Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: fieldmarshaldj

No, non-looneytune logic. A vote for a candidate that will receive under 1% of the vote is a vote for a Communist.


48 posted on 07/13/2012 10:52:56 PM PDT by gusty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: gusty
No, a vote for Obama is a vote for Obama. A vote for Romney is a vote for Romney. A vote for a third party candidate is a vote for a third party candidate.

You seem to be more worried about winning than your alleged principles.

/johnny

53 posted on 07/13/2012 10:58:44 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

To: gusty

Baloney.


55 posted on 07/13/2012 10:59:39 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (If you like lying Socialist dirtbags, you'll love Slick Willard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

To: gusty
A vote for a candidate that will receive under 1% of the vote is a vote for a Communist.

Simply not true; unless you mean to assert that my single vote does not count.
But if my single vote does not count, then why do you care who I give it to?

Your argument is actually self-destructive.

56 posted on 07/13/2012 10:59:45 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

To: gusty

No, non-looneytune logic. A vote for a candidate that will receive under 1% of the vote is a vote for a Communist.

By your logic, a vote for a leftist of either major party is two votes for a leftist.


115 posted on 07/14/2012 5:16:47 AM PDT by freedomfiter2 (Brutal acts of commission and yawning acts of omission both strengthen the hand of the devil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

To: gusty; fieldmarshaldj
No, non-looneytune logic. A vote for a candidate that will receive under 1% of the vote is a vote for a Communist.

If you live in WA, OR, CA, MN, IL, NY, NJ, CT, DE, MD, DC, VT, MA, Maine, Hawaii, a vote for Romney -- who won't receive first-place #s in those states -- is a sure vote for a loser in those states. (Remember, unlike other roles, a candidate doesn't win by popular vote; he wins by electoral vote...a state-by-state vote).

Sorry, Gusty. But second-place only counts in horseracing!

Therefore, all, Gusty might be consistent here ... IF he would tell all you voters in the above states that it's "looneytune logic" for you voters in those states to go ahead and vote for a loser (Romney).

141 posted on 07/14/2012 8:36:23 AM PDT by Colofornian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

To: gusty; fieldmarshaldj
No, non-looneytune logic. A vote for a candidate that will receive under 1% of the vote is a vote for a Communist.

Romney's religious track-record re: Communism...see the last column to the right below...and then realize that Romney says he is "faithful" to the faith of his forefathers in the faith!

GOV. Romney Mormon 'scripture' & History Sources Quotes
ObamaCare based upon RomneyCare [SoConPubbie has posted some threads the week of April 16, 2012 along these lines]. In addition, what about Romney's $50 taxpayer-subsidized abortions -- and some $0 abortions -- he permanently imposed a Planned Parenthood rep into supervision of RomneyCare? (Since he vetoed other portions of that legislation, the Planned Parenthood rep section was also something he could have vetoed). For all of the pro-abortion damage done by Romney in the Bay State, see: RomneyCare Now Funding FREE Abortions: A Disqualifier for Mitt Romney’s Candidacy [Enabler Mitt] Mitt's Mormonism embraced socialism/communism under the 'United Order' – sacred commands still on the Mormon “scriptures” – depicted to be “everlasting” commandments of the Mormon god The Mormon socialistic/communistic “everlasting” nature of the “United Order” depicted in Lds “scriptures” – Doctrine & Covenants 82:18-19 and 104:1, 48, 53. Even Lds author George Givens described Brigham Young’s communist-built community of Orderville, Utah as “pure communism”: "When Brigham Young established Orderville and similar United Orders, John Taylor was less than enthusiastic. He realized that enterprises such as Orderville were pure communism and not the law of consecration. He made this plain after he became President, when in 1882 he sent an epistle to all authorities of the Church in which he bluntly stated: 'We had no example of the 'United Order' in accordance with the word of God on the subject...Our relations with the world and our own imperfections prevent the establishment of this system [i.e. the system of consecration and stewardship spoken of at times as the 'United Order'] at the present time, as was stated by Joseph in an early day, it cannot yet be carried out.'" (George W. Givens, 500 More Little-Known Facts in Mormon History, 2004, p. 169)"One of the most famous utopian books ever written was Looking Backward by Edward Bellamy, published in 1889. Some scholars believe Looking Backward had considerable influence in the making of Lenin's Soviet Russia. If this is true, then [ensuing Lds "prophet"] Lorenzo Snow and the Latter-day Saints must receive some of the credit--or blame. Hearing of the success of the United Order in Brigham City, Edward Bellamy made a special trip to Utah in 1886 to study its operation. There he spent three days with Lorenzo Snow, Brigham City's founder and forty-year resident. Impressed with the thirty to forty industries run by its 2,000 inhabitants and the vitality at that time of one of the most successful United Orders, Bellamy returned home and wrote his influential book." (500 More Little-Known Facts in Mormon History, p. 185). Way to go, 19th century Mormon leader-“prophets” of Joseph Smith, Brigham Young, John Taylor & Lorenzo Snow!!! They all unwittingly fueled Soviet Communism!
What about Marion G. Romney, cousin to Mitt's father? Who was he in Lds hierarchy? (Title: 'President' - Top 3 of church as 2nd counselor to both #11 & #12 Lds 'prophets') (Things As They Really Are, p. 73). Cited in official Lds publication, Search the Commandments: Melchizedek Priesthood Personal Study Guide, pp. 275-276 (1984) "Elder Neal A. Maxwell has said: 'Following the living prophets is something that must be done in all seasons and circumstances. We must be like President Marion G. Romney, who humbly said, '..I have never hesitated to follow the counsel of the Authorities of the Church even though it crossed my social, professional, and political life' (Conference Report, April 1941, p. 123). There are, or will be moments when prophetic declarations collide with our pride or our seeming personal interests...Do I believe in the living prophet even when he speaks on matters affecting me and my specialty directly? Or do I stop sustaining the prophet when his words fall in my territory? if the latter, the prophet is without honor in our country!

"I believe in my Mormon faith and I endeavor to live by it. My faith is the faith of my fathers - I will be true to them and to my beliefs." - Mitt Romney

Source: Transcript: Mitt Romney's Faith Speech
144 posted on 07/14/2012 8:54:47 AM PDT by Colofornian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson