Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

John Roberts -The Worse Conservative Supreme Court Decisions In U.S. History
JoeClarke.Net ^ | 06/29/2012 | JoeClarke.Net

Posted on 06/29/2012 3:37:22 PM PDT by joeclarke

Charles Krauthammeer suggested that John Roberts is playing a sort of catch-up baseball since Roberts feels he needs to protect the image (among liberals, evidently) of the Supreme Court which got bad ratings (like CNN) since 2000, when the Supremes sided with W Bush over Al Gore. Maybe, Krauthammer, the psychiatrist, has gotten into the head of Roberts, but that remains to be seen. We have expected Roberts to act more honorably, as opposed to expecting Elena Kagan, who drafted Obamacare, to recuse herself from making any decision on the matter. I am convinced that most Democrats cannot experience shame or embarrassment, so why would Kagan, a Dem, entertain the thought of doing something honorable?

Another disturbing fact about Roberts,the newly reincarnated embodient of the Reagan appointed, lib-light David Souter, is that his decision to allow Obama's taxation for medication Affordable Care Act, was inspired by lib-heavy Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who convinced Roberts that calling Obamacare a "tax" was a good selling point. Funny, that Roberts cagily hinted that it was bad law, but that he had no power to strike down a bad law, because Congress (Democrats), as representatives of the people, can sort of make anything a law that they choose, according to the Constitution's Welfare Clause Article 1 Section 8. Roberts, like a liberal, overlooked all the fallacies of Obamacare, and refused to count the cost in money or the lies delivered by Obama's Solicitor General who clumsily defended the Affordable Care Act.

Friends of the president, like unions, are exempt, religious institutions are overburdened with unconscionable rules, Nancy Pelosi nor Harry Reid know what is in Obamacare, inventive, book juggling government accountants play fast and loose with government revenues to "pay" for the plan, businesses will shy away from new hiring, and anyone who is uninsured can literally buy health insurance, after an accident, while in the ambulance on the way to the hospital.

And, John Roberts approved of the Obamacare fiasco as a TAX- which Obama vehemently denied. So goes the lesson that when the pop culture and the pop media convince Republicans to hate Bush so much in 2006 that they would give both houses of Congress - the House and the Senate - to the Democrats, expect hell on earth. Roberts, in a "too cute by half" way has, maybe, delivered a NaNa NaNa Na to the electorate through his statement, "This is what the electorate deserves for voting for such dotes (Democrats)" [heavily paraphrased].

Also disappointing has been Chief Justice John Robert's vote against Arizona's self-protective imigration law, as well as his not defending the Stolen Valor Act, which would make it illegal for non veterans to claim that they were decorated veterans.

I don't know what's in Chief Justice John Robert's head, but we are stuck with it until he retires.
There will soon be no doubt about one thing Roberts has done: Obamacare is not only a tax, it will be the largest tax ever issued by a government in history. Let's pray it will be defeated,soon.

[The above huge graphic may be printed on letter sized card stock and sent as a postcard to Justice Roberts at
Justice (or Chief Justice) (Justice's Full Name)
Supreme Court of the United States
One First Street N.E.
Washington, DC 20543
And that's exacly what I plan to do.]


TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: abortion; deathpanels; johnroberts; obamacare; scotus; supremecourt; zerocare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 06/29/2012 3:37:29 PM PDT by joeclarke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: joeclarke

What “conservative opinion”? It was just and opinion, there was nothing “conservative” about it.


2 posted on 06/29/2012 3:41:46 PM PDT by madison10 (Still trying to find that silver lining in that Death of the U.S.A. tornado funnel...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joeclarke

John Roberts= The 21st Century’s version of Roger Taney.


3 posted on 06/29/2012 3:41:53 PM PDT by princeofdarkness (The Obama Administration is circling the wagons. But the Truth Indians are using flaming arrows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joeclarke
Roberts is no Conservative.

He now has a judicial record and it is not good.

4 posted on 06/29/2012 3:42:27 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joeclarke

You know what Roberts’ real problem is? It’s not that he is a liberal. It’s that he’s not much of a man.


5 posted on 06/29/2012 3:42:27 PM PDT by ari-freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joeclarke

“Also disappointing has been Chief Justice John Robert’s vote against Arizona’s self-protective imigration law, as well as his not defending the Stolen Valor Act, which would make it illegal for non veterans to claim that they were decorated veterans.”

You can lie about your military record but you have to be forced into Obamacare. What a country!


6 posted on 06/29/2012 3:45:19 PM PDT by ari-freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joeclarke

Robert evolves like Obama evolves.


7 posted on 06/29/2012 3:47:19 PM PDT by FreedBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedBird
CJR:

""I don't necessarily think that it's the best approach to have an all-encompassing philosophy.""

8 posted on 06/29/2012 3:50:00 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: joeclarke
Anyone that doesn't know the difference between 'worse' and 'worst' is an idiot that isn't worth reading.

/johnny

9 posted on 06/29/2012 3:53:50 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper
Tax - mandate

worse - worst

"“When I use a word,” Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, “it means just what I choose it to mean—neither more nor less.”

“The question is,” said Alice, “whether you can make words mean so many different things.”

“The question is,” said Humpty Dumpty, “which is to be master that’s all.”"

That is all.

10 posted on 06/29/2012 3:58:33 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: madison10

I still believe that his two ADOPTED kids may be ILLEGALLY ADOP{TED and he is being BLACKMILED.......it’s the ONLY answer!! His kida are from Ireland VIA LATIN ALRICA!!! WHY did they have to come thru LATIN ALERICA?????? hmmmm


11 posted on 06/29/2012 4:02:52 PM PDT by Ann Archy ( ABORTION...the HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom

Look into the adoption of his two children....born in Ireland but adopted thru LATIN ALERICA.....answeres all THREE of these HORRIBLE DECISIONS!!!


12 posted on 06/29/2012 4:04:14 PM PDT by Ann Archy ( ABORTION...the HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2
Dodson was a pervert.

/johnny

13 posted on 06/29/2012 4:05:23 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy
I still believe that his two ADOPTED kids may be ILLEGALLY ADOPTED and he is being BLACKMAILED.......it’s the ONLY answer!! His kids are from Ireland VIA LATIN AMERICA!!! WHY did they have to come thru LATIN AMERICA?????? hmmmm

The Catholic church/Catholic adoption agency?

14 posted on 06/29/2012 4:07:34 PM PDT by madison10 (Still trying to find that silver lining in that Death of the U.S.A. tornado funnel...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: madison10

I don;t know but i BELIEVE that his children MAY have been ILLEGALLY ADOPTED and that hi is being BLACK MAILED because of it.


15 posted on 06/29/2012 4:09:56 PM PDT by Ann Archy ( ABORTION...the HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper
Damn shedding catz and breakfast crumbs on the keyboard... There was a 'g' missing in there.

Dodgson was a pervert.

/johnny

16 posted on 06/29/2012 4:12:01 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy

I hear what you are saying, but it would have been insane for a judge to adopt children illegally. He would have known it would cause problems later. Not that Obama and the MSM wouldn’t just SAY the Justice’s children were illegal adoptions, to them if there is an accusation that’s as good as saying the act is true. That idea has ruined many lives.

The adoption was most likely PRIVATE, but not illegal.

If there was blackmail/extortion, I think it would be something else.


17 posted on 06/29/2012 4:14:56 PM PDT by madison10 (Still trying to find that silver lining in that Death of the U.S.A. tornado funnel...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: joeclarke
And, John Roberts approved of the Obamacare fiasco as a TAX- which Obama vehemently denied.

So, if I want to disagree with Roberts, I have to deny it's a tax? If I want t agree with Scalia, I have to deny it's a tax?

Scalia and Obama agree that it's not a tax?

Crazy, crazy, crazy.

18 posted on 06/29/2012 4:20:49 PM PDT by Tau Food (Tom Hoefling for President - 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madison10

Well, we;ll never know now......I can;t believe a PRACTICING CATHOLIC like Roberts could PUSH this bill where EVERYONE will be paying for ABORTIONS!! It is SICKENING, and I would prefer tobelieve that he is beingBLACKMAILED about his kid’s adoption.


19 posted on 06/29/2012 4:44:15 PM PDT by Ann Archy ( ABORTION...the HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: joeclarke

Someone needs to find what offshore account the money went to. Dollar to donuts that cowardly sellout has a new yacht someplace!


20 posted on 06/29/2012 4:59:57 PM PDT by CodeToad (Homosexuals are homophobes. They insist on being called 'gay' instead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson