Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Breaking: Bureau of Land Management Won’t Enforce Court Order Against Bundy Cows
PJ Tatler / The Associated Press ^ | April 12, 2014 | Rick Moran

Posted on 04/13/2014 2:31:16 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

The Bureau of Land Management announced that it would not enforce a court order to round up cows owned by Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy, effectively ending the siege at the southern Nevada ranch.

Associated Press:

“Based on information about conditions on the ground, and in consultation with law enforcement, we have made a decision to conclude the cattle gather because of our serious concern about the safety of employees and members of the public,” BLM Director Neil Kornze said.

“We ask that all parties in the area remain peaceful and law-abiding as the Bureau of Land Management and National Park Service work to end the operation in an orderly manner,” he said....

(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: blm; bundy; bundyranch; harryreid; nevada
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-148 next last
To: dfwgator

You mean those guys who try to give technical help when you call your TV provider?


101 posted on 04/13/2014 4:25:58 PM PDT by 353FMG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: crz

Considering the amount of internet traffic watching this story I would not be surprised. Many, many Americans are watching closer than ever before the criminals running the District of Criminals plus the State subsidiaries.


102 posted on 04/13/2014 4:26:11 PM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: unixfox

The people who ordered them are the ones who need to be strung up.


103 posted on 04/13/2014 4:26:20 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Haven't you lost enough freedoms? Support an end to the WOD now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

I have read and it appears the court has done a rare thing in bypassing the Marshall’s service in this order. Me wonders if they will be brought off the bench for the next go around.


104 posted on 04/13/2014 4:29:00 PM PDT by DeWalt (Times are more like they used to be than they are today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Amendment10
State Land/Fed Land.

Well it is Public Land. At the moment, the legal system deems it to be Federal Land.

As we know, The Law now is quite fluid. Much of The Law now comes from the mouth of Bammy and from the mouth of H0lder.

Why shouldn't The Law also come from the mouth of Cliven Bundy?

105 posted on 04/13/2014 4:29:17 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
The people who ordered them are the ones who need to be strung up.

We save them for the vultures.

106 posted on 04/13/2014 4:30:38 PM PDT by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal the 16th Amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Red_Devil 232
I got a feeling that Obama got a daja vu moment. Last time he felt threatened like that was when the tea party marched on DC.

When I saw Marine One flying over us, I knew that moment that he had marked us for him enemy.

Have a care you folks in the west, that he doesn't do to you what he tried to so to us (ie IRS)

107 posted on 04/13/2014 4:30:39 PM PDT by mware
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DeWalt

The order is permissive not mandatory.


108 posted on 04/13/2014 4:31:17 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

It still gives authority. Wonder why though.


109 posted on 04/13/2014 4:33:45 PM PDT by DeWalt (Times are more like they used to be than they are today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: DeWalt

IANAL.


110 posted on 04/13/2014 4:35:02 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: DeWalt

Interesting it mentions the Sheriff and possible resistance or conflict.


111 posted on 04/13/2014 4:35:52 PM PDT by DeWalt (Times are more like they used to be than they are today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Amendment10

Nevada gave up the land when they became a state

http://www.c-span.org/video/?314028-1/federal-land-rights-nevada


112 posted on 04/13/2014 4:36:46 PM PDT by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: jsanders2001

The US govt is going to push this Agenda 21 on us until its root hog or die. They will not allow us to retreat.


113 posted on 04/13/2014 4:38:25 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2; All
At the moment, the legal system deems it to be Federal Land.

Thank you.

But regardless what the courts say, do you know if the feds acquired the land via constitutional process with just compensation, or did the feds acquire it bureaucratically outside the framework of the Constitution?

114 posted on 04/13/2014 4:38:27 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Amendment10
Next, if the feds do own the land in which case Hanity is wrong, then did they acquire it by proper compensation according to either the Constitution's Clause 17 of Section 8 of Article I, or the eminent domain clause of the 5th Amendment?
Acquired in the Treaty of Guadeloupe Hidalgo in 1848, known as the Mexican Cession, approve and verified by the US Senate of the day. Same type of acquisition as the Louisiana Purchase, the Gadsen Purchase, Treaty of Paris, etc.
What constitutional clause am I overlooking that gives any federal agency the right to tell people what to do concerning land that the feds do not own?
Well, the Feds are considered to be the clear owners of that land. In this case, it is specifically governed under the Taylor Grazing Act of 1934 and the Public Rangelands Improvement Act of 1978. Those two Acts are considered by the courts to have constitutional justification under the following: “The congress shall have power to dispose of and make all needful rules and regulations respecting the territory or other property belonging to the United States.” Property Clause, U.S. Constitution, Art. IV, § 3, cl. 2.

If you want to know the legal justifications given in Court, this is a good guide.
115 posted on 04/13/2014 4:38:52 PM PDT by GAFreedom (Freedom rings in GA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

So, Obastard and Holder’s selective enforcement policy is shot through the entire administration. Good to know the lawlessness is universal.


116 posted on 04/13/2014 4:38:55 PM PDT by Cyber Liberty (H.L. Mencken: "The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eagles6

Grrr


117 posted on 04/13/2014 4:42:47 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: EricT.

High Ground = Advantage


118 posted on 04/13/2014 4:43:12 PM PDT by GOYAKLA (Waiting for the Golden Screw to be removed from Obama's navel and his a$$ falls off!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

119 posted on 04/13/2014 4:44:52 PM PDT by Rodamala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

What needs to be done is let this settle naturally, then, take it up again enmass about two to three weeks prior to the next election. Shout it from the tops of the mountains.

The way I see it, the last polls on how well the citizens trust this government-only a few percent, it would be a real dagger in the hearts of the elites.


120 posted on 04/13/2014 4:45:50 PM PDT by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-148 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson