Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: mylife

Actually according to US vs Miller in order for a firearm to be protected by the 2nd it must have a militarily useful purpose.


15 posted on 01/18/2013 8:32:20 PM PST by Kadric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Kadric

I think they are ALL protected, but I get the gist of your point.


17 posted on 01/18/2013 8:34:45 PM PST by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Kadric
Actually according to US vs Miller in order for a firearm to be protected by the 2nd it must have a militarily useful purpose.

Excellent point! Makes you wonder why the ATF "regulates" short barreled shotguns, no? Remington makes model 870 shotguns w/ an 11" barrel and sells them as NFA items.

Regards,
GtG

27 posted on 01/18/2013 9:31:32 PM PST by Gandalf_The_Gray (I live in my own little world, I like it 'cuz they know me here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Kadric

That was an idiotic ruling and travesty of justice which has since been overturned, or partially so. They even got it wrong by their own standards, considering the sort of shotguns outlawed by the law under scrutiny were used in WWI.

By the way, what the heck isn’t a useful weapon of war? That could be anything from nukes to Molotov cocktails to rocks.


35 posted on 01/19/2013 12:37:45 AM PST by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson