Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fannie/Freddie Could See $51 Billion Profit … IF They Remain Under Gov’t Control For 10 Years
Confounded Interest ^ | 04/11/2013 | Anthony B. Sanders

Posted on 04/11/2013 11:21:45 AM PDT by whitedog57

Jon Prior at Politico reports that according to budget projections released Wednesday, taxpayers could see “a $51 billion profit on the $187 billion in federal funds that have been pumped into” Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac “since they were taken over by the government in 2008.”

The catch? Fannie and Freddie would have to remain under government control for another 10 years.

Wait a minute. If taxpayers spend $187 to bailout Fannie and Freddie, a $51 billion profit over ten years still leaves taxpayers in the hole for $136 billion. Politico is making it sound like a tremendous return on taxpayer return on investment. It isn’t — it would still cost taxpayers $136 billion over ten years AND the government would still control them.

The Fannie/Freddie model of privatized gains and socialized costs (e.g., the $187 billion bailout) was an abysmal failure. It is an example of how the public-private model is a dangerous concept since political agendas can subvert and destroy the model. So the allure of a public-private model “making profits for taxpayers” conveniently forgets the $187 billion in losses that they accumulated.

Having said that, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are very good at what they do. It is a question of decoupling them from the public-private partnership model.

The Federal Housing Finance Agency today directed Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to extend the Home Affordable Refinance Program (HARP) by two years to December 31, 2015. The program was set to expire December 31, 2013.

FHFA will soon launch a nationwide campaign to inform homeowners about HARP. This campaign will educate consumers about HARP and its eligibility requirements and motivate them to explore their options and utilize HARP before the program ends. HARP is uniquely designed to allow borrowers who owe more than their home is worth the opportunity to refinance their mortgage. Extending the program will continue to provide borrowers opportunities to refinance, give clear guidance to lenders and reduce risk for Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and taxpayers.

To be eligible for a HARP refinance homeowners must meet the following criteria:  The loan must be owned or guaranteed by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac.  The mortgage must have been sold to Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac on or before May 31, 2009.  The mortgage cannot have been refinanced under HARP previously unless it is a Fannie Mae loan that was refinanced under HARP from March-May, 2009.  The current loan-to-value (LTV) ratio must be greater than 80 percent.  The borrower must be current on their mortgage payments with no late payments in the last six months and no more than one late payment in the last 12 months.

This is the problem with the Fannie/Freddie model. A regulator like FHFA can intervened in the business decisions of two corporations, even if it helps more households to get out of negative equity.

To be sure, The Federal Reserve can always backstop Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and member banks. And Congress/Administration can always bailout troubled corporations. But linking a private corporations to political agendas is a recipe for disaster.

The good news? Serious delinquencies (90+ days) are declining.

And the housing market is improving.

Hence, Fannie and Freddie will see improvement in profits (especially if employment improves). But they would be better off without the shackles and chains of government housing policies.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: fannie; fhfa; freddie; housing
Get rid of Fannie and Freddie!!!!!!!!!!!!
1 posted on 04/11/2013 11:21:45 AM PDT by whitedog57
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: whitedog57

Jamie Gorelick got her 26,000,000 pieces of silver and all Barney Frank got was a young piece of ass.


2 posted on 04/11/2013 11:23:37 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (America 2013 - STUCK ON STUPID)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: whitedog57

Yeah, right.

The folks at Politico are there because they are such masters at math.

/S

Let us all remember what types of folks to into politics...and that those who are even less talented to into political reporting.


3 posted on 04/11/2013 11:29:27 AM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: whitedog57

Jon Prior - Politico’s Chief Economist - NOT!


4 posted on 04/11/2013 11:30:54 AM PDT by illiac (If we don't change directions soon, we'll get where we're going)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: whitedog57

What a bunch of cr4p! Remember Politico is the White House. Both are known LIARS.


5 posted on 04/11/2013 11:37:25 AM PDT by ColdOne (I miss my poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: whitedog57

As a junior senator, hussein was their #2 man in the amount of kickback$. He’s not likely to let that get away now that he’s on the throne.


6 posted on 04/11/2013 12:34:31 PM PDT by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson