Posted on 01/03/2013 12:29:36 PM PST by butterdezillion
I just found out that all the faxes I sent to the Republican members of Congress have been referred to just the 3 Congress-critters who represent me. I need everybody to contact your own Congress members and let them know that Hawaii registrar Alvin Onaka has certified to AZ SOS Ken Bennett that Obama's Hawaii birth certificate is not legally valid.
Bennett asked Onaka to verify, among other things, that Obama, male, was born on Aug 4, 1961, in Honolulu on Oahu to Stanley Ann Dunham and Barack Hussein Obama. According to Hawaii law, Onaka has to verify any submitted information if he can certify that the birth actually happened that way. And though Onaka verified that the claims on the White House image are claimed on the record they've got, he did not verify the truth of any of those facts. The only lawful reason for that is if the record they have is not legally valid.
You can see the documentation for all this at http://butterdezillion.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/complete-klayman-letter-to-bauer.pdf
Two other verifications (to MDEC and to KS SOS Kris Kobach) are also consistent with a non-valid record. Onaka has been willing to say that the claims that are actually on the White House image "match" the claims on the record but is NOT willing to say that the information is "identical" or that the White House image is a "true and accurate representation of the original record on file". His refusal to verify what he was specifically asked is his confirmation that those things are NOT true. It is NOT a true and accurate representation of the original record and the information in it is NOT identical to the information in the real record. IOW, the White House image is a forgery.
Which is what affidavits by Sheriff Joe Arpaio and his Cold Case Posse commander, Mike Zullo, also say.
This fits with the 1960-64 birth index being altered to include non-valid records (which I've proven in an affidavit filed for a NE criminal case). And a bunch of other evidence too.
The long and short of it is this: Hawaii has officially certified that they cannot verify Obama's date of birth, city and island of birth, and parents' names. Those are critical to eligibility. With no legally-established birth facts, there is nobody who can certify that Obama is eligible, and every Official Certification of Nomination that Bob Bauer sent to the state SOS's to get Obama on the ballot are fraudulent at best.
IOW, every electoral vote that Obama got was the result of legally-acknowledged (by Hawaii) fraud.
We need the members of Congress to know that every electoral vote for Obama that they accept tomorrow is a vote to accept known criminal behavior.
Please help me get this word out to everybody, since the "machine" will only let me contact 3 people, and I've already done that. We need one Senator and one Representative to object to all the known-fraudulent electoral votes for Barack Obama.
What's your purpose in, essentially, egging people on here for something you know damn well will never happen?
Again, what are you afraid of?
Psalm 37:28 For the LORD loves the just and will not forsake his faithful ones. They will be protected forever, but the offspring of the wicked will be cut off.
Is this about your blog? Getting hits?
In any event, what makes you so sure that a court will order the release of Barry's CLN record (if it exists)?
After all these years of numerous attempts to get after any of his records and with all courts shutting those attempts down at the front door...why now? Why would they allow discovery?
You appear to beleive such an outcome is realistic. What makes you think so?
FWIW
Virginia Sunahara COLB
http://www.wnd.com/files/2012/09/SUNAHARA-short-form-COLB.jpg
Stig Waidelich COLB
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2722377/replies?c=182
How did you get that FR link to go straight from comment 182 to comment 190, without any of the rest of the thread showing?
By a Google search for “Stig Waidelich birth certificate”. One of the search results comes up:
View Replies - Free Republic
freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2722377/replies?c=182
May 20, 2011 – The information regarding Stig Waidelich’s birth certificate number is available from multiple sources on the web, and no one has ever ...
I would guess that when someone clicks the “view replies” button on a FR comment, the FR software compiles the replies to that comment on a web page with its own url. That page then joins all the billions of pages that exist on the internet and is searchable by search engines like Google.
Although when I just tried it using BING, the “View Replies - Free Republic” wasn’t one of the results. So maybe it’s just magic.
Probably a Free Republic Platinum Club feature.
Click on the “View Replies” and when the page loads, copy the address from your window browser and then paste that address as the link.
From your last post at #326:
EX.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2974657/replies?c=326
If you want to direct someone to a specific post in a thread then click on the post number.
In your case click on #326. When the page loads copy the address from your browser and paste it where you want as the link.
The whole thread will show but it will direct people to the specific post. Saves time.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2974657/posts?page=326#326
EX.
326 posted on Wednesday, January 09, 2013 8:50:38 AM by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 325 | View Replies | Report Abuse]
Wow. There were enough people clicking to see the replies to that particular post, that the URL to view replies came up in a Google search. Who’da thunk it?
After I posted the question I realized that the URL was for replies to a post so I figured that’s how this combination of posts was possible. I wonder why there were so many searches for replies to that particular post. Apparently more people searched for the response to that post than even found the Waidelich BC image through all other means, unless you clicked on a Google item that was lower down on the search results than the link to just that post.
Weird.
Thanks. I’ve used that before, just not from the “View Replies” screen. So that’s what surprised me.
“unless you clicked on a Google item that was lower down on the search results than the link to just that post.”
The FR post was the fourth or fifth result in the Google search for “Stig Waidelich birth certificates” and it was the first one that had the actual image. The combination of “Stig” and “Waidelich” is so unique there were only about 3000 results total. A lot of those are in the comments section of articles that deal with Obama’s birth certificate.
I would say yes, the cups on the table are the same, her blouse is the same. The person to the left of Michelle Obama in the light blue or turquoise shirt is in both pictures. Does that mean this wasn’t at the White House at a dinner given by Hillary Clinton to give an award to Michelle Obama?
Well, they must have been at the same event, but now we need to know which one is correct?
It wouldn’t be the first time I’ve seen an image cropped and shown with a different date.
And Edward Said’s presence isn’t any guide:
EDWARD SAID:
Born: November 1, 1935, Jerusalem
Died: September 25, 2003, New York City
Spouse: Mariam Said
http://crankynotions.com/2012/09/30/obama-edward-said-and-the-politics-of-identity-2/
seems to be it...
obumpa
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.