[massmike]

Full title:

MSNBC Host Joy Reid, Who Makes Everything About Race, Asks Guests: Why Do Conservatives Want To Make Chris Lane Shooting “Racial?”…

[cripplecreek]

Why did liberals choose to make the Trayvon Martin shooting racial?

[Servant of the Cross]

Conservatives: Why Does MSNBC Host Joy ReidWant To Make Trayvon Martin Shooting “Racial?”…

[cotton1706]

White guy murdered by some bored black guys. Yeah, I guess that’s not racial.

But a hispanic guy (we’ll call him a white hispanic) kills a black guy who’s pounding his head on the pavement, and that’s racial.

[gov_bean_ counter]

Oh yeah. If not for guns there would be no gang violence. They'd just meet in their tree house or go play marbles.

Amazing.

[Noumenon]

Disgusting. They won’t stop until they get their race war.

[pieceofthepuzzle]

“MSNBC Host Joy Reid, Who Makes Everything About Race, Asks Guests: Why Do Conservatives Want To Make Chris Lane Shooting “Racial?”… “

You just can’t make it up. You really can’t. They have absolutely no shame, and won’t waiver from their self-evident hypocrisy no matter what. All you can do is point out, loudly, how hypocritical they are, and hope someone listens.

[PapaBear3625]

Thought experiment for Joy Reid: if three white guys declared they were bored and randomly shot some black guy, would Joy accept it was non-racial, just on their say-so?

[Little Ray]

When a “white” shoots a black thug, it is about race.
When a black thug shoots a white, it is about guns.
Beginning to see a pattern, anyone?

[Caliban]

The tv host should address the beating death of Shorty by two flashlight wielding blacks....

[Las Vegas Ron]

Classic projection.

Accuse them of what you do.

[Colonel_Flagg]

Oh, I don’t know, Joy. Ask George Zimmerman, if you can find him.

[Paine in the Neck]

WE didn't make it racial. The SHOOTERS made it racial.

[kenavi]

"But can we get away from the fact that the common denominator are young people with access to guns?”

Elder Delbert Belton should have been so "lucky".

[driftless2]

You can’t make this stuff up. Liberals seize every opportunity from politics to how you bake cookies to claim racism. Then when conservatives point out an obvious case of racist-inspired violence, the left adopts a straight face and claims not to understand. The unbelievable hypocrisy of the left has reached galactic proportions.

[2ndDivisionVet]

"It’s access to guns."

All three of Christopher Lane's alleged assailants were minors, so it was already illegal for them to have access to guns, genius! Criminals don't follow the rules, Joy.

[Uncle Miltie]

TRAYVON

0BAMA POISONED RACE RELATIONS FOR A GENERATION.

EVERYTHING IS RACIAL NOW.

[alloysteel]

Why do conservatives want to make Chris Lane shooting "racial"?

Because if anything at all is "racial", this was certainly motivated by just boiling, visceral HATRED, with the fact the victim was Caucasian being the determining factor for selection.

The perps did not, could not, have any prior connection with the victim. To them, it was like shooting out a window pane in a vacant house, a target, an avatar on a game board. If they had chosen a person of the same racial characteristics as themselves, it would not be "racial" at all, just a coldly calculated murder.

The perps made the shooting "racial", not the people reporting on the situation in its entirety.

[ForAmerica]

Why Do Conservatives Want To Make Chris Lane Shooting Racial?

Because was a racially motivated shooting!

[Uncle Miltie]

"But can we get away from the fact that the common denominator are young BLACK people with access to guns?”

There. Fixed it.

[deport]

But can we get away from the fact that the common denominator are young
people with access to guns?”

************

Now the next question should be ‘how many of these guns were purchased legally by
the shooter’? If not a legal purchase by the shooter then how did the shooter come
into possession of the gun?

One stat I’d like to see is how many of these guns were stolen or legally owned
by the shooter.