To democrats - the “war on women” means the government should pay for birth control and abortions.
I hope they run with this issue. I hope they do.
amazing how rep women are so much better looking
If this idiot is not capable of handling her life and needs a condom to protect herself because she is afraid that the idiot she is sleeping with is not healthy or an idiot she can call me.
I will give her a couple of quarters so she can go down to the service station and buy a fancy condom. God, i would not want any of her offspring in this world.
See, it won’t cost the government (taxpayer) anything. We really don’t need any of these idiots to reproduce.
Rush is right, she is a whore.
Blessings, bobo
Sandra Fluke - Putting the “harlot” in “Charlotte”.
Please,stop spreading the falsehood that she testified before congress.She testified before a house oversight committee.
I’m tired of the adulation afforded this little nobody.
Another orchestrated moment by the Obama administration.
We will have to look at this woman for the next 30 yrs as she glides into prominence in the Democrat party.
It is so amazing that after decades of the “if it feels good do it” movement shouting about keeping government out of the bedroom they want us to pay for everything which goes on or comes out of that same bedroom.
AIDS, abortions, contraceptives, and if all those “failed” pay for their kids they did not want.
We have to get some wordsmiths on the right to counter these dregs of society.
it is a pathetic state of affairs when a non-entity like Sandra Fluke is chosen to deliver a seminal speech at THE convention of a “major” political party. She will NOT go over well with any of the “undecideds”, but will instead come across as a classic special-interest whiner, bitching and moaning over what she and her compatriots think they’re “owed” by society at large. I hope she receives the ridicule she so richly deserves.
just Fluke it, is their motto
Fluke is a vicious evil social parasite. She intentionally enrolled in a Catholic school for the specific purpose of desecrating and destroying their moral principles.
This thirtysomething-year-old giant Code Pink walking vagina has an ugly lesbian looking demeanor. She will never hold an honest job or function any useful capacity in society. She’s a professional Democratic Party lamprey, sucking the life out of useful and functioning real human beings.
All in all, I can’t think of a more perfect speaker at the Democratic national convention. She’s the perfect epitome of this corrupt, evil criminal organization.
As pointed out above, Fluke never testified before Congress (she was rightfully denied as a witness by the Republicans under the 72-hour rule for naming witnesses; the Democrats tried to slip her in at 4:45 p.m. the evening before the actual hearing.
However, what you remember 'correctly' has nothing whatsoever to do with what Fluke said. Fluke began her statement by saying she was speaking for other woman and not herself. She then told the specific (and in most cases, ridiculous) stories of six other women. Fluke never said a word about her sex life, whether she used contraceptives, or the cost of her contraceptives, or the cost or number of condoms that anybody used. If you think she did, then you should read a transcript of her statement.
Seriously, hers is the face of the Democrat party? A woman known for wanting someone to pay for her birth control — AND ONLY BECAUSE OF A POORLY WORDED REMARK BY RUSH LIMBAUGH.
Was that really what her testimony was about?
I thought Fluke's testimoney was about supposed unnamed friends of hers who were denied oral contraceptives for theraputic use (even though Georgetown U's plan covered them for theraputic use).
Anyone know?
is monica Lewinskey speaking? Genifer Flowers Anita Broaderick etc
Many think the government is their baby daddy and get po’d when they get caught spending government money on hairdos, manicures, liquor and cigs, not to mention gambling and vacations.
Shows the world what low values they have.
Fluke’s testimony
http://abcnews.go.com/images/Politics/statement-Congress-letterhead-2nd%20hearing.pdf
There is nothing in there about condoms.
There is plenty in there to argue with. A big one for me is her testimony was mostly hearsay. She refers over and over to anonymous people who have said this and that happened to them ... but there is no way of checking any of these stories out. I don’t consider that valid evidence to back up what she is saying.