You claim that all scientists are in agreement that the C-14 test results are invalid, and that is NOT the case. Perhaps you should try reading articles from journals other than the, “Evangelical Holy Jesus Shroud Monthly.”
Again, you devolve to ad hominem attack. I have read far more scientific and scholarly articles on the Shroud from all sorts of sources than you, including those from the skeptical sources, yet you choose to attack me and attribute statements to me that I have not made. I am not responsible for the opinions of "all scientists" but I do know that any REAL scientist with an open mind who examines the facts of this case would have to agree the C14 test is invalid. your snarky statements are not those of an unbiased scientist but those of a person who has a pre-concluded goal in mind that all research MUST prove or if it falls toward authenticity it must, by your definition, be pseudo-science and the researcher, because of what he found, a pseudoscientist, and damned. More ad hominem
You see, BlueDragon? THIS is what we put up with... after numerous responses and numerous links with the links to proof, he STILL repeats the outdated twaddle that the C14 test is still valid after five independent researchers using five different approaches have shown it can't be. . . and EIGHT YEARS have passed with those falsifications standing and with out them being disproved! All we see is the skeptics foaming at the mouth and denying the work is valid because it and the researchers involved in pseudoscience.
And he still brings up Walter C. McCrone and his claims of seeing PAINT in his microscope 29 years after he has been conclusively falsified by far better instrumentation and specialists working in their fields and multiple peer-reviewed published articles showing no pigments associated at all with image or blood stains (including McCrone's own damning admission he blocked his own Electron Microscopy Department from falsifying his conclusions!)