Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Photobucket
1 posted on 09/03/2012 1:56:28 PM PDT by xuberalles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: xuberalles

To democrats - the “war on women” means the government should pay for birth control and abortions.

I hope they run with this issue. I hope they do.


2 posted on 09/03/2012 1:58:31 PM PDT by 2banana (My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xuberalles

amazing how rep women are so much better looking


4 posted on 09/03/2012 2:02:02 PM PDT by hecht (restore Hetch-Hetchy, and screw San Francisco and Pelosi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xuberalles

If this idiot is not capable of handling her life and needs a condom to protect herself because she is afraid that the idiot she is sleeping with is not healthy or an idiot she can call me.

I will give her a couple of quarters so she can go down to the service station and buy a fancy condom. God, i would not want any of her offspring in this world.

See, it won’t cost the government (taxpayer) anything. We really don’t need any of these idiots to reproduce.

Rush is right, she is a whore.

Blessings, bobo


6 posted on 09/03/2012 2:05:57 PM PDT by bobo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xuberalles

Sandra Fluke - Putting the “harlot” in “Charlotte”.


8 posted on 09/03/2012 2:08:55 PM PDT by dfwgator (I'm voting for Ryan and that other guy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xuberalles

Please,stop spreading the falsehood that she testified before congress.She testified before a house oversight committee.
I’m tired of the adulation afforded this little nobody.
Another orchestrated moment by the Obama administration.
We will have to look at this woman for the next 30 yrs as she glides into prominence in the Democrat party.


9 posted on 09/03/2012 2:09:51 PM PDT by peteyd (A dog may bite you in the ass,but it will never stab you in the back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xuberalles

10 posted on 09/03/2012 2:10:22 PM PDT by unique1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xuberalles

It is so amazing that after decades of the “if it feels good do it” movement shouting about keeping government out of the bedroom they want us to pay for everything which goes on or comes out of that same bedroom.

AIDS, abortions, contraceptives, and if all those “failed” pay for their kids they did not want.

We have to get some wordsmiths on the right to counter these dregs of society.


12 posted on 09/03/2012 2:17:28 PM PDT by Wurlitzer (Nothing says "ignorance" like Islam!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xuberalles

13 posted on 09/03/2012 2:18:46 PM PDT by dfwgator (I'm voting for Ryan and that other guy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xuberalles

it is a pathetic state of affairs when a non-entity like Sandra Fluke is chosen to deliver a seminal speech at THE convention of a “major” political party. She will NOT go over well with any of the “undecideds”, but will instead come across as a classic special-interest whiner, bitching and moaning over what she and her compatriots think they’re “owed” by society at large. I hope she receives the ridicule she so richly deserves.


14 posted on 09/03/2012 2:19:00 PM PDT by supremedoctrine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xuberalles

just Fluke it, is their motto


17 posted on 09/03/2012 2:28:10 PM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xuberalles

Fluke is a vicious evil social parasite. She intentionally enrolled in a Catholic school for the specific purpose of desecrating and destroying their moral principles.

This thirtysomething-year-old giant Code Pink walking vagina has an ugly lesbian looking demeanor. She will never hold an honest job or function any useful capacity in society. She’s a professional Democratic Party lamprey, sucking the life out of useful and functioning real human beings.

All in all, I can’t think of a more perfect speaker at the Democratic national convention. She’s the perfect epitome of this corrupt, evil criminal organization.


18 posted on 09/03/2012 2:28:11 PM PDT by FormerACLUmember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xuberalles
If you remember correctly, Fluke was the thirty year-old, feminist student at Georgetown who testified before Congress as a supposed victim of economic discrimination; i.e., Georgetown’s most affordable health plan – an annual $1559 policy - didn’t cover her need for “condoms” because oral contraceptives were not safe.

As pointed out above, Fluke never testified before Congress (she was rightfully denied as a witness by the Republicans under the 72-hour rule for naming witnesses; the Democrats tried to slip her in at 4:45 p.m. the evening before the actual hearing.

However, what you remember 'correctly' has nothing whatsoever to do with what Fluke said. Fluke began her statement by saying she was speaking for other woman and not herself. She then told the specific (and in most cases, ridiculous) stories of six other women. Fluke never said a word about her sex life, whether she used contraceptives, or the cost of her contraceptives, or the cost or number of condoms that anybody used. If you think she did, then you should read a transcript of her statement.

20 posted on 09/03/2012 2:33:02 PM PDT by Scoutmaster (You knew the job was dangerous when you took it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xuberalles

Seriously, hers is the face of the Democrat party? A woman known for wanting someone to pay for her birth control — AND ONLY BECAUSE OF A POORLY WORDED REMARK BY RUSH LIMBAUGH.


21 posted on 09/03/2012 2:35:17 PM PDT by Tanniker Smith (Rome didn't fall in a day, either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xuberalles

23 posted on 09/03/2012 2:36:22 PM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xuberalles
Fluke and Mia Love:


27 posted on 09/03/2012 2:43:58 PM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xuberalles
Fluke was the thirty year-old, feminist student at Georgetown who testified before Congress as a supposed victim of economic discrimination; i.e., Georgetown’s most affordable health plan – an annual $1559 policy - didn’t cover her need for “condoms” because oral contraceptives were not safe.

Was that really what her testimony was about?

I thought Fluke's testimoney was about supposed unnamed friends of hers who were denied oral contraceptives for theraputic use (even though Georgetown U's plan covered them for theraputic use).

Anyone know?

32 posted on 09/03/2012 3:30:13 PM PDT by Lorianne (fedgov, taxporkmoney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xuberalles

is monica Lewinskey speaking? Genifer Flowers Anita Broaderick etc


35 posted on 09/03/2012 4:02:31 PM PDT by philly-d-kidder (AB-Sheen"The truth is the truth if nobody believes it,a lie is still a lie, everybody believes it")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xuberalles

Many think the government is their baby daddy and get po’d when they get caught spending government money on hairdos, manicures, liquor and cigs, not to mention gambling and vacations.


36 posted on 09/03/2012 4:12:39 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xuberalles
Great move on the part of the dems. - to have this lady of easy virtue front and center at their convention.

Shows the world what low values they have.

41 posted on 09/03/2012 4:55:13 PM PDT by Churchillspirit (9/11/2001. NEVER FORGET.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: xuberalles; All

Fluke’s testimony

http://abcnews.go.com/images/Politics/statement-Congress-letterhead-2nd%20hearing.pdf

There is nothing in there about condoms.

There is plenty in there to argue with. A big one for me is her testimony was mostly hearsay. She refers over and over to anonymous people who have said this and that happened to them ... but there is no way of checking any of these stories out. I don’t consider that valid evidence to back up what she is saying.


43 posted on 09/03/2012 5:15:51 PM PDT by Lorianne (fedgov, taxporkmoney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson