Posted on 10/30/2012 4:52:51 PM PDT by Blogger
The first possibility that occurred to me immediately was that this was a kidnapping setup to erase the Iranian hostage fiasco by the kenyan quickly and brilliantly negotiating the release of the Ambassador. That was helped by hearing that the Amb. was dead when the mozzies got to him, possibly from smoke inhalation or such so it didn’t come off right. As more information drizzled in(too much for “seep”) it looked more and more lìke the gun running thing is abetter guess. Both maybe? Not impossible.
Neither arming Jihadists nor letting them run roughshod over the US is a good idea in the long run.
Informed assertions.
I worked directly for Pat Kennedy for three years. I understand what is in the building.
Maybe yes, maybe no, but not convincing assertions.
If Beck is saying this then you know it is crap. Was he crying when he said it? The guy is a phony that discovered a way to fame an fortune.
Of course, and point appreciated and well taken.
Uh, I don’t think that makes us better. If someone commits a crime, which it appears the President has done (obstruction of justice comes to mind), we have a system of justice that should not allow him to go free. President or no President. We are all equal under the law and that is what makes America different and better.
As to whether or not Beck is right, I don’t know. His story is plausible. Obama is clearly covering up what really happened. It may have nothing to do with gun running. Several other plausible explanations come to mind as well. Still, the President is not above the law.
This congress and the next if it be Republican will likely do nothing. But when you say impeachment and elections are our way, remember impeachment has criminal penalties. Nixon was pardoned, but not formally impeached. Obama could be impeached and tried. Doubtful he would be convicted because of the civil unrest which would ensue. But it is not un-American to think of trying him criminally.
“It would be nice.....but aint gonna happen.”
Whether it does, or does not happen is not the question, should it happen?
Beck makes a compelling case, but there can be no holes in that case, and there is some speculation in that presentation.
There can be none.
Be specific
Reread your own posts. You have proven nothing and have provided no evidence for anything you asserted. Believe him. Don’t believe him. At this point, I don’t care. I posted the comment and you all can do with it what you want to.
These radio and TV shouters (I don’t know which, I don’t follow any of them) just feed their audience’s videogame fantasies, knowing well enough that none of their predictions and wild wishes have any chance to pass. Advertisers, in the meantime, make sales.
“I agree with everyone’s feeling that if ever we consider “more than un-electing” any President , this jerk is deserving.”
Ditto
“The first possibility that occurred to me immediately was that this was a kidnapping setup to erase the Iranian hostage fiasco by the kenyan quickly...]
This is plausible as I’m sure the Kenyan would expect that the few Americans there would not be likely to fight back against an armed mob.
His first mistake.
43 trillion lawsuit—eric holder 1 of 25 defendants
http://www.cnbc.com/id/49250473/NY_Mortgage_Suit_Against_JPMorgan_Could_Be_Model_for_Future_Cases
defendant list
http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2012/10/spire-law-group-43-trillion-law-suit-defendant-list-2486742.html
LOL. Empty talk. I stand by everything I have said and can back it up. Give me a specific and I will address it.
The trouble I see is like the Senate “Super Majority”. Once the Pubbies talked about changing the rule (nuclear option), the dirty dems will use it politically. Same with prosecution of a President, if conservatives broached the subject, the damn dems would do it, most likely for politics, then its tit for tat until its CW2.
That does not equate to a President’s underlings, going after them can affect the next President to think of the consequences.
Beck is sometimes a fun entertainer, but aside from an occassional hit, he’s not routinely to be taken too seriously. His attraction is he sometimes also says what some conservatives think or fear.
LOL
I can’t define it, but I know pornography when I see it. And that’s my kind of porn!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.