sure the good voters of Indiana are pleased as punch to have the senator from the people’s republic of Ill-Annoy criticize their choice.

If Kerry and Durbin are SO interested in bipartisanship, I am sure Sen. Mourdock will be happy to have them support his policies, and move his (Mourdock’s) bills forward in the Senate.


30 posted on 05/10/2012 7:03:26 AM PDT by RedElement
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

PJ Media is a good crew, so I will be gentle to the author.... but there is no such thing as ‘bipartisanship’. There is either go along with the socialists and Democrats (and you will be called bipartisan), or oppose the socialists and Democrats (and you will be called a reactionary right-winger Teabagger terrorist).


31 posted on 05/10/2012 7:03:51 AM PDT by Lazamataz (To the wall, street occupiers!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

If what we have now is “bipartisanship”, then I want no more of it.

I would actually REJECT the premise that we currently have a Congress that acts with bipartisanship. We have one party whose stated goal is to continuously move this country toward MORE state-controlled dependency. And if other parties go in a different direction, they are deemed radical. I don’t believe that you can establish ANY bipartisanship when one side not only does not budge, but actively works to FUNDAMENTALLY TRANSFORM this country.

When your party uses terms like “Fundamentally Transform”, who is the radical?

And while we are talking bipartisanship, the only time that word is used in Congress is when the Democrats do not have complete power. From 2007-2010, the Republicans were not just ignored, but they were actively LOCKED OUT of legislative discussions.


32 posted on 05/10/2012 7:06:04 AM PDT by Eagle of Liberty (We the People are coming!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I don’t want bipartisanship, I want fist fights on the Senate floor, like in the Taiwanese Parliament.


33 posted on 05/10/2012 7:06:28 AM PDT by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Compromise just results in more socialism and less liberty, but more (R)s mixed in with the (D)s. No thanks.

Drag yerass Lugar. You're next Hatch, Snowe, Graham...


34 posted on 05/10/2012 7:06:28 AM PDT by Sirius Lee (When we cease to be good we'll cease to be great. Be for Goode.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Thoroughly disingenuous as it ignores the fact that the Dems are purging all of their “moderates” as well (Jason Altmeyer here in Pennsylvania being a prime example)


35 posted on 05/10/2012 7:09:08 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

36 posted on 05/10/2012 7:10:28 AM PDT by tomkat ( FU.baraq <font finger=middle>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The party that crammed Obamacare down our throats without a single Republican vote now pretends to be concerned about “bipartisanship”...


37 posted on 05/10/2012 7:10:52 AM PDT by Qbert ("The best defense against usurpatory government is an assertive citizenry" - William F. Buckley, Jr.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Would Kerry and Durbin be speaking so glowingly about compromise and bipartisanship if the Republicans were pushing to eliminate things like the Department of Education, and a few Democrats crossed the aisle to compromise on eliminating only 75% of the department?

No, I don't think so.

38 posted on 05/10/2012 7:12:32 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (You only have three billion heartbeats in a lifetime.How many does the government claim as its own?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The Obama is driving us toward a cliff, and Lugar was among the chorus saying “oh, you might want to slow down a little”. His constituents swapped him out for someone promising to grab the handbrake and yank hard.


39 posted on 05/10/2012 7:18:43 AM PDT by ctdonath2 (Cloud storage? Dropbox rocks! Sign up at http://db.tt/nQqWGd3 for 2GB free (and I get more too).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Bi-Partisanship just means Republicans caving into the the demands of the Democrats. When was the last time you ever heard a Democrat getting praise for working with the Republicans? How about never.

The reason our country is in the sorry shape its in is due to 65 years of the Republicans engaging in Bi-Partisanship. Its way past time for that ship to sail.


40 posted on 05/10/2012 7:23:19 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson