Posted on 07/14/2013 1:45:58 AM PDT by elhombrelibre
The outcome from the Zimmerman trial is first obvious. The cops saw there was not enough evidence to arrest Zimmerman. They saw that there could not be a conviction. The race hustler industry needed a new poster boy to blame all of the troubles that their claptrap cannot solve on and decided that Zimmerman's not being charged fit the bill. President Obama claimed vicarious parenthood for the "victim" Trayvon Martin to spark up anger in the black community and to help get out the vote for the feckless leader. Zimmerman is acquitted, but the violent black underclass, those who admire them, and those self-serving leaders who use them will try to kill Zimmerman. Can't Zimmerman sue the New Black Panthers and the so-called Reverends so that he can have enough money to live out his life in peace?
That level of stupid must really burn.
One: Martim most likely committed several robberies in that neighborhood. Two: It was Zimmerman's job to check people, suspicious people, out. Martin was acting suspiciously. Three:Zimmerman didn't "chase" Martin. He was looking around for him and stopped doing that the minute the police said "We don't need you to do that". He said OK and was heading back to his truck when the punk thug jumped him. Four: All Martin had to do was stay home once he got there but he circled back and lay in wait for Zimmerman to prove how tough he was. Five: You are evidently a frickin' idiot, you certainly are stupid and unable to grasp the facts of this case as they actually happened.
this is how you fight the fight...and evidently he’s also suing NBC....good for him...
fl taxpayers need to make stand your ground EVEN STRONGER to never again have a bondi,corey,rao,bernie,dollman,or msm fiasco.
And what about suing the NAACP for slander and defamation of character?
And what about suing the NAACP for slander and defamation of character?
There is NO evidence Zimmerman got out of his truck and CHASED Martin. In fact Zimmerman was going back to his truck when he was ambushed by Martin. Also Martin didn’t live there and was up to no good since he was in the neighborhood that wasn’t even where he was staying. Why was he there?
One: says who?
Two: No, quite the opposite. As the police rep testified, Zimmerman was specifically told, when the neighborhood watch was set up, that following ‘suspicious’ people is the job of law enforcement, and not his. He failed to follow these simple instructions.
Three: Before he gave up following him, he was following him. This is not a substantive distinction. He stalked a stranger.
Four: All Zimmerman had to do was stay in his truck, like he was instructed to when he signed up for the neighborhood watch. Again, he failed.
Five: Useless whining, ignored.
There are reasons to detest lawyers but the real shame is that there are so many lawyers to detest. We have far too many laws, henceforth far too many lawyers are required. We need to throw out the whole mess and have some new laws written by people who ARE NOT LAWYERS.
He was on a direct route from the 7-11 to the house where he was staying. I don’t know where you got the impression otherwise.
Wow, you got the liberal taking points down to a tee.
Sure you’re on the right site?
Du is where you can follow the narrative instead of the facts......your tag line is a give away too.
No George Zimmerman with gun or people like him here.
http://www.wistv.com/Global/story.asp?S=14965429
re: “....on a direct route ...”
Wonder where he was during the four minutes that no one knew where he was, the four minutes that the Defense showed was missing during the Trial....probably going back for more skittles.
Be gone “Lord of the Flies”.
I believe youa are mistaken, Elmer Thomas Williams presents his views on you tube as “E.T. Williams, the doctor of common sense”. Williams does not smoke a cigar, the video of the cigar smoker is of “5723 Michael”. I am more impressed with Williams than with Michael.
“If George Zimmerman had not been born, Travon Marin would still be alive today looking like 0bama’s son if he had one.”
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
I understand your rhetorical point but that sentence is also a fine example of an unwarranted conclusion. The reason I mention it is that the left is famous for unwarranted conclusions. No one can know whether Trayvon Martin would be alive or dead today if George Zimmerman had not been born, we can only be certain that he would not have been shot by George Zimmerman, at least not the George Zimmerman in question. It is similiar to saying that someone who died in battle would be alive today if the soldier who killed him had not been born, in reality he might have been killed one second later by a different bullet from a different shooter.
Some of them probably think Peru is a city in the “country” of Africa.
Well, if you think you’re beat, you can always just give up. No sense in staying in the struggle if it’s going to be difficult and challenging, eh?
Great quote from a real race profiteer. Jesse set the path for success for Obama. But Obama never had an illegitimate child nor a single African American parent.
Where was Martin's warning label?
Should there be a recall notice for his brother?
NBC should be the first one sued, I believe their editing of Zimmerman’s call to police is what started this whole race thing about this case.
Profoundly ignorant.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.