.
Posted on 07/19/2012 5:28:21 PM PDT by Seizethecarp
On target again...Thanks.
BO has run for, and served in, the offices of the Illinois House and the United States Senate.
Both offices require U.S. citizenship for eligibility.
What sort of proof of U.S. citizenship (if any) did BO provide when he ran for and served in the above offices?
It was Prince Charles who visited on May 2, 2011. He Visited Supeme Court and an urban farm, “Common Good”. Per the Washington Post.
If the key events concerning Obama’s parents, relocations, likely adoptions, likely guardianship changes, etc. are anywhere near accurate (and I am not saying they are) then the records would have been altered numerous times between 1961 and 1983.
To avoid all this messyness the easy way to go to use a COLB that is only a basic computer print out with no original images. And that was the first attempt.
Only when Trump pushed for LFBC did it come out 3 years later.
The only way to unravel the facts would be to revese the cards and put them back in the deck in the correct order. An individual document (or card) is worthless at this point. If you have ever seen a dealer ‘back out’ a hand of blackjack at a table it is impressive. That is what needs to happen here for anything to make sense.
None that I am aware of.
When it comes to President you have to be a natural born Citizen. Natural born Citizens would not have explicit citizenship paperwork. This is the meaning of being a natural born Citizen - you need no man made law and no amendment and no explicit paperwork to be or show you are a citizen.
A naturalized citizen of course would have forms and papers and documents.
The cover-up that may be bigger than the actual events of birth may very well be the cover-up of naturalization papers for Obama. Again, since at any one point-in-time a person can be a natural born citizen or a naturalized citizen any evidence of naturalization would disqualify a candidate from the office of President.
Right.
My point is: BO would have had to provide SOME proof of citizenship to have been eligible for his prior offices (unless through some dark process all requirements for him were waived). He would have had to have provided a birth certificate, naturalization papers, etc., right? Unless the citizenship (not natural born citizenship) requirement for those prior offices exists on paper only and is never actually enforced.
Requirements for office are rarely even thought about unless a challenge has been made. Even if someone would have wanted to challenge B.O.’s credentials, remember he has the backing of the Chicago mob. No need to prove credentials, answer to authority, or obey the law.
Outting the usurper won’t cause CWII but let the internet and cell phone service get interupted or credit cards and ATMs go down and those once sleepy lazy Americans will fly off their couches. I’d say the vast majority of those OWS, Union and Black Panther thugs and Obama’s civil army mmmmm (after a few outbursts) will miss the good life after about a week and come to our side.
As for a CWII brought on by an economic crisis, that may come about any day. In fact, imo, we may have a WWIII over the economy. Soros and his little puppet will probably have a hand in it since Soros made out like a bandit during WWII.
This last election was scary. Palin was shut down. McBlame ended up pimping for him with all his “you don’t have to be afraid of Obama. Congress and the states not stepping up to the vetting plate and now SCOTUS “evading” the issue. For certain, Hillary was taken aside by someone who had more on her than she had on Hussein. Hopefully, she has her insurance stashed in a couple dozen places around the world only because I want this BC thing settled in my lifetime.
Our system is designed to operate with honorable men and women doing things in honorable ways.
It is not designed to deal with an viral enemy that is in under the wire and operating within the system. The safeguards are not there.
Hence why an enemy within the system - once exposed - must be deal with harshly.
FR mail
It is not designed to deal with an viral enemy that is in under the wire and operating within the system. The safeguards are not there.
Hence why an enemy within the system - once exposed - must be deal with harshly.
Exactly right.
Most likely because none of the offices he ran for required much more than residency and/or citizenship proof. Wave a drivers’ license, passport or the previous year’s 1040 and that should do it. The senate bumps up the requirement to 9 years US citizen but a passport would do for that. At no point would he have to bring out his BC.
Even with the passport, he’s had one all his life so who’s to question a US passport? Even the passport office wouldn’t have bothered looking at his documents but just stamped “renewed” every few years. Once he got that first one as a little kid, he was home free.
They actually didn’t verify ANY birth facts. Verification of the facts is a certification that the birth event happened as described by the applicant for the verification. That’s what was required by the application form, and none of the items from that form were verified.
In addition to requesting verification of the birth FACTS on the application form, though, Ken Bennett also requested verification that some other items are actually on the birth record. Onaka did verify that those items are on the birth record, but that’s not the same thing as verifying that those facts are TRUE. If the birth facts were claimed on a legally non-valid record, Onaka would verify that the claims were on the record they have but would refuse to verify any of those actual birth facts as true. Which is exactly what Onaka did.
The statute (HRS 338-14.3) doesn’t give Onaka discretion to just ignore some facts that are requested to be verified. If the claimed fact is acknowledged by HI as probative/legally true, then he HAS to verify those facts. Onaka refused to verify any of those facts.
It also requires him to verify any other information regarding the vital event which the applicant requests to be verified. Bennett asked him to verify that the other claims from the online BC are on the record they have (stuff like BC#, date filed, etc) - and Onaka verified that they are. Bennett also asked Onaka to verify that Obama’s posted long-form is a “true and accurate representation of the original record on file”, and Onaka refused to verify that.
What it comes down to is that Onaka verified that the claims on the forged long-form are the same as what they have in the record but he CANNOT verify that any of those claims are true or that what Obama posted is a true and accurate representation of the original. The only legal reason for Onaka’s response - allowable by HRS 338-14.3 - is that the record they have for Obama is not legally valid.
.
Thank you.
Yeah, i know- i found and posted a link about that date somewhere— I’ll try to hunt it up— there was a blogger who did some really good research on that
What’s going on here? The link you posted is a dead-set copy of Freeper Ladysforest blog:
http://island-adv.com/2011/03/obama-eligibility-this-could-change-it-all/
Sure is fred-
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.