Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"Rogue"U.S. General Arrested for Activating Special Forces Teams; Ignoring Libya Stand-Down Order
Tea Party Tribune ^ | 2012-10-29 11:25:35 | PinkTeaPatriot

Posted on 10/29/2012 12:12:26 PM PDT by tselatysr

The official story surrounding the events of September 11, 2012 in Bengzahi, Libya which left four Americans dead, has now officially fallen apart.

After numerous flips and flops by the Obama administration, which originally attempted to paint the incident as a Muslim outcry over an anti-Islamic video, whistle blowers throughout the U.S. government, including within the White House, the State Department, national intelligence agencies and the U.S.military have made available stunning details that suggest not only did operational commanders have live visual and audio communications from drones overhead and intelligence assets on the ground, but that some commanders within the military were prepared to go-it-alone after being told to "stand down."

Africom commanding officer U.S. General Carter Ham, after being ordered to essentially surrender control of the situation to alleged Al Queda terrorists and let Americans on the ground die, made the unilateral decision to ignore orders from the Secretary of Defense and activated special operations teams at his disposal for immediate deployment to the area.

According to reports, once the General went rogue he was arrested within minutes by his second in command and relieved of duty.

"(The) basic principle is that you don't deploy forces into harm's way without knowing what's going on; without having some real-time information about what's taking place," Panetta told Pentagon reporters. "And as a result of not having that kind of information, the commander who was on the ground in that area, Gen. Ham, Gen. Dempsey and I felt very strongly that we could not put forces at risk in that situation."

The information I heard today was that General Ham as head of Africom received the same e-mails the White House received requesting help/support as the attack was taking place. General Ham immediately had a rapid response unit ready and communicated to the Pentagon that he had a unit ready.

General Ham then received the order to stand down. His response was to screw it, he was going to help anyhow. Within 30 seconds to a minute after making the move to respond, his second in command apprehended General Ham and told him that he was now relieved of his command.

The question now is whether the American people will hold to account the chain of command responsible for leaving our people behind, fabricating a politically expedient story, and continuing to sell the now defunct lie(s) even after all of their variations of the story were found to be false and misleading.

A General who made the decision to assist diplomatic and intelligence assets on the ground has been arrested and will likely be retired or worse, while those who ordered the removal of embassy security details and ordered U.S. forces to stand-down are left to go on about their business and likely risk more American lives in the future.

In some circles the actions of those at the very top of the command structure during the Bengzahi attacks would be considered traitorous.

 

Delivered by The Daily Sheeple

 


Contributed by M. Frank Drover of The Daily Sheeple.

M. Frank Drover is a co-editor and contributor for The Daily Sheeple, an alternative media hub for leading headlines, head lies, opinion, and commentary. Wake the flock up!

This content may be freely reproduced in full or in part in digital form with full attribution to the author and a link to www.TheDailySheeple.com.

2012-10-29 07:21:14

Source: http://www.thedailysheeple.com/rogue-u-s-general-arrested-for-activating-special-forces-teams-ignoring-libya-stand-down-order_102012

Article shared using the Free Republish tool on Tea Party Tribune.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: benghazigate; bengzahi; carterham; generalham; libya; socom; sof; teapartytribune
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 last
To: KeyLargo
He was relived of duty as soon as he ordered the troops to respond. My guess is that his 2nd in command already had orders to do that. Here is the official link to where Obama nominated his 2nd in command, General Rodriguez as the Next Africa Command Chief.

http://www.defense.gov//News/NewsArticle.aspx?ID=118259

61 posted on 10/29/2012 9:33:10 PM PDT by spcopsofc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: tselatysr

This story is just NOT true. While it wouldn’t surprise me if this kind of thing did happen, in this case it did NOT.

General Ham hasn’t been relieved of duty yet and was NEVER arrested. He addressed a group of cadets at an ROTC luncheon on Oct. 22nd AS the commander of U.S. Africa Command. http://www.africom.mil/getArticle.asp?art=8397&am


62 posted on 10/30/2012 7:59:11 AM PDT by BootsOfEscaping
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tselatysr

On 10/30/2012 11:08:46 AM, AFRICOM PAO in Stuttgart, Germany said:
Thank you for all the comments and questions. We are aware of the rumors surrounding General Ham’s upcoming departure, and the assumptions are false. General Carter F. Ham is currently the commander of U.S. Africa Command. Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta’s announced intention on October 18 to nominate Army General David M. Rodriguez to succeed General Ham followed leadership succession deliberations that took place well before the incident of 9/11/12.

General Martin E. Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, addressed this issue: “The speculation that General Carter Ham is departing Africa Command (AFRICOM) due to events in Benghazi, Libya, on 11 September 2012 is absolutely false. General Ham’s departure is part of routine succession planning that has been on going since July. He continues to serve in AFRICOM with my complete confidence.”

You can read more here: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/oct/29/dempsey-hits-rumors-about-africom-chiefs-departure/

http://www.africom.mil/getArticle.asp?art=8383&;


63 posted on 10/30/2012 11:50:17 AM PDT by FormerlyAnotherLurker (Barrett M82A1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Treason? How about treason and murder-1.


64 posted on 11/14/2012 11:01:45 PM PST by lkorrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson